Feng Zechen, Ma Yongzhong, W. Hongfang, Su Yaru, Zhang Zhibin, Lou Yun
{"title":"Output dose investigation and analysis of external beam radiotherapy in Beijing","authors":"Feng Zechen, Ma Yongzhong, W. Hongfang, Su Yaru, Zhang Zhibin, Lou Yun","doi":"10.13491/J.ISSN.1004-714X.2021.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To study the output dose of external beam radiotherapy in Beijing and analyze the\n cause of output dose deviation. Guidance is given on the selection of measurement\n methods, calculation formulas and parameters.\n Methods During 2020, the output doses of medical electron accelerators, tomotherapy, cyberknife,\n and γ-knife were measured based on the water absorbed dose calibration factor combined\n with the requirements in the IAEA TRS398 and TRS483 reports, and low-energy X-rays\n were measured based on the air kerma calibration factor combined with the requirements\n in the AAPM protocal. The output dose was measured and compared with the preset irradiation\n value.\n Results A total of 59 external beam radiation therapy equipments’s output dose were investigated.\n 2 of the 49 accelerators’s absolute value of relative deviation between the system\n indication value and the measurement exceeded 3%; the deviation of other external\n beam radiotherapy equipments was less than 3%.\n Conclusion A unified method and multi-party quality control can ensure the accuracy of the output\n dose. In the routine operation of the equipment, the hospital should strictly implement\n periodic inspections to ensure accurate and reliable radiotherapy.\n 摘要: 目的 调查北京地方所属外照射放射治疗设备输出剂量的情况, 分析输出剂量相对偏差原因, 明确测量方法、 计算公式及参数的选取。\n 方法 2020 年期间, 采用水中吸收剂量校准因子结合国际原子能机构 (IAEA) TRS398 和 TRS483 号报告中的要求对医用电子加速器、螺旋断层放射治疗装置、机械臂放射治疗装置、\n γ 射线立体定向放射治疗 系统的输出剂量进行测量, 采用空气比释动能校准因子结合 AAPM 方案中的要求对低能 X 射线治疗机的输出剂量进 行测量, 并与预置照射值进行比较分析输出剂量相对偏差。\n 结果共调查了 59 台外照射放射治疗设备的输出剂量, 49 台医用电子加速器中 2 台输出剂量相对偏差绝对值超过 3%; 其他外照射放射治疗设备的输出剂量相对偏差绝对值\n 均小于 3%。\n 结论 统一明确的测量方法和多方的质量控制检测可确保放射治疗设备输出剂量的准确, 在设备常规运 行中医院应严格执行周期性检验保证实施精确可靠的放射治疗。","PeriodicalId":58844,"journal":{"name":"中国辐射卫生","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国辐射卫生","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13491/J.ISSN.1004-714X.2021.02.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective To study the output dose of external beam radiotherapy in Beijing and analyze the
cause of output dose deviation. Guidance is given on the selection of measurement
methods, calculation formulas and parameters.
Methods During 2020, the output doses of medical electron accelerators, tomotherapy, cyberknife,
and γ-knife were measured based on the water absorbed dose calibration factor combined
with the requirements in the IAEA TRS398 and TRS483 reports, and low-energy X-rays
were measured based on the air kerma calibration factor combined with the requirements
in the AAPM protocal. The output dose was measured and compared with the preset irradiation
value.
Results A total of 59 external beam radiation therapy equipments’s output dose were investigated.
2 of the 49 accelerators’s absolute value of relative deviation between the system
indication value and the measurement exceeded 3%; the deviation of other external
beam radiotherapy equipments was less than 3%.
Conclusion A unified method and multi-party quality control can ensure the accuracy of the output
dose. In the routine operation of the equipment, the hospital should strictly implement
periodic inspections to ensure accurate and reliable radiotherapy.
摘要: 目的 调查北京地方所属外照射放射治疗设备输出剂量的情况, 分析输出剂量相对偏差原因, 明确测量方法、 计算公式及参数的选取。
方法 2020 年期间, 采用水中吸收剂量校准因子结合国际原子能机构 (IAEA) TRS398 和 TRS483 号报告中的要求对医用电子加速器、螺旋断层放射治疗装置、机械臂放射治疗装置、
γ 射线立体定向放射治疗 系统的输出剂量进行测量, 采用空气比释动能校准因子结合 AAPM 方案中的要求对低能 X 射线治疗机的输出剂量进 行测量, 并与预置照射值进行比较分析输出剂量相对偏差。
结果共调查了 59 台外照射放射治疗设备的输出剂量, 49 台医用电子加速器中 2 台输出剂量相对偏差绝对值超过 3%; 其他外照射放射治疗设备的输出剂量相对偏差绝对值
均小于 3%。
结论 统一明确的测量方法和多方的质量控制检测可确保放射治疗设备输出剂量的准确, 在设备常规运 行中医院应严格执行周期性检验保证实施精确可靠的放射治疗。
Objective To study the output dose of external beam radiation in Beijing and analyze the cause of output dose deviation Guidance is given on the selection of measurement methods, calculation formulas and parameters Methods During 2020, the output doses of medical electron accelerators, tomotherapy, cyberknife, and γ- Know were measured based on the water absorbed dose calibration factor combined with the requirements in the IAEA TRS398 and TRS483 reports, and low energy X-rays were measured based on the air kernel calibration factor combined with the requirements in the AAPM protocol The output did was measured and compared with the preset radiation value Results A total of 59 external beam radiation therapy equipment's output did not have been invested 2 of the 49 accelerators' absolute value of relative deviation between the system indication value and the measurement exceeded 3%; The deviation of other external beam radiation equipment was less than 3% Conclusion A unified method and multi party quality control can ensure the accuracy of the output dose In the routing operation of the equipment, the hospital should strictly implement periodic inspections to ensure accuracy and related radiation Abstract: Objective: To investigate the output dose of external radiation therapy equipment in Beijing, analyze the reasons for the relative deviation of output dose, and clarify the selection of measurement methods, calculation formulas, and parameters. During the period of 2020, the calibration factor for absorbed dose in water was used in conjunction with the requirements of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reports TRS398 and TRS483 for medical electron accelerators, spiral tomography radiotherapy devices, robotic arm radiotherapy devices γ The output dose of the X-ray stereotactic radiotherapy system is measured, using an air specific release energy calibration factor combined with the requirements of the AAPM scheme to measure the output dose of the low-energy X-ray therapy machine, and comparing and analyzing the relative deviation of the output dose with the preset exposure value. The results showed that a total of 59 external radiation therapy equipment were investigated for their output doses, and 2 out of 49 medical electron accelerators had relative deviation absolute values of output doses exceeding 3%; The absolute deviation of the output dose of other external radiation therapy equipment is less than 3%. Conclusion: A unified and clear measurement method and multi-party quality control testing can ensure the accuracy of the output dose of radiation therapy equipment. Traditional Chinese medicine hospitals should strictly implement periodic testing during the routine operation of the equipment to ensure the implementation of accurate and reliable radiation therapy.
期刊介绍:
Chinese Journal of Radiological Health is one of the Source Journals for Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers and Citations and belongs to the series published by Chinese Preventive Medicine Association (CPMA). It is a national academic journal supervised by National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China and co-sponsored by Institute of Radiation Medicine, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences and CPMA, and is a professional academic journal publishing research findings and management experience in the field of radiological health, issued to the public in China and abroad. Under the guidance of the Communist Party of China and the national press and publication policies, the Journal actively publicizes the guidelines and policies of the Party and the state on health work, promotes the implementation of relevant laws, regulations and standards, and timely reports new achievements, new information, new methods and new products in the specialty, with the aim of organizing and promoting the academic communication of radiological health in China and improving the academic level of the specialty, and for the purpose of protecting the health of radiation workers and the public while promoting the extensive use of radioisotopes and radiation devices in the national economy. The main columns include Original Articles, Expert Comments, Experience Exchange, Standards and Guidelines, and Review Articles.