A high efficiency pre-treatment method for elution of pathogenic bacteria in lettuces

IF 3 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Quality and Safety Pub Date : 2022-10-19 DOI:10.1093/fqsafe/fyac060
Xiaoyan Liao, Chunmin Pu, Yan Cui, Yalong Bai, Xianming Shi, Lili Chen
{"title":"A high efficiency pre-treatment method for elution of pathogenic bacteria in lettuces","authors":"Xiaoyan Liao, Chunmin Pu, Yan Cui, Yalong Bai, Xianming Shi, Lili Chen","doi":"10.1093/fqsafe/fyac060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Many current studies on rapid detections of pathogenic bacteria in foods focused on the construction of detection methods, neglecting pre-treatment. In fact, it is also a key step to efficiently elute pathogenic bacteria from food samples for rapid detections, and even, it can determine the success or failure of an assay. In this study, we used Escherichia coli, Salmonella enteritidis and Listeria monocytogenes as model bacteria to compare elution efficiency of different eluants, explore the effect of surfactant, ionic strength, protein (or amino acid and peptide), and enzyme on the recovery rate of bacteria in lettuces, and compare the compound effect caused by multiple of factors. Finally, we developed an efficient bacterial recovery method and confirmed the superiority of this method to analyze the bacterial diversity of the eluants from lettuces. The results showed that the recovery efficiency of Escherichia coli, Salmonella enteritidis and Listeria monocytogenes, which were artificially contaminated with approximately 10 5 CFU/g in lettuces, could reach 94.4%, 90.6% and 93.7% by using 10 mM Tris·HCl (pH 9.5) with 0.1% peptone and 300 U/100 mL of cellulase, and furthermore, the elution efficiency could reach 99.6%, 98.6% and 100% under the aid of a 2 min stomaching. For the lettuce samples only with native bacteria, the recovery rate reached 92.1% for viable aerobic bacteria by this method, being approximately 10% higher than the modified previous method. The bacterial diversity of the eluted solution was analyzed, and the result was significantly improved. Considering these advantages, it is important to improve the elution efficiency to achieve rapid and accurate detection of pathogenic bacteria in lettuces.","PeriodicalId":12427,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Safety","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fqsafe/fyac060","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many current studies on rapid detections of pathogenic bacteria in foods focused on the construction of detection methods, neglecting pre-treatment. In fact, it is also a key step to efficiently elute pathogenic bacteria from food samples for rapid detections, and even, it can determine the success or failure of an assay. In this study, we used Escherichia coli, Salmonella enteritidis and Listeria monocytogenes as model bacteria to compare elution efficiency of different eluants, explore the effect of surfactant, ionic strength, protein (or amino acid and peptide), and enzyme on the recovery rate of bacteria in lettuces, and compare the compound effect caused by multiple of factors. Finally, we developed an efficient bacterial recovery method and confirmed the superiority of this method to analyze the bacterial diversity of the eluants from lettuces. The results showed that the recovery efficiency of Escherichia coli, Salmonella enteritidis and Listeria monocytogenes, which were artificially contaminated with approximately 10 5 CFU/g in lettuces, could reach 94.4%, 90.6% and 93.7% by using 10 mM Tris·HCl (pH 9.5) with 0.1% peptone and 300 U/100 mL of cellulase, and furthermore, the elution efficiency could reach 99.6%, 98.6% and 100% under the aid of a 2 min stomaching. For the lettuce samples only with native bacteria, the recovery rate reached 92.1% for viable aerobic bacteria by this method, being approximately 10% higher than the modified previous method. The bacterial diversity of the eluted solution was analyzed, and the result was significantly improved. Considering these advantages, it is important to improve the elution efficiency to achieve rapid and accurate detection of pathogenic bacteria in lettuces.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种高效的生菜病原菌洗脱预处理方法
目前对食品中病原菌快速检测的研究大多集中在检测方法的构建上,而忽视了前处理。事实上,它也是有效地从食品样品中洗脱致病菌以进行快速检测的关键步骤,甚至可以决定测定的成败。本研究以大肠杆菌、肠炎沙门氏菌和单核增生李斯特菌为模型菌,比较不同洗脱液的洗脱效率,探讨表面活性剂、离子强度、蛋白质(或氨基酸、多肽)、酶对生菜中细菌回收率的影响,比较多种因素的复合效应。最后,我们开发了一种高效的细菌回收方法,并证实了该方法在分析生菜洗脱液细菌多样性方面的优越性。结果表明:采用10 mM Tris·HCl (pH 9.5)、0.1%蛋白胨和300 U/100 mL纤维素酶,对生菜中约10.5 CFU/g人工污染的大肠杆菌、肠炎沙门氏菌和单核增生李斯特菌的回收率分别为94.4%、90.6%和93.7%,在灌胃2 min的条件下,其洗脱效率分别为99.6%、98.6%和100%。对于仅含原生菌的生菜样品,该方法的好氧活菌回收率达到92.1%,比改进前的方法提高了约10%。对洗脱液进行细菌多样性分析,结果有明显改善。考虑到这些优点,提高洗脱效率对实现生菜病原菌的快速准确检测具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Safety
Food Quality and Safety FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
1.80%
发文量
31
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Food quality and safety are the main targets of investigation in food production. Therefore, reliable paths to detect, identify, quantify, characterize and monitor quality and safety issues occurring in food are of great interest. Food Quality and Safety is an open access, international, peer-reviewed journal providing a platform to highlight emerging and innovative science and technology in the agro-food field, publishing up-to-date research in the areas of food quality and safety, food nutrition and human health. It promotes food and health equity which will consequently promote public health and combat diseases. The journal is an effective channel of communication between food scientists, nutritionists, public health professionals, food producers, food marketers, policy makers, governmental and non-governmental agencies, and others concerned with the food safety, nutrition and public health dimensions. The journal accepts original research articles, review papers, technical reports, case studies, conference reports, and book reviews articles.
期刊最新文献
Comparative metabolomics analysis of a unique yellow hawthorn (Crataegus pinnatifida) and red-skinned cultivars reveals a different polyphenol biosynthesis flux and antioxidative and antidiabetic potential Metabolomics for Quality Assessment of Poultry Meat and Eggs Effect of cinnamaldehyde on Rhizopus stolonifer and on the conservation of sweetpotato Tolerance variations and mechanisms of Salmonella enterica serovar Newport in response to long-term hypertonic stress Development of a competitive array for discriminative determination of amphenicols in egg based on ribosomal protein L16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1