All Songs Considered: The Persuasive Listening of Music Podcasts

IF 0.5 2区 艺术学 0 MUSIC Twentieth-Century Music Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1017/S1478572222000275
Byrd Mcdaniel
{"title":"All Songs Considered: The Persuasive Listening of Music Podcasts","authors":"Byrd Mcdaniel","doi":"10.1017/S1478572222000275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Music podcasts have proliferated as public discourse about popular music. A significant part of the expanding podcast industry, music podcasts include titles such as All Songs Considered, Switched on Pop, Song Exploder, Sound Opinions, New York Times Popcast, and Lost Notes. These podcasts often feature a combination of conversation and musical selections, which highlight aspects of the music for podcast listeners. In this article, I argue that we should think of music podcasts as persuasive demonstrations of music consumption. Music podcasts present music as a subject for discussion and also implicitly model listening techniques, convincing podcast listeners to adopt specific approaches to music recordings. I explore three podcasts: All Songs Considered, Switched on Pop, and Disability Visibility. I examine how these podcasts present music as their subject, while advancing particular theories of listening that can serve or subvert privileged modes of music reception.","PeriodicalId":43259,"journal":{"name":"Twentieth-Century Music","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Twentieth-Century Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478572222000275","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Music podcasts have proliferated as public discourse about popular music. A significant part of the expanding podcast industry, music podcasts include titles such as All Songs Considered, Switched on Pop, Song Exploder, Sound Opinions, New York Times Popcast, and Lost Notes. These podcasts often feature a combination of conversation and musical selections, which highlight aspects of the music for podcast listeners. In this article, I argue that we should think of music podcasts as persuasive demonstrations of music consumption. Music podcasts present music as a subject for discussion and also implicitly model listening techniques, convincing podcast listeners to adopt specific approaches to music recordings. I explore three podcasts: All Songs Considered, Switched on Pop, and Disability Visibility. I examine how these podcasts present music as their subject, while advancing particular theories of listening that can serve or subvert privileged modes of music reception.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考虑所有歌曲:音乐播客的说服性聆听
音乐播客作为流行音乐的公共话语已经激增。音乐播客是不断扩大的播客行业的重要组成部分,包括《All Songs Considered》、《Switched on Pop》、《Song Exploder》、《Sound Opinions》、《New York Times Popcast》和《Lost Notes》等。这些播客通常结合了对话和音乐选择,为播客听众突出了音乐的各个方面。在这篇文章中,我认为我们应该把音乐播客看作是音乐消费的有说服力的展示。音乐播客将音乐作为一个讨论的主题,同时也隐含地模拟了听力技巧,说服播客听众采用特定的方法来录制音乐。我探索了三个播客:All Songs Considered、switch on Pop和Disability Visibility。我研究了这些播客是如何将音乐作为主题呈现的,同时推进了特定的聆听理论,这些理论可以服务于或颠覆音乐接受的特权模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Solitary Listening, Copyright, and Reification during the Interwar Years: A Discourse Theoretic Approach Neoliberal Reason, Contemporary Music, and Proximal Critique The Panama Songs: Colonial Structures in US Popular Music between 1900 and 1920 The British (and International?) Music Society: Australian Identity and Musical Internationalism in Interwar Sydney ‘Chile – Ballad of the Cameraman’: New Song and ‘Revolutionary’ South America in Wolf Biermann's Anthems of East German Critical Solidarity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1