L. Zogheib, G. Lopes, J. Matos, Dan Castro, M. Bottino, J. Mccabe, E. Kimpara
{"title":"Effect of neutralization and hydrofluoric acid precipitate remotion on the compressive strength of monolithic lithium disilicate crowns.","authors":"L. Zogheib, G. Lopes, J. Matos, Dan Castro, M. Bottino, J. Mccabe, E. Kimpara","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4970.20.04330-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThe cleaning protocol for the ceramic surface after acid etching resulted in a decrease in bond strength and flexural strength of a glass ceramic. This study aims to evaluate the effect of different ceramic surface treatments after hydrofluoric acid etching (HF) on the compressive strength of monolithic lithium disilicate crowns.\n\n\nMETHODS\nForty (40) human third molars received conventional full coverage preparation. After performing digital impressions of teeth preparations, ceramic blocks were machined using a CAD/CAM system in order to obtain the crowns. The crowns were distributed in 4 groups as ceramic surface treatment (n=10): (HF) - 4.9% HF for 20s + air-water spray for 30s; (HFN) - HF + neutralizing agent for 5 min (N); (HFU) - HF + ultrasonic bath for 5 min (U); e (HFNU) - HF + N + U. SEM and EDS analysis was performed in each group in order to characterize the ceramic surface and to verify the chemical element distribution after HF cleaning protocols. A silane layer was applied (for 60s), and crowns were then cemented with dual resin cement. A compressive load was applied on the middle of the occlusal crown surface with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until fracture. Data were analysed using ANOVA and Tukey test (α=0.05).\n\n\nRESULTS\nFluoride ions were found in samples of all post-etching cleaning protocols. The mean value (Kgf) was: HF = 169.92 ± 21.37; HFN = 187.34 ± 34.79; HFU = 166.63 ± 40.22 and HFNU = 175.26 ± 40.22. The ceramic surface treatment after HF etching did not significantly influence (p>0.05) the compressive strength of the tested ceramic crowns.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nSurface treatments with neutralizing agent associated with the ultrasonic bath as the pre-cementation protocol was the most efficient protocol in eliminating the precipitate deposited on the porosities created by acid etching.","PeriodicalId":18742,"journal":{"name":"Minerva stomatologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva stomatologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4970.20.04330-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The cleaning protocol for the ceramic surface after acid etching resulted in a decrease in bond strength and flexural strength of a glass ceramic. This study aims to evaluate the effect of different ceramic surface treatments after hydrofluoric acid etching (HF) on the compressive strength of monolithic lithium disilicate crowns.
METHODS
Forty (40) human third molars received conventional full coverage preparation. After performing digital impressions of teeth preparations, ceramic blocks were machined using a CAD/CAM system in order to obtain the crowns. The crowns were distributed in 4 groups as ceramic surface treatment (n=10): (HF) - 4.9% HF for 20s + air-water spray for 30s; (HFN) - HF + neutralizing agent for 5 min (N); (HFU) - HF + ultrasonic bath for 5 min (U); e (HFNU) - HF + N + U. SEM and EDS analysis was performed in each group in order to characterize the ceramic surface and to verify the chemical element distribution after HF cleaning protocols. A silane layer was applied (for 60s), and crowns were then cemented with dual resin cement. A compressive load was applied on the middle of the occlusal crown surface with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until fracture. Data were analysed using ANOVA and Tukey test (α=0.05).
RESULTS
Fluoride ions were found in samples of all post-etching cleaning protocols. The mean value (Kgf) was: HF = 169.92 ± 21.37; HFN = 187.34 ± 34.79; HFU = 166.63 ± 40.22 and HFNU = 175.26 ± 40.22. The ceramic surface treatment after HF etching did not significantly influence (p>0.05) the compressive strength of the tested ceramic crowns.
CONCLUSIONS
Surface treatments with neutralizing agent associated with the ultrasonic bath as the pre-cementation protocol was the most efficient protocol in eliminating the precipitate deposited on the porosities created by acid etching.
期刊介绍:
The journal Minerva Stomatologica publishes scientific papers on dentistry and maxillo-facial surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, therapeutical notes, special articles and letters to the Editor. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (www.icmje.org). Articles not conforming to international standards will not be considered for acceptance.