Aspects of the Coloniality of Knowledge

IF 1.3 Q2 ETHNIC STUDIES Critical Philosophy of Race Pub Date : 2020-02-05 DOI:10.5325/critphilrace.8.1-2.0048

S. Hoagland

引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract:Looking at work on advocacy research, this article raises concerns about researchers, exploring and illustrating four aspects of the Coloniality of Anglo-European knowledge practice possible in such research. It suggests that it is not because we are able to be scholars that we are positioned to develop knowledge of marginalized others; it is because of how we are positioned in relation to marginalized others that we are able to be scholars. This article ends with a suggestion for an epistemic shift.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

知识殖民的各个方面

摘要:本文通过对倡导研究工作的梳理，提出了研究者的关注，并从四个方面探讨了倡导研究中英欧知识实践的殖民性。它表明，并不是因为我们有能力成为学者，我们就有能力发展对边缘化他人的了解;正是因为我们与被边缘化的人的关系，我们才能够成为学者。本文最后提出了一个认识转变的建议。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Critical Philosophy of Race ETHNIC STUDIES-

CiteScore

2.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The critical philosophy of race consists in the philosophical examination of issues raised by the concept of race, the practices and mechanisms of racialization, and the persistence of various forms of racism across the world. Critical philosophy of race is a critical enterprise in three respects: it opposes racism in all its forms; it rejects the pseudosciences of old-fashioned biological racialism; and it denies that anti-racism and anti-racialism summarily eliminate race as a meaningful category of analysis. Critical philosophy of race is a philosophical enterprise because of its engagement with traditional philosophical questions and in its readiness to engage critically some of the traditional answers.