Physiological Demands and Characteristics of Movement During Simulated Combat.

Jonas Larsson, M Charlotte Olsson, Ann Bremander, Magnus Dencker
{"title":"Physiological Demands and Characteristics of Movement During Simulated Combat.","authors":"Jonas Larsson, M Charlotte Olsson, Ann Bremander, Magnus Dencker","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usac163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Military tasks place considerable physiological demands on the soldier. It is therefore important to know the energy expenditure of soldiers while solving tasks in different environments. The purpose of this study was to describe the cardiorespiratory demands of certain movements and activities on ground combat soldiers during military field operations using body sensors and simulated combat.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Movement characteristics and cardiorespiratory responses were assessed in 42 soldiers (three women) in the Swedish Army. The different posts assessed were commander, combat engineer, driver, and gunner. The military field exercises examined were urban operations and retrograde operations in rough terrain. Measurements included (1) body mass, (2) heart rate (HR) including maximal (HRmax), (3) velocity, (4) accelerations/decelerations, and (5) distance moved. Maximal aerobic capacity (V̇O2peak, mL·kg-1·min-1) was tested in a laboratory setting when wearing combat gear and body armor.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a weak positive correlation (r = 0.41 and 0.28, both P < .05) between VO2peak and percentage of time over 40% and 50% of maximal aerobic capacity during simulated combat. No differences were found for the different posts in time spent over 40% or 50% of maximal aerobic capacity and 76% of their HRmax (P > .05). Wearing combat gear and additional load while solving tasks resulted in mean HR varying between 98 and 111 beats·min-1, corresponding with 50-57% of the soldiers HRmax. Studying all exercises, mean HR was 105 ± 11 beats min-1, 54 ± 5% of HRmax corresponding to light work intensity. Soldiers performed between 2.8 and 4.9 accelerations/min in the different exercises. A significant correlation between V̇O2peak (mL kg-1 min-1) and acceleration and m/min were found, implying that soldiers with good aerobic capacity were able to cope better with tasks requiring quick movements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conducting military operations in urban terrain and retrograde operations in rough terrain strains ground combat soldiers' cardiorespiratory system, with work intensities close to 40% of maximal aerobic capacity in 15-33% of mission time. Tasks with external load carriage include change of direction, accelerations, bounds, and jumping over obstacles, and physical fitness tests should replicate this. Findings in this study also add objective data to the physiological demands of work performed by combat soldiers while conducting urban operations and retrograde operations in rough terrain. These findings could be used to develop a model for classifying work demands for ground combat forces.</p>","PeriodicalId":86137,"journal":{"name":"Military surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"3496-3505"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629984/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usac163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Military tasks place considerable physiological demands on the soldier. It is therefore important to know the energy expenditure of soldiers while solving tasks in different environments. The purpose of this study was to describe the cardiorespiratory demands of certain movements and activities on ground combat soldiers during military field operations using body sensors and simulated combat.

Materials and methods: Movement characteristics and cardiorespiratory responses were assessed in 42 soldiers (three women) in the Swedish Army. The different posts assessed were commander, combat engineer, driver, and gunner. The military field exercises examined were urban operations and retrograde operations in rough terrain. Measurements included (1) body mass, (2) heart rate (HR) including maximal (HRmax), (3) velocity, (4) accelerations/decelerations, and (5) distance moved. Maximal aerobic capacity (V̇O2peak, mL·kg-1·min-1) was tested in a laboratory setting when wearing combat gear and body armor.

Results: There was a weak positive correlation (r = 0.41 and 0.28, both P < .05) between VO2peak and percentage of time over 40% and 50% of maximal aerobic capacity during simulated combat. No differences were found for the different posts in time spent over 40% or 50% of maximal aerobic capacity and 76% of their HRmax (P > .05). Wearing combat gear and additional load while solving tasks resulted in mean HR varying between 98 and 111 beats·min-1, corresponding with 50-57% of the soldiers HRmax. Studying all exercises, mean HR was 105 ± 11 beats min-1, 54 ± 5% of HRmax corresponding to light work intensity. Soldiers performed between 2.8 and 4.9 accelerations/min in the different exercises. A significant correlation between V̇O2peak (mL kg-1 min-1) and acceleration and m/min were found, implying that soldiers with good aerobic capacity were able to cope better with tasks requiring quick movements.

Conclusion: Conducting military operations in urban terrain and retrograde operations in rough terrain strains ground combat soldiers' cardiorespiratory system, with work intensities close to 40% of maximal aerobic capacity in 15-33% of mission time. Tasks with external load carriage include change of direction, accelerations, bounds, and jumping over obstacles, and physical fitness tests should replicate this. Findings in this study also add objective data to the physiological demands of work performed by combat soldiers while conducting urban operations and retrograde operations in rough terrain. These findings could be used to develop a model for classifying work demands for ground combat forces.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模拟作战中的生理需求和运动特点。
引言军事任务对士兵提出了相当高的生理要求。因此,了解士兵在不同环境中解决任务时的能量消耗是很重要的。本研究的目的是使用身体传感器和模拟战斗来描述地面作战士兵在军事野战中某些动作和活动的心肺需求。材料和方法对瑞典军队42名士兵(3名女性)的运动特征和心肺反应进行了评估。评估的不同职位包括指挥官、作战工程师、驾驶员和炮手。考察的军事实地演习是城市作战和在崎岖地形上的逆行作战。测量包括(1)体重,(2)心率(HR),包括最大心率(HRmax),(3)速度,(4)加速/减速,以及(5)移动距离。在实验室环境中测试了穿着战斗装备和防弹衣时的最大有氧能力(V̇O2peak,mL·kg-1·min-1)。结果两者呈弱正相关(r = 0.41和0.28,均为P  .05)。在解决任务时穿戴作战装备和额外负荷导致平均HR在98到111拍·min-1之间变化,对应于50-57%的士兵HRmax。研究所有练习,平均HR为105 ± 11次心跳min-1,54 ± 对应于光工作强度的HRmax的5%。在不同的演习中,士兵们的加速度在2.8到4.9之间/分钟。V̇O2峰值(mL kg-1 min-1)与加速度和m/min之间存在显著相关性,这意味着具有良好有氧能力的士兵能够更好地应对需要快速运动的任务。结论在城市地形下进行军事行动和在崎岖地形下进行逆行行动会使地面作战士兵的心肺系统紧张,在15-33%的任务时间内,工作强度接近最大有氧能力的40%。外部承载的任务包括改变方向、加速度、边界和跳过障碍物,体能测试应该重复这一点。这项研究的发现还为作战士兵在崎岖地形中进行城市作战和逆行作战时所需的生理需求增加了客观数据。这些发现可用于开发地面作战部队工作需求分类模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Race Differences in Veteran's Affairs Emergency Department Utilization. Diagnostic Accuracy of the Boston Assessment of Traumatic Brain Injury-Lifetime Clinical Interview Compared to Department of Defense Medical Records. Symptoms and Central Sensory Integration in People With Chronic mTBI: Clinical Implications. Correlates of Dietary Behaviors Among Young Emirati Males Completing Compulsory Military Service. Physiological Demands and Characteristics of Movement During Simulated Combat.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1