Vincenzo Tosco, Riccardo Monterubbianesi, G. Orilisi, M. Procaccini, S. Grandini, A. Putignano, G. Orsini
{"title":"Effect of four different finishing and polishing systems on resin composites: roughness surface and gloss retention evaluations.","authors":"Vincenzo Tosco, Riccardo Monterubbianesi, G. Orilisi, M. Procaccini, S. Grandini, A. Putignano, G. Orsini","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4970.19.04310-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nFinishing and polishing procedures play a crucial role to achieve the best aesthetic result of direct restorations. Many manufacturers to the clinicians offer different finishing and polishing systems. This study aims to examine the behavior of four different finishing and polishing systems on the roughness, gloss and morphology surface of one resin composite.\n\n\nMETHODS\nTwelve Filtek XTE Supreme (3M ESPE) discs were prepared and divided into 4 groups (n=3), depending on the different finishing and polishing systems: Group 1 (GP1) Sof-Lex Extra- Thin XT discs; Group 2 (GP2) Sof-Lex Coarse black disc, multi-fluted bur, Sof-Lex Diamond Polishing System Spirals; Group 3 (GP3) Sof-Lex Coarse black disc, multi-fluted bur, Sof-Lex Diamond Polishing System Spirals, Diamond Twist SCL; Group 4 (GP4) with Sof-Lex Coarse black disc, multi-fluted bur and Occlubrush. The roughness and gloss were evaluated and then samples examined by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) to analyse the morphology after finishing and polishing.\n\n\nRESULTS\nRegarding the surface roughness, GP1 and GP2 showed similar values for Ra, Ry, Rz and Rq parameters; while GP3 displayed the lowest values in all parameters; GP4 had the highest Ra value. Regarding the gloss, the values decreased as follows: GP3>GP2=GP4>GP1 (p<0.05). Scanning electron micrographs showed the abrasion of the samples with an increase in the surfaceroughness in GP1 and GP4. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test was used for statistical evaluations (p<0.05).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe roughness and gloss surface of resin composites depend on the finishing and polishing systems used. This study demonstrates that satisfactory gloss outcomes are obtained using a system based on diamond paste.","PeriodicalId":18742,"journal":{"name":"Minerva stomatologica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva stomatologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4970.19.04310-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Finishing and polishing procedures play a crucial role to achieve the best aesthetic result of direct restorations. Many manufacturers to the clinicians offer different finishing and polishing systems. This study aims to examine the behavior of four different finishing and polishing systems on the roughness, gloss and morphology surface of one resin composite.
METHODS
Twelve Filtek XTE Supreme (3M ESPE) discs were prepared and divided into 4 groups (n=3), depending on the different finishing and polishing systems: Group 1 (GP1) Sof-Lex Extra- Thin XT discs; Group 2 (GP2) Sof-Lex Coarse black disc, multi-fluted bur, Sof-Lex Diamond Polishing System Spirals; Group 3 (GP3) Sof-Lex Coarse black disc, multi-fluted bur, Sof-Lex Diamond Polishing System Spirals, Diamond Twist SCL; Group 4 (GP4) with Sof-Lex Coarse black disc, multi-fluted bur and Occlubrush. The roughness and gloss were evaluated and then samples examined by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) to analyse the morphology after finishing and polishing.
RESULTS
Regarding the surface roughness, GP1 and GP2 showed similar values for Ra, Ry, Rz and Rq parameters; while GP3 displayed the lowest values in all parameters; GP4 had the highest Ra value. Regarding the gloss, the values decreased as follows: GP3>GP2=GP4>GP1 (p<0.05). Scanning electron micrographs showed the abrasion of the samples with an increase in the surfaceroughness in GP1 and GP4. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test was used for statistical evaluations (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
The roughness and gloss surface of resin composites depend on the finishing and polishing systems used. This study demonstrates that satisfactory gloss outcomes are obtained using a system based on diamond paste.
期刊介绍:
The journal Minerva Stomatologica publishes scientific papers on dentistry and maxillo-facial surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, therapeutical notes, special articles and letters to the Editor. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (www.icmje.org). Articles not conforming to international standards will not be considered for acceptance.