O AKTUALNOSTI CASUUM COMMORIENTIUM U RIMSKOM I SUVREMENOM EUROPSKOM PRIVATNOM PRAVU

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW Pravni Vjesnik Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.25234/pv/14341
Mirza Hebib
{"title":"O AKTUALNOSTI CASUUM COMMORIENTIUM U RIMSKOM I SUVREMENOM EUROPSKOM PRIVATNOM PRAVU","authors":"Mirza Hebib","doi":"10.25234/pv/14341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the Roman legal tradition, but also in modern civil law systems, the term commorientes (lat. commorientes) refers to persons who died in the same accident or other danger, standing in a legal position relevant to inheritance law. In connection with the resolution of such situations in the theory of private law, various legal presumptions have been developed since the period of classical Roman law. All these presumptions can be systematized within two basic concepts - the first based on the presumption of survival of subjects and the second based on the presumption of the simultaneous death of subjects. Comparatively, in the development of European private law, there has been a reception of both concepts, with the proviso that over time the concept of simultaneity will almost completely suppress the concept of survival. The paper analyzes the reasons for this. In establishing a link between Roman roots and European private law, special attention is given to the possibility of applying presumptions in cases where there is a certain spatial or temporal distance between the deaths of persons or if a different cause has led to fatal consequences. Ultimately, the paper clearly points to the importance of Roman rules, which can sometimes be fundamental in understanding the institutes of contemporary private law.","PeriodicalId":41100,"journal":{"name":"Pravni Vjesnik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pravni Vjesnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25234/pv/14341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the Roman legal tradition, but also in modern civil law systems, the term commorientes (lat. commorientes) refers to persons who died in the same accident or other danger, standing in a legal position relevant to inheritance law. In connection with the resolution of such situations in the theory of private law, various legal presumptions have been developed since the period of classical Roman law. All these presumptions can be systematized within two basic concepts - the first based on the presumption of survival of subjects and the second based on the presumption of the simultaneous death of subjects. Comparatively, in the development of European private law, there has been a reception of both concepts, with the proviso that over time the concept of simultaneity will almost completely suppress the concept of survival. The paper analyzes the reasons for this. In establishing a link between Roman roots and European private law, special attention is given to the possibility of applying presumptions in cases where there is a certain spatial or temporal distance between the deaths of persons or if a different cause has led to fatal consequences. Ultimately, the paper clearly points to the importance of Roman rules, which can sometimes be fundamental in understanding the institutes of contemporary private law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在罗马法律传统中,以及在现代大陆法系中,公社一词(后期)。“共同体”是指在同一事故或其他危险中死亡,处于与继承法有关的法律地位的人。在私法理论中,关于这种情况的解决,自古典罗马法时期以来就发展出了各种各样的法律假设。所有这些假设都可以归纳为两个基本概念——第一个基于主体生存的假设,第二个基于主体同时死亡的假设。相比之下,在欧洲私法的发展中,这两个概念都得到了接受,但附带条件是,随着时间的推移,同时性的概念将几乎完全压制生存的概念。本文分析了造成这一现象的原因。在确立罗马根源与欧洲私法之间的联系时,特别注意在人的死亡之间存在一定空间或时间距离的情况下或不同原因导致致命后果的情况下适用推定的可能性。最后,本文明确指出罗马规则的重要性,这有时是理解当代私法机构的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
PRIKAZ KNJIGE: BRANKA REŠETAR, KOMENTAR OBITELJSKOG ZAKONA (KNJIGA I.), ORGANIZATOR D.O.O., ZAGREB, 2022. SINTAGME S FUNKCIONALNIM GLAGOLIMA KAO IZAZOV U PREVOĐENJU PRAVNIH TEKSTOVA S NJEMAČKOGA NA HRVATSKI JEZIK OBITELJSKOPRAVNA REGULACIJA CRESKO-OSORSKOG STATUTA IZ 1441. GODINE TROUBLED WATERS : CROATIAN SEASHORE AS RES EXTRA COMMERCIUM IN COMMERCIO NAGODBA (PORAVNANJE) KAO POSEBNI INSTITUT UGOVORNOG PRAVA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1