OPTIMISING STAKEHOLDER COOPERATION IN INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT

Q4 Environmental Science WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment Pub Date : 2022-12-19 DOI:10.2495/sc220101
J. Mutamba
{"title":"OPTIMISING STAKEHOLDER COOPERATION IN INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT","authors":"J. Mutamba","doi":"10.2495/sc220101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Built projects are levers that drive economic growth. Correspondingly, with the economy under pressure, the need for infrastructure investment in South Africa is more apparent now. Provision of infrastructure has been considered the responsibility of government, with projects often financed by the government, from local to national level and constructed by private contractors – an arm’s length relationship. Performance of these projects has been suboptimal. For a long time, the sector has witnessed an increase in the promotion of more cooperation between the public and private sectors in infrastructure development and operation. Public–private partnerships (PPPs) provide alternative ways to involve private sector in more meaningful ways in public infrastructure delivery. PPPs are not only a financing tool in government investment, but an effective project management approach that public and private sectors could employ in developing infrastructure, jointly sharing risks, costs, and resources. However, despite known PPP benefits, there is limited cooperation between the public and the private sector. There remain some reservations with the private sector on how South Africa will fair under the current leadership – leading to the private sector being shy to invest and openly collaborate with government. Partnership arrangements at strategic level are still difficult, failing to instil confidence at a tactical level where projects are controlled. The private sector needs stability in order to feel confident about investing and joining forces with public sector. This paper looks at innovative approaches to improve cooperative partnerships in public infrastructure development.","PeriodicalId":35178,"journal":{"name":"WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/sc220101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Built projects are levers that drive economic growth. Correspondingly, with the economy under pressure, the need for infrastructure investment in South Africa is more apparent now. Provision of infrastructure has been considered the responsibility of government, with projects often financed by the government, from local to national level and constructed by private contractors – an arm’s length relationship. Performance of these projects has been suboptimal. For a long time, the sector has witnessed an increase in the promotion of more cooperation between the public and private sectors in infrastructure development and operation. Public–private partnerships (PPPs) provide alternative ways to involve private sector in more meaningful ways in public infrastructure delivery. PPPs are not only a financing tool in government investment, but an effective project management approach that public and private sectors could employ in developing infrastructure, jointly sharing risks, costs, and resources. However, despite known PPP benefits, there is limited cooperation between the public and the private sector. There remain some reservations with the private sector on how South Africa will fair under the current leadership – leading to the private sector being shy to invest and openly collaborate with government. Partnership arrangements at strategic level are still difficult, failing to instil confidence at a tactical level where projects are controlled. The private sector needs stability in order to feel confident about investing and joining forces with public sector. This paper looks at innovative approaches to improve cooperative partnerships in public infrastructure development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化基础设施发展中的利益相关方合作
建设项目是推动经济增长的杠杆。相应地,在经济面临压力的情况下,南非对基础设施投资的需求现在更加明显。提供基础设施一直被认为是政府的责任,项目通常由政府出资,从地方到国家,由私人承包商承建——一种保持一定距离的关系。这些项目的性能不是最优的。长期以来,公共和私营部门在基础设施开发和运营方面的合作不断增加。公私伙伴关系(ppp)为私营部门以更有意义的方式参与公共基础设施建设提供了另一种途径。公私合作伙伴关系不仅是政府投资的融资工具,而且是公共和私营部门在发展基础设施、共同分担风险、成本和资源时可采用的有效项目管理方法。然而,尽管公私伙伴关系有众所周知的好处,但公共部门和私营部门之间的合作有限。在目前的领导下,私营部门对南非将如何公平仍有一些保留意见,这导致私营部门羞于投资和公开与政府合作。战略层面的伙伴关系安排仍然很困难,无法在项目受控的战术层面灌输信心。私营部门需要稳定,才能对投资和与公共部门合作感到有信心。本文着眼于改善公共基础设施发展中的合作伙伴关系的创新方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment
WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment (ISSN: 1743-3541) includes volumes relating to the follow subject areas: Ecology, Environmental Engineering, Water Resources, Air Pollution, Design & Nature, Sustainable Development, Environmental Health
期刊最新文献
CRITICAL DISCUSSION ON BUILDING ENERGY RETROFIT POLICIES ESTABLISHING A CUSTOMIZED FRAMEWORK OF BIM EDUCATION PROGRAMS FOR OWNERS IN SOUTH KOREA CYCLING AS A SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY FORM IN THE MAGNA GRAECIA AREA OF THE CALABRIA REGION, ITALY ROAD AHEAD: SETTING THE BASIS FOR A TRANSFORMED MINIBUS TAXI INDUSTRY IN SOUTH AFRICA INDONESIA’S ENERGY POLICY DYNAMICS: A SUBSTANCE OF COMMITMENT AND CHALLENGE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1