Clinical Efficacy of Dienogest and Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System in the Treatment of Adenomyosis

Yang Xu, Li Li, Guixia Yang
{"title":"Clinical Efficacy of Dienogest and Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System in the Treatment of Adenomyosis","authors":"Yang Xu, Li Li, Guixia Yang","doi":"10.26689/jcnr.v6i5.4213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of dienogest and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in the treatment of adenomyosis. Methods: A total of 60 cases of adenomyosis admitted to Dezhou Women and Children’s Hospital from January 2020 to October 2021 were selected and randomly divided into two groups (Group A and Group B), which were initiated on dienogest and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, respectively. The therapeutic effects and adverse reactions of the two groups were analyzed. Results: After 6 months of treatment, the uterine volume in the LNG-IUS group reduced slightly compared with that before treatment, with no statistical significance (p > 0.05), while that in the DNG group increased slightly compared with that before treatment, with no statistical significance (p > 0.05). After 6 months of treatment, the hemoglobin of patients in both groups increased compared with that before treatment; there was no significant difference in the DNG group (p > 0.05), but there was significant difference in the LNG-IUS group (p < 0.01). After 6 months of treatment, the VAS scores of the two groups were significantly lower than those before treatment (p < 0.01); the serum CA125 level in both groups decreased significantly compared with that before treatment (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Mirena (levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system) has better therapeutic effect on adenomyosis and fewer adverse reactions than deinogest.","PeriodicalId":64151,"journal":{"name":"临床护理研究","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"临床护理研究","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26689/jcnr.v6i5.4213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of dienogest and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in the treatment of adenomyosis. Methods: A total of 60 cases of adenomyosis admitted to Dezhou Women and Children’s Hospital from January 2020 to October 2021 were selected and randomly divided into two groups (Group A and Group B), which were initiated on dienogest and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, respectively. The therapeutic effects and adverse reactions of the two groups were analyzed. Results: After 6 months of treatment, the uterine volume in the LNG-IUS group reduced slightly compared with that before treatment, with no statistical significance (p > 0.05), while that in the DNG group increased slightly compared with that before treatment, with no statistical significance (p > 0.05). After 6 months of treatment, the hemoglobin of patients in both groups increased compared with that before treatment; there was no significant difference in the DNG group (p > 0.05), but there was significant difference in the LNG-IUS group (p < 0.01). After 6 months of treatment, the VAS scores of the two groups were significantly lower than those before treatment (p < 0.01); the serum CA125 level in both groups decreased significantly compared with that before treatment (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Mirena (levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system) has better therapeutic effect on adenomyosis and fewer adverse reactions than deinogest.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
炔诺孕酮和左炔诺孕酮释放宫内系统治疗乙型脑出血的临床疗效
目的:比较地诺孕酮与左炔诺孕酮释放宫内系统治疗乙型脑出血的临床疗效及不良反应。方法:选择2020年1月至2021年10月在德州妇幼医院收治的子宫腺肌症患者60例,随机分为A组和B组,分别开始使用地诺孕酮和左炔诺孕酮释放宫内系统。分析两组患者的治疗效果及不良反应。结果:治疗6个月后,LNG-IUS组子宫体积较治疗前略有缩小,差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05); DNG组子宫体积较治疗前略有增大,差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。治疗6个月后,两组患者血红蛋白均较治疗前升高;DNG组间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05), LNG-IUS组间差异有统计学意义(p < 0.01)。治疗6个月后,两组患者VAS评分均显著低于治疗前(p < 0.01);两组患者血清CA125水平均较治疗前显著降低(p < 0.01)。结论:mrena(释放左炔诺孕酮的宫内系统)治疗子宫腺肌症疗效好,不良反应少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
236
期刊最新文献
The Effect of the Early Application of Tirofiban on Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS) after Intravenous Thrombolysis with Urokinase Analysis of the Effect of Hormone Therapy Combined with Hydroxychloroquine in the Treatment of IgA Nephropathy Statistical Analysis and Countermeasures for Specimen Rejection in the Emergency Department Exploring the Mechanism of Circ-vgll3 in Osteogenically Differentiated Human Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Predictive Value of Serum pgRNA on HBeAg Clearance in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B with Low HBeAg Levels Treated with Pegylated Interferon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1