Profesjonalna etyka lekarska: Uzasadnienie jej odrębności oraz miejsca w edukacji etycznej studentów medycyny i lekarzy

IF 0.4 0 PHILOSOPHY Diametros Pub Date : 2021-02-01 DOI:10.33392/DIAM.1471
K. Szewczyk
{"title":"Profesjonalna etyka lekarska: Uzasadnienie jej odrębności oraz miejsca w edukacji etycznej studentów medycyny i lekarzy","authors":"K. Szewczyk","doi":"10.33392/DIAM.1471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the article I prove the separateness of professional medical ethics in three ways: 1. By showing differences between the normative rank of responsibilities (conducts, values and virtues) within general and professional ethics. 2. By justifying affiliation of professional medical ethics within the appropriation model which is a type of applied ethics characterized by its unique properties. 3. By justifying historical professionalism as the ethics that is proper for the medical profession; for this kind of ethical internalism the content of professional ethics is the sole work of medical professional organizations as well as individual doctors. \nIn the final part of the article I reconstruct the actual and postulated relations between professional ethics and professionalism as well as between academic bioethics and public bioethics. The aim of this reconstruction is to indicate the optimal from the perspective of ethical education place of professional ethics within the ethics education system for professionalists.","PeriodicalId":42290,"journal":{"name":"Diametros","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diametros","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33392/DIAM.1471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the article I prove the separateness of professional medical ethics in three ways: 1. By showing differences between the normative rank of responsibilities (conducts, values and virtues) within general and professional ethics. 2. By justifying affiliation of professional medical ethics within the appropriation model which is a type of applied ethics characterized by its unique properties. 3. By justifying historical professionalism as the ethics that is proper for the medical profession; for this kind of ethical internalism the content of professional ethics is the sole work of medical professional organizations as well as individual doctors. In the final part of the article I reconstruct the actual and postulated relations between professional ethics and professionalism as well as between academic bioethics and public bioethics. The aim of this reconstruction is to indicate the optimal from the perspective of ethical education place of professional ethics within the ethics education system for professionalists.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在本文中,我从三个方面证明了职业医学伦理的独立性:1。通过展示一般道德和职业道德中责任(行为、价值观和美德)的规范等级之间的差异。2. 挪用模式是一种具有独特属性的应用伦理学,通过对其隶属关系进行论证。3.通过证明历史专业主义是适合医学职业的道德规范;在这种伦理的内在主义下,职业道德的内容既是医学专业组织的工作,也是医生个人的工作。在文章的最后部分,重构了职业伦理与专业精神、学术生命伦理与公共生命伦理之间的现实关系和预设关系。重构的目的是从伦理教育的角度指出职业道德在职业道德教育体系中的最佳位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diametros
Diametros PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Reklamy eksperymentalnych produktów leczniczych i procedur medycznych w świetle polskiego prawa i etyki mediów Programy poszerzonego dostępu jako źródło danych poznawczych Atheist Therapy: Radical Embodiment in Early Modern Medical Materialism Niebezpieczne związki. Problem bliskości we współczesnej dyskusji nad zasadą podwójnego skutku Expertise, disagreement, and trust in vaccine science and policy. The importance of transparency in a world of experts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1