Inter-organisational collaboration and knowledge-work: a contingency framework and evidence from a megaproject in Spain

IF 3.2 4区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Knowledge Management Research & Practice Pub Date : 2022-01-21 DOI:10.1080/14778238.2022.2027827
E. Hetemi, Joaquín B. Ordieres Meré, Cali Nuur
{"title":"Inter-organisational collaboration and knowledge-work: a contingency framework and evidence from a megaproject in Spain","authors":"E. Hetemi, Joaquín B. Ordieres Meré, Cali Nuur","doi":"10.1080/14778238.2022.2027827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper provides an exploratory understanding of the process of knowledge-work in the inter-organisational setting of a large-scale infrastructure project. Taking a process perspective, it explores why an autonomous project-owner organisation in the rail industry sector finds difficulties to transform and exploit the project network-related knowledge in a coopetitive context. The paper builds on a case study of a High-speed Rail Line (HSL) project in Spain. Based on the longitudinal qualitative secondary analysis, the authors put forth a contingency framework that proposes four contexts linking the transformation and exploitation of the knowledge from the inter-organisational network to the project-owner organisation; whether (i) the interplay between industrial setting and the project arrangement empowers product or process knowledge and (ii) the senior, and programme management awareness to feed-forward learning relies on individual- or institutionalised-based learning. These four contexts and their underlying conditions pose different knowledge-work related problems and suggest implications for practice in inter-organisational collaboration and beyond.","PeriodicalId":51497,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge Management Research & Practice","volume":"20 1","pages":"641 - 653"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge Management Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2022.2027827","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper provides an exploratory understanding of the process of knowledge-work in the inter-organisational setting of a large-scale infrastructure project. Taking a process perspective, it explores why an autonomous project-owner organisation in the rail industry sector finds difficulties to transform and exploit the project network-related knowledge in a coopetitive context. The paper builds on a case study of a High-speed Rail Line (HSL) project in Spain. Based on the longitudinal qualitative secondary analysis, the authors put forth a contingency framework that proposes four contexts linking the transformation and exploitation of the knowledge from the inter-organisational network to the project-owner organisation; whether (i) the interplay between industrial setting and the project arrangement empowers product or process knowledge and (ii) the senior, and programme management awareness to feed-forward learning relies on individual- or institutionalised-based learning. These four contexts and their underlying conditions pose different knowledge-work related problems and suggest implications for practice in inter-organisational collaboration and beyond.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织间协作和知识工作:来自西班牙大型项目的应急框架和证据
摘要本文对大型基础设施项目跨组织环境中的知识工作过程进行了探索性的理解。从过程的角度,它探讨了为什么铁路行业的自主项目所有者组织在合作竞争的背景下难以转化和利用项目网络相关知识。本文建立在西班牙高速铁路项目的案例研究基础上。在纵向定性二次分析的基础上,作者提出了一个应急框架,提出了四个背景,将知识从组织间网络到项目所有者组织的转化和利用联系起来;(i)产业环境和项目安排之间的相互作用是否增强了产品或过程知识,以及(ii)高层和项目管理层对前馈学习的认识是否依赖于基于个人或制度的学习。这四种背景及其潜在条件提出了不同的知识工作相关问题,并对组织间合作及其他方面的实践提出了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
15.60%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Knowledge management is a term that has worked its way into the mainstream of both academic and business arenas since it was first coined in the 1980s. Interest has increased rapidly during the last decade and shows no signs of abating. The current state of the knowledge management field is that it encompasses four overlapping areas: •Managing knowledge (creating/acquiring, sharing, retaining, storing, using, updating, retiring) •Organisational learning •Intellectual capital •Knowledge economics Within (and across) these, knowledge management has to address issues relating to technology, people, culture and systems.
期刊最新文献
From authentic leadership to knowledge sharing and knowledge worker retention: mediating role of psychological empowerment Every coin has two sides: The application of artificial intelligence on employees’ unethical behaviours Sustainable leadership and knowledge ingredients - the recipe for sustainable competitive advantage: a mixed-method approach Relational social capital and tacit knowledge sharing: the mediation of P-O fit and POS Digital transformation through organisational unlearning: insights from practitioners’ voice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1