Young Joo Kim, Carley Overman, Brooke Davis, Kimberly Fitzgerald, Samantha McLawhorn
{"title":"Inpatient rehabilitation patients are more active during rehabilitation times and days than non-rehabilitation times and days: An observational study","authors":"Young Joo Kim, Carley Overman, Brooke Davis, Kimberly Fitzgerald, Samantha McLawhorn","doi":"10.1177/03080226231176412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The effectiveness of inpatient rehabilitation services has been well supported. However, patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation may be physically inactive outside of therapy. The primary objectives were to determine differences in activity levels between rehabilitation time and non-rehabilitation time and rehabilitation day and non-rehabilitation day during inpatient rehabilitation stay. The secondary objective was to determine differences among rehabilitation services. Methods: In all, 50 participants wore an ActiGraph GT9X Link on their non-dominant wrist during their inpatient rehabilitation stay. Results: We found significant differences in total activity counts between rehabilitation time and non-rehabilitation time (z = 6.15, p < 0.001) and between rehabilitation day and non-rehabilitation day (z = 5.82, p < 0.001). We found significant differences in total activity counts between occupational therapy and physical therapy (z = 5.71, p < 0.001), occupational therapy and speech-language pathology (z = 3.41, p < 0.001), and physical therapy and speech-language pathology (z = 3.07, p = 0.002). The degrees of all differences were large. Conclusion: To increase the activity levels during non-rehabilitation times and days, patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation may benefit from strategies which increase activity levels such as an individualized program that can be safely and independently performed outside of rehabilitation sessions.","PeriodicalId":49096,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"86 1","pages":"697 - 704"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03080226231176412","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The effectiveness of inpatient rehabilitation services has been well supported. However, patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation may be physically inactive outside of therapy. The primary objectives were to determine differences in activity levels between rehabilitation time and non-rehabilitation time and rehabilitation day and non-rehabilitation day during inpatient rehabilitation stay. The secondary objective was to determine differences among rehabilitation services. Methods: In all, 50 participants wore an ActiGraph GT9X Link on their non-dominant wrist during their inpatient rehabilitation stay. Results: We found significant differences in total activity counts between rehabilitation time and non-rehabilitation time (z = 6.15, p < 0.001) and between rehabilitation day and non-rehabilitation day (z = 5.82, p < 0.001). We found significant differences in total activity counts between occupational therapy and physical therapy (z = 5.71, p < 0.001), occupational therapy and speech-language pathology (z = 3.41, p < 0.001), and physical therapy and speech-language pathology (z = 3.07, p = 0.002). The degrees of all differences were large. Conclusion: To increase the activity levels during non-rehabilitation times and days, patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation may benefit from strategies which increase activity levels such as an individualized program that can be safely and independently performed outside of rehabilitation sessions.
期刊介绍:
British Journal of Occupational Therapy (BJOT) is the official journal of the Royal College of Occupational Therapists. Its purpose is to publish articles with international relevance that advance knowledge in research, practice, education, and management in occupational therapy. It is a monthly peer reviewed publication that disseminates evidence on the effectiveness, benefit, and value of occupational therapy so that occupational therapists, service users, and key stakeholders can make informed decisions. BJOT publishes research articles, reviews, practice analyses, opinion pieces, editorials, letters to the editor and book reviews. It also regularly publishes special issues on topics relevant to occupational therapy.