Bolstering Middle School Students’ Component Reading Skills: An Evaluation of the Lexia® PowerUp Literacy® Blended Learning Program

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH COMPUTERS IN THE SCHOOLS Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/07380569.2022.2037298
Lisa B. Hurwitz, P. Macaruso, Sarah Thang, Jamie Studwell
{"title":"Bolstering Middle School Students’ Component Reading Skills: An Evaluation of the Lexia® PowerUp Literacy® Blended Learning Program","authors":"Lisa B. Hurwitz, P. Macaruso, Sarah Thang, Jamie Studwell","doi":"10.1080/07380569.2022.2037298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Unfortunately, far too many American adolescents are unable to read proficiently. The science of reading suggests explicit instruction in both word identification and language processing skills should bolster reading proficiency, but most commercial reading interventions for secondary students focus exclusively on the latter skill area. This study explored the effectiveness of the Lexia PowerUp Literacy program (PowerUp), a digital reading intervention that provides explicit instruction in word identification, grammar, and comprehension. There were 122 sixth-grade students attending low-SES schools who participated in this year-long study. Students who used PowerUp showed significantly greater gains on an assessment of word identification, syntactic processing, and basic reading comprehension skills compared to students using an alternative program that offered opportunities to apply comprehension strategies in the absence of explicit and skills-based instruction. Results demonstrate the value of instruction extending beyond comprehension strategies to incorporate the full complement of skills needed for reading proficiency.","PeriodicalId":45769,"journal":{"name":"COMPUTERS IN THE SCHOOLS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMPUTERS IN THE SCHOOLS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2022.2037298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Unfortunately, far too many American adolescents are unable to read proficiently. The science of reading suggests explicit instruction in both word identification and language processing skills should bolster reading proficiency, but most commercial reading interventions for secondary students focus exclusively on the latter skill area. This study explored the effectiveness of the Lexia PowerUp Literacy program (PowerUp), a digital reading intervention that provides explicit instruction in word identification, grammar, and comprehension. There were 122 sixth-grade students attending low-SES schools who participated in this year-long study. Students who used PowerUp showed significantly greater gains on an assessment of word identification, syntactic processing, and basic reading comprehension skills compared to students using an alternative program that offered opportunities to apply comprehension strategies in the absence of explicit and skills-based instruction. Results demonstrate the value of instruction extending beyond comprehension strategies to incorporate the full complement of skills needed for reading proficiency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增强中学生的成分阅读技能:Lexia®PowerUp Literacy®混合学习计划的评估
不幸的是,太多的美国青少年不能熟练地阅读。阅读科学表明,在单词识别和语言处理技能方面的明确指导应该提高阅读能力,但大多数针对中学生的商业阅读干预只关注后者的技能领域。本研究探讨了Lexia PowerUp扫盲计划(PowerUp)的有效性,这是一种数字阅读干预,在单词识别、语法和理解方面提供明确的指导。有122名低社会经济地位学校的六年级学生参加了这项为期一年的研究。与使用另一种方案的学生相比,使用PowerUp的学生在单词识别、句法处理和基本阅读理解技能的评估方面表现出更大的进步,这种方案提供了在缺乏明确和基于技能的指导的情况下应用理解策略的机会。结果表明,教学的价值超越了理解策略,包括阅读能力所需的全部技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
COMPUTERS IN THE SCHOOLS
COMPUTERS IN THE SCHOOLS EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Under the editorship of D. LaMont Johnson, PhD, a nationally recognized leader in the field of educational computing, Computers in the Schools is supported by an editorial review board of prominent specialists in the school and educational setting. Material presented in this highly acclaimed journal goes beyond the “how we did it” magazine article or handbook by offering a rich source of serious discussion for educators, administrators, computer center directors, and special service providers in the school setting. Articles emphasize the practical aspect of any application, but also tie theory to practice, relate present accomplishments to past efforts and future trends, identify conclusions and their implications.
期刊最新文献
Automated Assessment of Students’ Interactions with Visual Representations: A Metacognitive Perspective on Comparing Fractions The Use of a Multimedia-Enabled, Serialized Worked-Example Artifact in an Online Environment for Secondary Education Motivation and Mathematical Performance Using Digital Game-Based Learning in Kindergarten Digital Security in Educational Contexts: Digital Competence and Challenges for Good Practice Technological and Sustainable Security: A Longitudinal Study on Teacher Training
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1