Some Challenges for Research on Emotion and Moral Judgment: The Moral Foreign-Language Effect as a Case Study

IF 0.4 0 PHILOSOPHY Diametros Pub Date : 2020-05-12 DOI:10.33392/diam.1476
S. McFarlane, Heather Cipolletti Perez
{"title":"Some Challenges for Research on Emotion and Moral Judgment: The Moral Foreign-Language Effect as a Case Study","authors":"S. McFarlane, Heather Cipolletti Perez","doi":"10.33392/diam.1476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we discuss a number of challenges with the empirical study of emotion and its relation to moral judgment. We examine a case study involving the moral foreign-language effect, according to which people show an increased utilitarian response tendency in moral dilemmas when using their non-native language. One important proposed explanation for this effect is that using one’s non-native language reduces emotional arousal, and that reduced emotion is responsible for this tendency. We offer reasons to think that there is insufficient evidence for accepting this explanation at present. We argue that there are three themes that constrain our current ability to draw firm empirical conclusions: 1) the frequent use of proxies or partial measures for emotions, 2) the lack of a predictive and generalizable theory of emotion and specific emotion-types, and 3) the obscurity of a baseline level of neutrality with respect to participant emotion. These lessons apply not only to research on the moral foreign-language effect, but to empirical research in moral psychology more generally. ","PeriodicalId":42290,"journal":{"name":"Diametros","volume":"17 1","pages":"56-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diametros","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33392/diam.1476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In this article, we discuss a number of challenges with the empirical study of emotion and its relation to moral judgment. We examine a case study involving the moral foreign-language effect, according to which people show an increased utilitarian response tendency in moral dilemmas when using their non-native language. One important proposed explanation for this effect is that using one’s non-native language reduces emotional arousal, and that reduced emotion is responsible for this tendency. We offer reasons to think that there is insufficient evidence for accepting this explanation at present. We argue that there are three themes that constrain our current ability to draw firm empirical conclusions: 1) the frequent use of proxies or partial measures for emotions, 2) the lack of a predictive and generalizable theory of emotion and specific emotion-types, and 3) the obscurity of a baseline level of neutrality with respect to participant emotion. These lessons apply not only to research on the moral foreign-language effect, but to empirical research in moral psychology more generally. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情感与道德判断研究面临的挑战——以道德外语效应为例
在这篇文章中,我们讨论了一些挑战与情感的实证研究及其与道德判断的关系。我们研究了一个涉及道德外语效应的案例研究,根据该案例研究,人们在使用非母语时表现出更大的功利主义反应倾向。对这种效应的一个重要解释是,使用非母语会减少情绪的激发,而情绪的减少是造成这种趋势的原因。我们提出理由认为,目前没有足够的证据来接受这种解释。我们认为,有三个主题限制了我们目前得出坚定实证结论的能力:1)频繁使用代理或部分情绪测量,2)缺乏预测和概括的情绪和特定情绪类型理论,以及3)关于参与者情绪的中立基线水平的模糊。这些经验教训不仅适用于道德外语效应的研究,而且更广泛地适用于道德心理学的实证研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diametros
Diametros PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Reklamy eksperymentalnych produktów leczniczych i procedur medycznych w świetle polskiego prawa i etyki mediów Programy poszerzonego dostępu jako źródło danych poznawczych Atheist Therapy: Radical Embodiment in Early Modern Medical Materialism Niebezpieczne związki. Problem bliskości we współczesnej dyskusji nad zasadą podwójnego skutku Expertise, disagreement, and trust in vaccine science and policy. The importance of transparency in a world of experts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1