Lafẓ “Al-Auliyā'” baina an-Naṣṣ wa al-Wāqi‘: Dirāsah Dalāliyyah

Hatta Raharja
{"title":"Lafẓ “Al-Auliyā'” baina an-Naṣṣ wa al-Wāqi‘: Dirāsah Dalāliyyah","authors":"Hatta Raharja","doi":"10.32678/alfaz.vol10.iss1.8170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the condition of Jakarta's residents in late 2016 and early 2017. Some Muslims in Jakarta were able to mobilize a movement they dubbed \"Aksi Bela Islam\" after viewing video recordings of the then-leader's words that were distributed via media networks and other means. They may have clashed after viewing the footage, prompting Jakartans, organizations, and associations to convene and ask the Indonesian Ulema Council to address the issue. The respondents requested the opinion of the Indonesian Ulema Council regarding the ruler's statement, “... that you deny verse 51 of Surah Al-Mā'idah ..,” where the controversial word is “auliyā'” The words have multiple meanings due to the fact that they themselves have multiple meanings. These words have multiple meanings, as interpreters may interpret them differently, and there are also contradictions and contradictions between litigants and justices in interpreting these words. From this point on, the researcher will seek linguistic issues associated with this incident and avoid mentioning political issues. The researcher analyzes it by analyzing the elements of semantic meaning with the aid of the opinions of commentators and translators regarding the verse in question, the dictionaries considered, and the words of scholars who support and do not support the interpretation. This article will inform you of the tendency of the Indonesian Ulema Council to issue fatwas on linguistic matters.","PeriodicalId":34149,"journal":{"name":"Arabic Literatures for Academic Zealots","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arabic Literatures for Academic Zealots","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32678/alfaz.vol10.iss1.8170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the condition of Jakarta's residents in late 2016 and early 2017. Some Muslims in Jakarta were able to mobilize a movement they dubbed "Aksi Bela Islam" after viewing video recordings of the then-leader's words that were distributed via media networks and other means. They may have clashed after viewing the footage, prompting Jakartans, organizations, and associations to convene and ask the Indonesian Ulema Council to address the issue. The respondents requested the opinion of the Indonesian Ulema Council regarding the ruler's statement, “... that you deny verse 51 of Surah Al-Mā'idah ..,” where the controversial word is “auliyā'” The words have multiple meanings due to the fact that they themselves have multiple meanings. These words have multiple meanings, as interpreters may interpret them differently, and there are also contradictions and contradictions between litigants and justices in interpreting these words. From this point on, the researcher will seek linguistic issues associated with this incident and avoid mentioning political issues. The researcher analyzes it by analyzing the elements of semantic meaning with the aid of the opinions of commentators and translators regarding the verse in question, the dictionaries considered, and the words of scholars who support and do not support the interpretation. This article will inform you of the tendency of the Indonesian Ulema Council to issue fatwas on linguistic matters.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本文考察了2016年底和2017年初雅加达居民的状况。雅加达的一些穆斯林在观看了通过媒体网络和其他方式传播的当时领导人讲话的录像后,能够动员他们称之为“Aksi Bela Islam”的运动。他们可能在看了视频后发生了冲突,促使雅加达人、组织和协会召开会议,要求印尼乌里玛委员会解决这个问题。答复者要求印度尼西亚乌里玛理事会就统治者的声明发表意见,“……你否认古兰经第51节…,其中有争议的词是“auliyha”,这些词有多种含义,因为它们本身就有多种含义。这些词具有多重含义,因为口译员可能会对其进行不同的解释,并且在解释这些词时,当事人与法官之间也存在着矛盾和矛盾。从这一点开始,研究者将寻求与此事件相关的语言问题,避免提及政治问题。研究者通过对语义要素的分析,结合评论家和译者对所讨论的诗句的看法,所考虑的词典,以及支持和不支持这种解释的学者的言论。这篇文章将告诉你印尼乌里玛委员会在语言问题上发布教令的倾向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Al-insya’ Atholabi Fi Surat Al-Hujurat (Dirasah Tahliliyah Balaghiyah) Kesejajaran Realitas Ra’aytu Ramallah karya Mourid Barghouti dan Sejarah Palestina (Tinjauan Strukturalisme Genetik) al-Ibda’at fi Intaji al-A’mal al-Adabiyyah al-Arabiyyah Khilala ‘Ashri at-Tssaurah as-Shina’iyyah ar-Rabi’ah Mausīqā al-Syi‘ri fī Dīwān al-Rāfi‘ī li Muṣṭafā Ṣādiq al-Rāfi‘ī (Dirāsah Taḥlīliyyah ‘Arūḍiyyah wa Qāfawiyyah) Implikasi Teologis Kosakata Mu’arrab dalam Al-Qur’an
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1