Reframing the Settler: Reconstructing Black, Native, and White Histories in Indian Territory

IF 0.4 3区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI:10.1017/S1537781423000063
Keziah Anderson
{"title":"Reframing the Settler: Reconstructing Black, Native, and White Histories in Indian Territory","authors":"Keziah Anderson","doi":"10.1017/S1537781423000063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indigenous nations and descendants of Black slaves are rarely thought of as “settlers” in United States history. The term more commonly evokes images of the Mayflower or the Euro-American “Boomers” and “Sooners” who expropriated Indigenous lands in the Land Runs of the late 1800s. In I’ve Been Here All the While: Black Freedom on Native Land, historian Alaina E. Roberts boldly reframes traditional definitions of settler colonialism beyond the mere occupation of land through force by emphasizing a broader “transformation in thinking about and rhetorical justification of what itmeant to reside in a place formerly occupied by someone else” (2). Rather than confining settler colonial processes to dominant Euro-American groups, Roberts explores how subjugated people also “served the goals of spatial occupation and white supremacy,” or the “dual nature of settler colonialism,” by claiming land, rewriting history, and pursuing federal intervention to reinforce their land rights (2). Focusing on the post-Removal lands of the Five Tribes (the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Muscogee Creek, and Seminole Nations), Roberts forcefully asserts that the Native peoples coercively removed to Indian Territory, the formerly enslaved Black people forced across the Trail of Tears with them (whom Roberts terms “Indian freedpeople”), and Black American migrants to Indian Territory all practiced settler colonialism prior to Euro-American political dominance in the region. In a second central argument, Roberts expands the timeline of Reconstruction to 1907 (thirty years after the traditional end date of 1877), offering a critical historiographical intervention that marks the moment when Indian freedpeople received their Dawes land allotments and Oklahoma became a state. Roberts’s innovative study draws from her unique stakes and knowledge as a descendant of the Indigenous, Afro-Native, Black, and white Americans she investigates. Throughout the book, Roberts kneads in family histories of her ancestors and embraces her perspective as their descendant “to see how their freedoms and opportunities were begotten by impeding the freedoms and opportunities of others” (11).","PeriodicalId":43534,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537781423000063","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Indigenous nations and descendants of Black slaves are rarely thought of as “settlers” in United States history. The term more commonly evokes images of the Mayflower or the Euro-American “Boomers” and “Sooners” who expropriated Indigenous lands in the Land Runs of the late 1800s. In I’ve Been Here All the While: Black Freedom on Native Land, historian Alaina E. Roberts boldly reframes traditional definitions of settler colonialism beyond the mere occupation of land through force by emphasizing a broader “transformation in thinking about and rhetorical justification of what itmeant to reside in a place formerly occupied by someone else” (2). Rather than confining settler colonial processes to dominant Euro-American groups, Roberts explores how subjugated people also “served the goals of spatial occupation and white supremacy,” or the “dual nature of settler colonialism,” by claiming land, rewriting history, and pursuing federal intervention to reinforce their land rights (2). Focusing on the post-Removal lands of the Five Tribes (the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Muscogee Creek, and Seminole Nations), Roberts forcefully asserts that the Native peoples coercively removed to Indian Territory, the formerly enslaved Black people forced across the Trail of Tears with them (whom Roberts terms “Indian freedpeople”), and Black American migrants to Indian Territory all practiced settler colonialism prior to Euro-American political dominance in the region. In a second central argument, Roberts expands the timeline of Reconstruction to 1907 (thirty years after the traditional end date of 1877), offering a critical historiographical intervention that marks the moment when Indian freedpeople received their Dawes land allotments and Oklahoma became a state. Roberts’s innovative study draws from her unique stakes and knowledge as a descendant of the Indigenous, Afro-Native, Black, and white Americans she investigates. Throughout the book, Roberts kneads in family histories of her ancestors and embraces her perspective as their descendant “to see how their freedoms and opportunities were begotten by impeding the freedoms and opportunities of others” (11).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重塑定居者:重建印度领土上的黑人、原住民和白人历史
在美国历史上,土著民族和黑奴后裔很少被认为是“定居者”。这个词更常见的是让人联想到五月花或欧美“婴儿潮一代”和“宋人”的形象,他们在19世纪末的土地争夺中征用了土著土地。在《我一直在这里:原住民土地上的黑人自由》一书中,历史学家阿兰娜·E·罗伯茨大胆地重新定义了定居者殖民主义的传统定义,超越了仅仅通过武力占领土地的定义,强调了更广泛的“对居住在以前被他人占领的地方意味着什么的思考和修辞上的正当性的转变”(2)。罗伯茨没有将定居者的殖民过程局限于占主导地位的欧美群体,而是探讨了被征服的人如何通过索取土地、改写历史和寻求联邦干预来加强他们的土地权利,“为空间占领和白人至上的目标服务”,或“定居者殖民主义的双重性质”(2)。围绕五个部落(切罗基人、奇卡索人、乔克托人、马斯科吉溪人和塞米诺尔人)搬迁后的土地,罗伯茨有力地断言,原住民被强迫迁移到印度领土,以前被奴役的黑人被迫与他们一起穿过眼泪之路(罗伯茨称之为“印度自由人”),在欧美在该地区占据政治主导地位之前,移民到印度领土的美国黑人都实行了定居者殖民主义。在第二个核心论点中,罗伯茨将重建的时间线扩展到1907年(比传统的1877年结束日期晚了30年),提供了一个关键的历史干预,标志着印度自由人民获得了他们的道斯土地分配,俄克拉荷马州成为一个州。罗伯茨的创新研究借鉴了她作为土著、非裔、黑人和白人美国人后裔的独特利害关系和知识。在整本书中,罗伯茨揉捏了她的祖先的家族历史,并接受了她作为他们后代的观点,“看看他们的自由和机会是如何通过阻碍他人的自由和机遇而产生的”(11)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊最新文献
Employers and the Battle for the Closed Shop International Arbitration and the Roots of Women’s Foreign Policy Activism Reframing the Settler: Reconstructing Black, Native, and White Histories in Indian Territory JGA volume 22 issue 3 Cover and Back matter A Delayed Revenge: “Yellow Journalism” and the Long Quest for Cuba, 1851–1898
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1