The Fertility Outcomes of Egyptian Buffalo Cows after Ovsynch and Presynch-Ovsynch Protocols

M. Othman, Amr Elshalofy, M. Abou-Ahmed, Abdel Raouf Ghallab
{"title":"The Fertility Outcomes of Egyptian Buffalo Cows after Ovsynch and Presynch-Ovsynch Protocols","authors":"M. Othman, Amr Elshalofy, M. Abou-Ahmed, Abdel Raouf Ghallab","doi":"10.21608/javs.2023.218656.1246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study aimed to compare the reproductive outcomes after the blind application of the standard Ovsynch and Presynch Ovsynch protocols on Egyptian Buffaloes ( Bubalus bubalis ) during the breeding season. Fifty multiparous Egyptian buffalo cows of an unknown stage of the estrous cycle were randomly divided into two groups: 1) the standard Ovsynch protocol (first GnRH (G1) at d0, PGF 2 α at d7 , and second GnRH; G2 56 h later and 2) the pre-synch Ovsynch (G6G-Ovsynch) protocol (PGF 2 α and GnRH 2 days apart 6 days before starting G1 of the standard Ovsynch). Cows were subjected to timed artificial insemination (TAI) 16 and 40 h after the G2 injection in both groups. Blood sampling and ovarian transrectal ultrasonography were performed at three time points, PGF2α, G2, and 2 days after G2. Serum progesterone (P 4 ) (ng/mL) concentrations were significantly higher in the G6G-Ovsynch group than in the Ovsynch group at the time of PGF 2 α and two days after the G2 injection, but they were lower (P ˂ 0.05) at the G2 injection. The Vascularity index of the corpus luteum (CL) and dominant follicle (DF) wall area (%) were higher (P ˂ 0.05) in the G6G-Ovsynch group compared to the Ovsynch group. The ovulatory response indicated by the presence of CL at d7 was significantly higher in G6G-Ovsynch than in Ovsynch (73 vs. 51%, respectively). Moreover, a higher (P ˂ 0.05) pregnancy rate was observed in G6G-Ovsynch than in the Ovsynch group. In conclusion, the blind application of the G6G-Ovsynch improved the ovulatory response in the early stages of the synchronization protocol and raised the pregnancy rates in Egyptian buffaloes.","PeriodicalId":15040,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Veterinary Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Veterinary Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/javs.2023.218656.1246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study aimed to compare the reproductive outcomes after the blind application of the standard Ovsynch and Presynch Ovsynch protocols on Egyptian Buffaloes ( Bubalus bubalis ) during the breeding season. Fifty multiparous Egyptian buffalo cows of an unknown stage of the estrous cycle were randomly divided into two groups: 1) the standard Ovsynch protocol (first GnRH (G1) at d0, PGF 2 α at d7 , and second GnRH; G2 56 h later and 2) the pre-synch Ovsynch (G6G-Ovsynch) protocol (PGF 2 α and GnRH 2 days apart 6 days before starting G1 of the standard Ovsynch). Cows were subjected to timed artificial insemination (TAI) 16 and 40 h after the G2 injection in both groups. Blood sampling and ovarian transrectal ultrasonography were performed at three time points, PGF2α, G2, and 2 days after G2. Serum progesterone (P 4 ) (ng/mL) concentrations were significantly higher in the G6G-Ovsynch group than in the Ovsynch group at the time of PGF 2 α and two days after the G2 injection, but they were lower (P ˂ 0.05) at the G2 injection. The Vascularity index of the corpus luteum (CL) and dominant follicle (DF) wall area (%) were higher (P ˂ 0.05) in the G6G-Ovsynch group compared to the Ovsynch group. The ovulatory response indicated by the presence of CL at d7 was significantly higher in G6G-Ovsynch than in Ovsynch (73 vs. 51%, respectively). Moreover, a higher (P ˂ 0.05) pregnancy rate was observed in G6G-Ovsynch than in the Ovsynch group. In conclusion, the blind application of the G6G-Ovsynch improved the ovulatory response in the early stages of the synchronization protocol and raised the pregnancy rates in Egyptian buffaloes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃及水牛在Ovsynch和Presynch-Ovsynch方案后的生育结果
本研究旨在比较埃及水牛(Bubalus bubalis)在繁殖季节盲目应用标准Ovsynch和预同步Ovsynch方案后的繁殖结果。50头处于发情周期未知阶段的埃及产水牛随机分为两组:1)标准ovsync方案(第一次GnRH (G1)在10,PGF 2 α在7,第二次GnRH;G2 56 h后和2)预同步ovsync (g6g - ovsync)方案(PGF 2 α和GnRH间隔2天,标准ovsync开始前6天)。两组奶牛在注射G2后16和40 h进行定时人工授精(TAI)。分别于PGF2α、G2和G2后2天三个时间点采血和卵巢经直肠超声检查。G6G-Ovsynch组大鼠血清孕酮(p4) (ng/mL)浓度在PGF 2 α注射时和G2注射后2 d显著高于Ovsynch组,而在G2注射时低于Ovsynch组(P小于0.05)。G6G-Ovsynch组黄体血管指数(CL)和优势卵泡(DF)壁面积(%)较Ovsynch组高(P小于0.05)。G6G-Ovsynch在第7天的排卵反应明显高于Ovsynch(分别为73%和51%)。此外,G6G-Ovsynch组的妊娠率比Ovsynch组高(P小于0.05)。综上所述,G6G-Ovsynch的盲应用改善了同步方案早期的排卵反应,提高了埃及水牛的受孕率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effect of Applying Clove and Cinnamon Essential Oils to Milk Rice Pudding in Controlling Bacillus cereus and Bacillus subtilis Growth with Respect to the Sensory Traits Effect of Different Fractions of Lawsonia inermis Linn on Haematobiochemical Changes, Osmotic Fragility and Lipid Profile in Streptozotocin-induced Diabetic Wistar Rats Gangrene of the Tongue Develops 48 Hours Following Ovariohysterectomy as a Treatment of Open-Cervix Pyometra in a Bitch Detection of clfA, clfB and coa genes in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated from Nasal Cavity of Cows, Buffalo and their Breeders in Nineveh Governorate, Iaq Effect of Obesity on Awakening Time after Isoflurane/Sevoflurane Inhalation Anesthesia in Dogs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1