Combat-Related Invasive Fungal Wound Infections.

Ret Carlos J Rodriguez, A. Ganesan, Faraz Shaikh, M. L. Carson, William P. Bradley, T. Warkentien, D. Tribble
{"title":"Combat-Related Invasive Fungal Wound Infections.","authors":"Ret Carlos J Rodriguez, A. Ganesan, Faraz Shaikh, M. L. Carson, William P. Bradley, T. Warkentien, D. Tribble","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usab074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nDuring Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan, an outbreak of combat-related invasive fungal wound infections (IFIs) emerged among casualties with dismounted blast trauma and became a priority issue for the Military Health System.\n\n\nMETHODS\nIn 2011, the Trauma Infectious Disease Outcomes Study (TIDOS) team led the Department of Defense IFI outbreak investigation to describe characteristics of IFIs among combat casualties and provide recommendations related to management of the disease. To support the outbreak investigation, existing IFI definitions and classifications utilized for immunocompromised patients were modified for use in epidemiologic research in a trauma population. Following the conclusion of the outbreak investigation, multiple retrospective analyses using a population of 77 IFI patients (injured during June 2009 to August 2011) were conducted to evaluate IFI epidemiology, wound microbiology, and diagnostics to support refinement of Joint Trauma System (JTS) clinical practice guidelines. Following cessation of combat operations in Afghanistan, the TIDOS database was comprehensively reviewed to identify patients with laboratory evidence of a fungal infection and refine the IFI classification scheme to incorporate timing of laboratory fungal evidence and include categories that denote a high or low level of suspicion for IFI. The refined IFI classification scheme was utilized in a large-scale epidemiologic assessment of casualties injured over a 5.5-year period.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAmong 720 combat casualties admitted to participating hospitals (2009-2014) who had histopathology and/or wound cultures collected, 94 (13%) met criteria for an IFI and 61 (8%) were classified as high suspicion of IFI. Risk factors for development of combat-related IFIs include sustaining a dismounted blast injury, experiencing a traumatic transfemoral amputation, and requiring resuscitation with large-volume (>20 units) blood transfusions. Moreover, TIDOS analyses demonstrated the adverse impact of IFIs on wound healing, particularly with order Mucorales. A polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assay to identify filamentous fungi and support earlier IFI diagnosis was also assessed using archived formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens. Although the PCR-based assay had high specificity (99%), there was low sensitivity (63%); however, sensitivity improved to 83% in tissues collected from sites with angioinvasion. Data obtained from the initial IFI outbreak investigation (37 IFI patients) and subsequent TIDOS analyses (77 IFI patients) supported development and refinement of a JTS clinical practice guideline for the management of IFIs in war wounds. Furthermore, a local clinical practice guideline to screen for early tissue-based evidence of IFIs among blast casualties at the Landstuhl Regional Medical Center was critically evaluated through a TIDOS investigation, providing additional clinical practice support. Through a collaboration with the Uniformed Services University Surgical Critical Care Initiative, findings from TIDOS analyses were used to support development of a clinical decision support tool to facilitate early risk stratification.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nCombat-related IFIs are a highly morbid complication following severe blast trauma and remain a threat for future modern warfare. Our findings have supported JTS clinical recommendations, refined IFI classification, and confirmed the utility of PCR-based assays as a complement to histopathology and/or culture to promote early diagnosis. Analyses underway or planned will add to the knowledge base of IFI epidemiology, diagnostics, prevention, and management.","PeriodicalId":86137,"journal":{"name":"Military surgeon","volume":"187 Supplement_2 1","pages":"34-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usab074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

INTRODUCTION During Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan, an outbreak of combat-related invasive fungal wound infections (IFIs) emerged among casualties with dismounted blast trauma and became a priority issue for the Military Health System. METHODS In 2011, the Trauma Infectious Disease Outcomes Study (TIDOS) team led the Department of Defense IFI outbreak investigation to describe characteristics of IFIs among combat casualties and provide recommendations related to management of the disease. To support the outbreak investigation, existing IFI definitions and classifications utilized for immunocompromised patients were modified for use in epidemiologic research in a trauma population. Following the conclusion of the outbreak investigation, multiple retrospective analyses using a population of 77 IFI patients (injured during June 2009 to August 2011) were conducted to evaluate IFI epidemiology, wound microbiology, and diagnostics to support refinement of Joint Trauma System (JTS) clinical practice guidelines. Following cessation of combat operations in Afghanistan, the TIDOS database was comprehensively reviewed to identify patients with laboratory evidence of a fungal infection and refine the IFI classification scheme to incorporate timing of laboratory fungal evidence and include categories that denote a high or low level of suspicion for IFI. The refined IFI classification scheme was utilized in a large-scale epidemiologic assessment of casualties injured over a 5.5-year period. RESULTS Among 720 combat casualties admitted to participating hospitals (2009-2014) who had histopathology and/or wound cultures collected, 94 (13%) met criteria for an IFI and 61 (8%) were classified as high suspicion of IFI. Risk factors for development of combat-related IFIs include sustaining a dismounted blast injury, experiencing a traumatic transfemoral amputation, and requiring resuscitation with large-volume (>20 units) blood transfusions. Moreover, TIDOS analyses demonstrated the adverse impact of IFIs on wound healing, particularly with order Mucorales. A polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assay to identify filamentous fungi and support earlier IFI diagnosis was also assessed using archived formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens. Although the PCR-based assay had high specificity (99%), there was low sensitivity (63%); however, sensitivity improved to 83% in tissues collected from sites with angioinvasion. Data obtained from the initial IFI outbreak investigation (37 IFI patients) and subsequent TIDOS analyses (77 IFI patients) supported development and refinement of a JTS clinical practice guideline for the management of IFIs in war wounds. Furthermore, a local clinical practice guideline to screen for early tissue-based evidence of IFIs among blast casualties at the Landstuhl Regional Medical Center was critically evaluated through a TIDOS investigation, providing additional clinical practice support. Through a collaboration with the Uniformed Services University Surgical Critical Care Initiative, findings from TIDOS analyses were used to support development of a clinical decision support tool to facilitate early risk stratification. CONCLUSIONS Combat-related IFIs are a highly morbid complication following severe blast trauma and remain a threat for future modern warfare. Our findings have supported JTS clinical recommendations, refined IFI classification, and confirmed the utility of PCR-based assays as a complement to histopathology and/or culture to promote early diagnosis. Analyses underway or planned will add to the knowledge base of IFI epidemiology, diagnostics, prevention, and management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
战斗相关的侵袭性真菌伤口感染。
在阿富汗持久自由行动期间,战斗相关的侵袭性真菌伤口感染(IFIs)在下车的爆炸创伤伤员中爆发,成为军队卫生系统的优先问题。方法2011年,创伤传染病结局研究(TIDOS)小组领导了国防部IFI爆发调查,以描述战斗伤亡中IFI的特征,并提供与疾病管理相关的建议。为了支持疫情调查,修改了用于免疫功能低下患者的现有IFI定义和分类,以便用于创伤人群的流行病学研究。在疫情调查结束后,对77名IFI患者(2009年6月至2011年8月期间受伤)进行了多次回顾性分析,以评估IFI流行病学、伤口微生物学和诊断,以支持改进关节创伤系统(JTS)临床实践指南。在阿富汗战斗行动结束后,对TIDOS数据库进行了全面审查,以确定具有真菌感染实验室证据的患者,并完善IFI分类方案,以纳入实验室真菌证据的时间,并包括表明IFI高或低怀疑程度的类别。精细化的IFI分类方案被用于5.5年期间伤亡的大规模流行病学评估。结果在2009-2014年参与医院接收的720名战斗伤病员中,收集了组织病理学和/或伤口培养物,94名(13%)符合IFI标准,61名(8%)被归类为高度怀疑IFI。发生与战斗有关的ifi的危险因素包括:遭受下车的爆炸伤害、经历外伤性经股截肢,以及需要大容量(100 - 20单位)输血进行复苏。此外,TIDOS分析显示ifi对伤口愈合的不利影响,特别是对毛霉菌。利用存档的福尔马林固定石蜡包埋组织标本,对基于聚合酶链反应(PCR)的鉴定丝状真菌和支持早期IFI诊断的方法进行了评估。尽管基于pcr的检测具有高特异性(99%),但灵敏度较低(63%);然而,在血管浸润部位收集的组织中,敏感性提高到83%。从最初的IFI暴发调查(37例IFI患者)和随后的TIDOS分析(77例IFI患者)中获得的数据支持了JTS关于战争创伤IFI管理的临床实践指南的制定和完善。此外,通过一项TIDOS调查,对Landstuhl地区医疗中心在爆炸伤员中筛查ifi早期组织证据的当地临床实践指南进行了严格评估,提供了额外的临床实践支持。通过与统一服务大学外科重症监护倡议的合作,TIDOS分析的结果被用于支持临床决策支持工具的开发,以促进早期风险分层。结论与战斗相关的ifi是严重爆炸创伤后的一种高发病率并发症,仍然是未来现代战争的威胁。我们的研究结果支持了JTS的临床建议,完善了IFI分类,并证实了基于pcr的检测方法作为组织病理学和/或培养的补充,可以促进早期诊断。正在进行或计划进行的分析将增加国际金融机构流行病学、诊断、预防和管理的知识库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Race Differences in Veteran's Affairs Emergency Department Utilization. Diagnostic Accuracy of the Boston Assessment of Traumatic Brain Injury-Lifetime Clinical Interview Compared to Department of Defense Medical Records. Symptoms and Central Sensory Integration in People With Chronic mTBI: Clinical Implications. Correlates of Dietary Behaviors Among Young Emirati Males Completing Compulsory Military Service. Physiological Demands and Characteristics of Movement During Simulated Combat.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1