Traffic conflict prediction using connected vehicle data

IF 12.5 1区 工程技术 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Analytic Methods in Accident Research Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.amar.2023.100275
Zubayer Islam, Mohamed Abdel-Aty
{"title":"Traffic conflict prediction using connected vehicle data","authors":"Zubayer Islam,&nbsp;Mohamed Abdel-Aty","doi":"10.1016/j.amar.2023.100275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Transportation safety studies have been mostly focused on using crash data that are rare events. Alternatively, conflict estimation can be used to assess safety. This has been proven as a proactive design methodology that does not rely on crashes and requires shorter observation. Traditionally, the safety studies involving both these reactive and proactive methods were based on aggregated data that does not take individual vehicle dynamics into consideration. This paper addresses this research gap by proposing a novel real-time conflict prediction methodology that uses previous instance trajectory data of individual vehicles to understand whether there can be potential conflict in the near future. A long-short term memory (LSTM) model is developed that can apprehend a conflict situation 9 s in the future. Data from connected vehicles have been used. The proposed model returned a recall of 81% with a false alarm rate of 28%. The predictive model has the potential to be implemented on vehicle dashboards to warn drivers of a conflict. The authors have also used SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanation) to interpret the results from the LSTM model. It was deduced that acceleration above 0.3 m/s</span><sup>2</sup>, deceleration within −1.5 m/s<sup>2</sup> to −0.25 m/s<sup>2</sup>, and speed of more than 40kph were responsible for inducing a conflict.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47520,"journal":{"name":"Analytic Methods in Accident Research","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 100275"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytic Methods in Accident Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213665723000106","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Transportation safety studies have been mostly focused on using crash data that are rare events. Alternatively, conflict estimation can be used to assess safety. This has been proven as a proactive design methodology that does not rely on crashes and requires shorter observation. Traditionally, the safety studies involving both these reactive and proactive methods were based on aggregated data that does not take individual vehicle dynamics into consideration. This paper addresses this research gap by proposing a novel real-time conflict prediction methodology that uses previous instance trajectory data of individual vehicles to understand whether there can be potential conflict in the near future. A long-short term memory (LSTM) model is developed that can apprehend a conflict situation 9 s in the future. Data from connected vehicles have been used. The proposed model returned a recall of 81% with a false alarm rate of 28%. The predictive model has the potential to be implemented on vehicle dashboards to warn drivers of a conflict. The authors have also used SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanation) to interpret the results from the LSTM model. It was deduced that acceleration above 0.3 m/s2, deceleration within −1.5 m/s2 to −0.25 m/s2, and speed of more than 40kph were responsible for inducing a conflict.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于互联车辆数据的交通冲突预测
交通安全研究主要集中在使用罕见事件的碰撞数据上。另外,冲突估计可以用来评估安全性。这已经被证明是一种主动的设计方法,不依赖于崩溃,需要更短的观察时间。传统上,涉及这些被动和主动方法的安全性研究都是基于汇总数据,而没有考虑到单个车辆的动态。本文通过提出一种新的实时冲突预测方法来解决这一研究空白,该方法使用单个车辆的先前实例轨迹数据来了解近期是否存在潜在的冲突。建立了一个长短期记忆(LSTM)模型,该模型可以理解未来的冲突情况 s。已经使用了联网车辆的数据。该模型的召回率为81%,误报率为28%。该预测模型有可能在汽车仪表板上实现,以警告司机发生冲突。作者还使用SHapley加性解释(SHapley Additive exPlanation)来解释LSTM模型的结果。结果表明,加速度大于0.3 m/s2,减速小于- 1.5 m/s2 ~ - 0.25 m/s2,车速大于40kph是导致碰撞的主要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.10
自引率
34.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Analytic Methods in Accident Research is a journal that publishes articles related to the development and application of advanced statistical and econometric methods in studying vehicle crashes and other accidents. The journal aims to demonstrate how these innovative approaches can provide new insights into the factors influencing the occurrence and severity of accidents, thereby offering guidance for implementing appropriate preventive measures. While the journal primarily focuses on the analytic approach, it also accepts articles covering various aspects of transportation safety (such as road, pedestrian, air, rail, and water safety), construction safety, and other areas where human behavior, machine failures, or system failures lead to property damage or bodily harm.
期刊最新文献
Determinants influencing alcohol-related two-vehicle crash severity: A multivariate Bayesian hierarchical random parameters correlated outcomes logit model Effects of sample size on pedestrian crash risk estimation from traffic conflicts using extreme value models Editorial Board A cross-comparison of different extreme value modeling techniques for traffic conflict-based crash risk estimation The role of posted speed limit on pedestrian and bicycle injury severities: An investigation into systematic and unobserved heterogeneities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1