Five Years of India Rankings and its Impact on Performance Parameters of Engineering Educational Institutions in India Pt1 Teaching Learning and Resources Graduate Outcome Outreach and Inclusivity and Perception

IF 0.6 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology Pub Date : 2021-02-11 DOI:10.14429/DJLIT.41.1.16675
A. K. Nassa, Jagdish Arora, Priyanka Singh, J. Joorel, Hiteshkumar Solanki, Abhishek Kumar, Kruti Trivedi
{"title":"Five Years of India Rankings and its Impact on Performance Parameters of Engineering Educational Institutions in India Pt1 Teaching Learning and Resources Graduate Outcome Outreach and Inclusivity and Perception","authors":"A. K. Nassa, Jagdish Arora, Priyanka Singh, J. Joorel, Hiteshkumar Solanki, Abhishek Kumar, Kruti Trivedi","doi":"10.14429/DJLIT.41.1.16675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses data on five years of India rankings to assess its impact on performance parameters of institutions of higher education on four (out of five) broad categories of parameters, namely i) Teaching, Learning and Resources; ii) Graduation Outcome; iii) Outreach and Inclusivity; and iv) Perception. The analysis on data on four years of India Rankings, i.e. 2017 to 2020 on various performance parameters of HEIs in engineering discipline provides an interesting insight and reveals that participating institutions are making strenuous effort to improve their performance on various parameters or sub-parameters identified under NIRF. The analyses reflect that performance of remaining eligible institutions has improved on most of the ranking parameters in comparison to the100 topranked institutions over a period of four years of ranking, i.e. from 2017 to 2020.","PeriodicalId":44921,"journal":{"name":"DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology","volume":"41 1","pages":"20-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14429/DJLIT.41.1.16675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article analyses data on five years of India rankings to assess its impact on performance parameters of institutions of higher education on four (out of five) broad categories of parameters, namely i) Teaching, Learning and Resources; ii) Graduation Outcome; iii) Outreach and Inclusivity; and iv) Perception. The analysis on data on four years of India Rankings, i.e. 2017 to 2020 on various performance parameters of HEIs in engineering discipline provides an interesting insight and reveals that participating institutions are making strenuous effort to improve their performance on various parameters or sub-parameters identified under NIRF. The analyses reflect that performance of remaining eligible institutions has improved on most of the ranking parameters in comparison to the100 topranked institutions over a period of four years of ranking, i.e. from 2017 to 2020.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度五年排名及其对印度工程教育机构绩效参数的影响Pt1教学和资源毕业生成果拓展、包容性和感知
本文分析了印度五年排名的数据,以评估其对高等教育机构在四(五)大类参数上的绩效参数的影响,即i)教学,学习和资源;ii)毕业结果;iii)外联和包容性;iv)感知。对印度四年排名的数据(即2017年至2020年)对工程学科高等教育机构的各种绩效参数的分析提供了一个有趣的见解,并揭示了参与机构正在努力提高其在NIRF确定的各种参数或子参数上的表现。分析显示,与排名前100位的大学相比,在2017年至2020年的四年时间里,其余符合条件的大学在大多数排名参数上的表现都有所改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology
DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology publishes original research and review papers related to library science and IT applied to library activities, services, and products. Major subject fields covered include: Information systems, Knowledge management, Collection building & management, Information behaviour & retrieval, Librarianship/library management, Library & information services, Records management & preservation, etc.
期刊最新文献
Literature Survey and Analysis of Digital Humanities and Libraries in Recent Years Digital Humanities and Librarianship Text Mining of Twitter data for Mapping the Digital Humanities Research Trends Libraries and Digital Humanities Blended Learning vs E learning Determining the Best Mode of Education from the Perspective of the Learners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1