Moving Ethnography

IF 1.9 4区 社会学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Science and Technology Studies Pub Date : 2021-06-16 DOI:10.23987/STS.89782
A. Khandekar, Brandon Costelloe-Kuehn, Lindsay Poirier, A. Morgan, Alison Kenner, Kim Fortun, M. Fortun, The PECE Design Team
{"title":"Moving Ethnography","authors":"A. Khandekar, Brandon Costelloe-Kuehn, Lindsay Poirier, A. Morgan, Alison Kenner, Kim Fortun, M. Fortun, The PECE Design Team","doi":"10.23987/STS.89782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we describe how our work at a particular nexus of STS, ethnography, and critical theory—informed by experimental sensibilities in both the arts and sciences—transformed as we built and learned to use collaborative workflows and supporting digital infrastructure. Responding to the call of this special issue to be “ethnographic about ethnography,” we describe what we have learned about our own methods and collaborative practices through building digital infrastructure to support them. Supporting and accounting for how experimental ethnographic projects move—through different points in a research workflow, with many switchbacks, with project designs constantly changing as the research develops—was a key challenge. Addressing it depended on understanding creative data practices and analytic workflows, redesigning and building technological infrastructure, and constant attention to collaboration ethics. We refer to this as the need for doubletakes on method. We focus on the development of The Asthma Files, a collaborative ethnography project to understand the cultural dimensions of environmental health, and on the Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography, digital infrastructure first built to support The Asthma Files but now available as a community resource for archiving, analyzing, and publishing ethnographic data and writing. A key finding is that different traditions and practices of ethnography require different infrastructures.","PeriodicalId":45119,"journal":{"name":"Science and Technology Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science and Technology Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23987/STS.89782","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this article, we describe how our work at a particular nexus of STS, ethnography, and critical theory—informed by experimental sensibilities in both the arts and sciences—transformed as we built and learned to use collaborative workflows and supporting digital infrastructure. Responding to the call of this special issue to be “ethnographic about ethnography,” we describe what we have learned about our own methods and collaborative practices through building digital infrastructure to support them. Supporting and accounting for how experimental ethnographic projects move—through different points in a research workflow, with many switchbacks, with project designs constantly changing as the research develops—was a key challenge. Addressing it depended on understanding creative data practices and analytic workflows, redesigning and building technological infrastructure, and constant attention to collaboration ethics. We refer to this as the need for doubletakes on method. We focus on the development of The Asthma Files, a collaborative ethnography project to understand the cultural dimensions of environmental health, and on the Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography, digital infrastructure first built to support The Asthma Files but now available as a community resource for archiving, analyzing, and publishing ethnographic data and writing. A key finding is that different traditions and practices of ethnography require different infrastructures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动民族志
在本文中,我们描述了我们在STS、人种学和批判理论的特定联系上的工作——由艺术和科学的实验敏感性提供信息——是如何随着我们建立和学习使用协作工作流程和支持数字基础设施而转变的。为响应本期特刊“关于民族志的民族志”的号召,我们通过建立数字基础设施来支持我们自己的方法和合作实践,描述了我们对它们的了解。支持和说明实验性人种学项目如何在研究工作流程中通过不同的点,有许多转换,项目设计随着研究的发展而不断变化,这是一个关键的挑战。解决这个问题依赖于理解创造性的数据实践和分析工作流程,重新设计和构建技术基础设施,以及对协作伦理的持续关注。我们将此称为对方法的双重要求。我们专注于“哮喘档案”的发展,这是一个合作的民族志项目,旨在了解环境健康的文化维度;在“实验合作民族志平台”上,这个数字基础设施最初是为了支持“哮喘档案”而建立的,但现在可以作为存档、分析和发布民族志数据和写作的社区资源。一个重要的发现是,不同的民族志传统和实践需要不同的基础设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Science and Technology Studies
Science and Technology Studies HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
23
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
Facilitating the Movement of Knowledge in Occupational Health Services Elliott Anthony (2023) Algorithmic Intimacy. The Digital Revolution in Personal Relationships West Darrel M and Allen John R (2020) Turning Point: Policymaking in the Era of Artificial Intelligence “Should We Stay or Should We Go now?” Knox Hannah (2020) Thinking Like a Climate: Governing a City in Times of Environmental Change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1