Storyminds and Readingminds: Cognitive Plots in David Small’s Stitches and Virginia Woolf ’s “In the Orchard”

IF 0.5 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE NARRATIVE Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1353/nar.2023.0000
Melba Cuddy‐Keane, Matthew Martello, Terence Patrick Murphy, Nanna Sophie Zheng, C. Fenton, Tung-An Wei, Jan Alber, B. Richardson, Ellen Peel
{"title":"Storyminds and Readingminds: Cognitive Plots in David Small’s Stitches and Virginia Woolf ’s “In the Orchard”","authors":"Melba Cuddy‐Keane, Matthew Martello, Terence Patrick Murphy, Nanna Sophie Zheng, C. Fenton, Tung-An Wei, Jan Alber, B. Richardson, Ellen Peel","doi":"10.1353/nar.2023.0000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Beginning with Virginia Woolf ’s question, when writing a novel, “Who thinks it?,” this article proposes that behind every storyworld is a storymind whose action constitutes a cognitive plot. Redeploying Gérard Genette’s “narrativization by focalization,” I argue that description is always focalized, focalizing is an act of perception, and unfolding perceptions inscribe narrative paths. Urging increased attention to percepts, my approach supplements James Phelan’s communicative-oriented model of Author-Resources-Audience with a process-oriented model of storymind-reading-mind-reader’s mind. In this model, readingminds vary along a sliding scale between what I term allodeictic (storymind-oriented) and egodeictic (reader-oriented) poles. In David Small’s graphic memoir Stitches, allodeictic location leads readingminds to experience a cognitive plot of therapeutic self-healing enacted in the drawings themselves. In Virginia Woolf ’s “In the Orchard,” three conflicting allodeictic perceptions of a single scene challenge the coherent logic of egodeictic critical frames, until we grasp the storymind’s kaleidoscopic effects. Visualization, I posit, tells stories through embodied cognition, a supposition supported by neural linkages between imagined and actual body experiences. My conclusion summarizes the new dimensions that the construct of storyminds add to rhetorical theory in the areas of plot, readerly participation, narrativity, and ethics.","PeriodicalId":45865,"journal":{"name":"NARRATIVE","volume":"31 1","pages":"1 - 101 - 102 - 105 - 106 - 109 - 25 - 26 - 48 - 49 - 68 - 69 - 88 - 89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NARRATIVE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2023.0000","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT:Beginning with Virginia Woolf ’s question, when writing a novel, “Who thinks it?,” this article proposes that behind every storyworld is a storymind whose action constitutes a cognitive plot. Redeploying Gérard Genette’s “narrativization by focalization,” I argue that description is always focalized, focalizing is an act of perception, and unfolding perceptions inscribe narrative paths. Urging increased attention to percepts, my approach supplements James Phelan’s communicative-oriented model of Author-Resources-Audience with a process-oriented model of storymind-reading-mind-reader’s mind. In this model, readingminds vary along a sliding scale between what I term allodeictic (storymind-oriented) and egodeictic (reader-oriented) poles. In David Small’s graphic memoir Stitches, allodeictic location leads readingminds to experience a cognitive plot of therapeutic self-healing enacted in the drawings themselves. In Virginia Woolf ’s “In the Orchard,” three conflicting allodeictic perceptions of a single scene challenge the coherent logic of egodeictic critical frames, until we grasp the storymind’s kaleidoscopic effects. Visualization, I posit, tells stories through embodied cognition, a supposition supported by neural linkages between imagined and actual body experiences. My conclusion summarizes the new dimensions that the construct of storyminds add to rhetorical theory in the areas of plot, readerly participation, narrativity, and ethics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
故事心与阅读心:大卫·斯莫尔《缝线》与弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫《果园里》的认知情节
摘要:本文从弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫在写小说时提出的“谁在想?”这个问题入手,提出每个故事世界的背后都有一个故事头脑,其行为构成了一个认知情节。重新部署Gérard Genette的“聚焦叙事”,我认为描述总是聚焦的,聚焦是一种感知行为,而展开的感知构成了叙事路径。为了增加对感知的关注,我的方法用故事思维-阅读-心智-读者思维的过程导向模型补充了詹姆斯·费兰的作者-资源-受众的沟通导向模型。在这个模型中,阅读思维在我所说的异指示(以故事思维为导向)和自我指示(以读者为导向)两极之间按滑动比例变化。在大卫·斯莫尔(David Small)的图文回忆录《缝合》(Stitches)中,异指定位引导阅读者体验到绘画中所呈现的治疗性自我修复的认知情节。在弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫(Virginia Woolf)的《果园》(In the Orchard)中,对一个场景的三种相互冲突的异指示感知挑战了自我指示批评框架的连贯逻辑,直到我们掌握了故事头脑的万花筒般的效果。我认为,可视化是通过具体认知告诉故事的,这一假设得到了想象和实际身体体验之间神经联系的支持。我的结论总结了故事心理结构在情节、阅读参与、叙事性和伦理等方面为修辞理论增添的新维度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NARRATIVE
NARRATIVE LITERATURE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊最新文献
Mad about the "Boys"? Desire, Revulsion, and (Mis)Recognition in Varro's Eumenides "To Become a Warrior and a Son to My Father": Aleksandr Aleksandrov's (Nadezhda Durova) Notes of a Cavalry Maiden (1836) as Transgender Autobiography "How to Become a Rock": Non-Human Metaphors as Trans Paranarratives Transforming Paratext: A Transgender Touch across Time in Confessions of the Fox Trans-forming Narratology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1