Perceptions of Turkish Nursing Students on Nursing Diagnose

IF 0.3 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences Pub Date : 2022-12-30 DOI:10.33808/clinexphealthsci.951967
Münevver Sönmez, Öznur Gürlek Kısacık
{"title":"Perceptions of Turkish Nursing Students on Nursing Diagnose","authors":"Münevver Sönmez, Öznur Gürlek Kısacık","doi":"10.33808/clinexphealthsci.951967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aimed to determine how Turkish nursing students’ perceived nursing diagnosis.\nMethods: This descriptive and cross-sectional study was carried out with 655 nursing students in the Departments of Nursing in the Health Sciences Faculties of two universities, in the Aegean and western Black Sea Region, between 15 February and 5 April 2020. The Students Information Form and Perceptions of Nursing Diagnosis Scale were used for data collection. The independent samples t-test, one-way ANOVA test, and the Mann-Whitney U-test with Bonferroni-correction were used to determine the differences between the groups. Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine the effects of independent variables\nResults: The mean age of the nursing students was 21.12±1.39; 76.6% of them were female and 36.8% were in the second-year. 53.7% of the nursing students reported that they had difficulty in making nursing diagnoses. The overall Perceptions of Nursing Diagnosis Survey score of the nursing students was found to be 2.46±051. Statistically significant difference was found between Perceptions of Nursing Diagnosis Survey scores in terms of gender (p=0.012), the necessity of nursing diagnosis (p<0.001), and having sufficient knowledge about nursing diagnosis (p=0.019).\nConclusions: The findings of this study have revealed that Turkish nursing students’ perceptions of nursing diagnoses are positive. It is important that use effective teaching methods in teaching nursing diagnoses in fundamental nursing education, to give more importance to nursing diagnoses. It is recommended to plan qualitative studies to in-depth examine students’ perceptions with randomized controlled studies involving innovative educational interventions in the future","PeriodicalId":10192,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.951967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to determine how Turkish nursing students’ perceived nursing diagnosis. Methods: This descriptive and cross-sectional study was carried out with 655 nursing students in the Departments of Nursing in the Health Sciences Faculties of two universities, in the Aegean and western Black Sea Region, between 15 February and 5 April 2020. The Students Information Form and Perceptions of Nursing Diagnosis Scale were used for data collection. The independent samples t-test, one-way ANOVA test, and the Mann-Whitney U-test with Bonferroni-correction were used to determine the differences between the groups. Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine the effects of independent variables Results: The mean age of the nursing students was 21.12±1.39; 76.6% of them were female and 36.8% were in the second-year. 53.7% of the nursing students reported that they had difficulty in making nursing diagnoses. The overall Perceptions of Nursing Diagnosis Survey score of the nursing students was found to be 2.46±051. Statistically significant difference was found between Perceptions of Nursing Diagnosis Survey scores in terms of gender (p=0.012), the necessity of nursing diagnosis (p<0.001), and having sufficient knowledge about nursing diagnosis (p=0.019). Conclusions: The findings of this study have revealed that Turkish nursing students’ perceptions of nursing diagnoses are positive. It is important that use effective teaching methods in teaching nursing diagnoses in fundamental nursing education, to give more importance to nursing diagnoses. It is recommended to plan qualitative studies to in-depth examine students’ perceptions with randomized controlled studies involving innovative educational interventions in the future
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土耳其护生对护理诊断的认知
目的:本研究旨在了解土耳其护生感知护理诊断的情况。方法:在2020年2月15日至4月5日期间,对爱琴海和黑海西部地区两所大学健康科学学院护理系的655名护理专业学生进行了描述性和横断面研究。采用《学生信息表》和《护理诊断感知量表》进行数据收集。采用独立样本t检验、单因素方差分析检验和bonferroni校正的Mann-Whitney u检验确定组间差异。结果:护生的平均年龄为21.12±1.39岁;其中女生占76.6%,二年级占36.8%。53.7%的护生表示在护理诊断方面存在困难。护生护理诊断认知调查总分为2.46±051分。护理诊断认知调查得分在性别(p=0.012)、护理诊断必要性(p<0.001)、护理诊断知识知晓程度(p=0.019)方面差异有统计学意义。结论:本研究结果显示,土耳其护生对护理诊断的认知是积极的。在护理基础教育中,运用有效的教学方法进行护理诊断教学,提高对护理诊断的重视程度是十分重要的。建议在未来策划定性研究,以随机对照研究深入考察学生的认知,包括创新的教育干预措施
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences
Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
期刊最新文献
Percutaneous Cholecystostomy is a Feasible and Safe Option for High-Risk Acute Cholecystitis Patients A New Perspective on the Evaluation of Comorbidity Indices on Survival in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Radiographic Evaluation of the Effect of Vitamin D3 Supplementation on Regeneration of Calvarial Bone Defects in Rats Awareness of the Protective Measures Against Covid-19 among Turkish Dentists: A Questionnaire Survey Otoprotective Mechanisms of Carvone As An Antioxidant Agent Against Ototoxic Damage Caused By Paclitaxel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1