Improving Traffic Incident Management Using Team Cognitive Work Analysis

IF 2.2 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.1177/1555343419882595
Vanessa Cattermole-Terzic, T. Horberry
{"title":"Improving Traffic Incident Management Using Team Cognitive Work Analysis","authors":"Vanessa Cattermole-Terzic, T. Horberry","doi":"10.1177/1555343419882595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effective traffic incident management requires separate responder agencies, with different and sometimes competing priorities and purposes, to come together as a team. Their priorities include optimizing casualty outcomes, minimizing the disruption to the flow of traffic, and maintaining responder team safety. In this study, team Cognitive Work Analysis was used in a desktop exercise setting to analyze a complex traffic incident management exercise. The study investigated decisions made at the scene of an incident to determine system issues and system support solutions. Participants were all senior officers and decision makers in traffic incident management environments. Results indicated that team Cognitive Work Analysis was highly beneficial in determining gaps in team coordination, communication, and structures. Information regarding shared and not shared work elements between agencies highlighted novel coordination and education requirements within and between agencies, such as disparate priorities at the scene creating the risk of interoperability issues. Analyses of operational, coordination, and structural strategies offered new insights into the traffic incident management work domain and recommendations for improvements to the safety and performance of the overall traffic incident management system.","PeriodicalId":46342,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1555343419882595","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343419882595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Effective traffic incident management requires separate responder agencies, with different and sometimes competing priorities and purposes, to come together as a team. Their priorities include optimizing casualty outcomes, minimizing the disruption to the flow of traffic, and maintaining responder team safety. In this study, team Cognitive Work Analysis was used in a desktop exercise setting to analyze a complex traffic incident management exercise. The study investigated decisions made at the scene of an incident to determine system issues and system support solutions. Participants were all senior officers and decision makers in traffic incident management environments. Results indicated that team Cognitive Work Analysis was highly beneficial in determining gaps in team coordination, communication, and structures. Information regarding shared and not shared work elements between agencies highlighted novel coordination and education requirements within and between agencies, such as disparate priorities at the scene creating the risk of interoperability issues. Analyses of operational, coordination, and structural strategies offered new insights into the traffic incident management work domain and recommendations for improvements to the safety and performance of the overall traffic incident management system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用团队认知工作分析改进交通事故管理
有效的交通事故管理需要有不同的、有时是相互竞争的优先事项和目的的不同的响应机构作为一个团队团结起来。他们的首要任务包括优化伤亡结果,最大限度地减少对交通流量的干扰,以及维护响应团队的安全。在本研究中,团队认知工作分析在桌面练习设置分析复杂的交通事故管理练习。该研究调查了在事件现场做出的决定,以确定系统问题和系统支持解决方案。参加者均为交通事故管理部门的高级人员及决策者。结果表明,团队认知工作分析在确定团队协调、沟通和结构方面的差距方面非常有益。关于机构之间共享和不共享工作要素的信息突出了机构内部和机构之间新的协调和教育要求,例如现场不同的优先事项造成互操作性问题的风险。对运作、协调和结构策略的分析,为交通事故管理工作领域提供了新的见解,并为改善整个交通事故管理系统的安全和表现提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Introduction to the Special Issue on Automation Failure Augmenting Human Cognition With a Digital Submarine Periscope Get on the Round Dial: Fighter Pilot Strategies for Recovering Situation Awareness After Disorienting Physiological Events Distinguishing Urgent From Non-urgent Communications: A Mixed Methods Study of Communication Technology Use in Perinatal Care Wrong, Strong, and Silent: What Happens when Automated Systems With High Autonomy and High Authority Misbehave?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1