Assessing the Validity of the Trauma Inventory for Partners of Sex Addicts (TIPSA)

Heidi A Vogeler, Lane Fischer, Jennie L. Bingham, Kristina S. W. Hansen, M. Heath, A. Jackson, K. Skinner
{"title":"Assessing the Validity of the Trauma Inventory for Partners of Sex Addicts (TIPSA)","authors":"Heidi A Vogeler, Lane Fischer, Jennie L. Bingham, Kristina S. W. Hansen, M. Heath, A. Jackson, K. Skinner","doi":"10.1080/10720162.2020.1772158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of this study was to both provide additional evidence of the psychometric properties of the Trauma Inventory for Partners of Sex Addicts (TIPSA), and add empirical evidence for the application of betrayal trauma theory outside the context of complex and/or historical trauma. It was hypothesized that reliability coefficients for TIPSA would exceed 0.70; TIPSA and PTSD Checklist for DSM 5 (PCL-5) scores would be significantly positively correlated; TIPSA and Composite Codependency Scale (CCS) scores would not be significantly correlated; and neither Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) nor Benevolent Childhood Experiences (BCE) scores would be significantly correlated with, or have a significant effect on, TIPSA or PCL-5 scores. All reliability estimates were above 0.70, and correlation between TIPSA and PCL-5 produced a Pearson’s r of 0.851 (p = 5.541 E-55), which indicated a large effect size. Correlations with additional measures produced statistically significant, yet small to weak, effect sizes (CCS: r = 0.292; ACE: r = −0.173; BCE: r = 0.244). This evidence established convergent validity of TIPSA as a measure of trauma symptoms, divergent validity of TIPSA as a measure of codependency, and added empirical evidence for utilizing betrayal trauma theory in this context.","PeriodicalId":46423,"journal":{"name":"Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity-The Journal of Treatment and Prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10720162.2020.1772158","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity-The Journal of Treatment and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10720162.2020.1772158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this study was to both provide additional evidence of the psychometric properties of the Trauma Inventory for Partners of Sex Addicts (TIPSA), and add empirical evidence for the application of betrayal trauma theory outside the context of complex and/or historical trauma. It was hypothesized that reliability coefficients for TIPSA would exceed 0.70; TIPSA and PTSD Checklist for DSM 5 (PCL-5) scores would be significantly positively correlated; TIPSA and Composite Codependency Scale (CCS) scores would not be significantly correlated; and neither Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) nor Benevolent Childhood Experiences (BCE) scores would be significantly correlated with, or have a significant effect on, TIPSA or PCL-5 scores. All reliability estimates were above 0.70, and correlation between TIPSA and PCL-5 produced a Pearson’s r of 0.851 (p = 5.541 E-55), which indicated a large effect size. Correlations with additional measures produced statistically significant, yet small to weak, effect sizes (CCS: r = 0.292; ACE: r = −0.173; BCE: r = 0.244). This evidence established convergent validity of TIPSA as a measure of trauma symptoms, divergent validity of TIPSA as a measure of codependency, and added empirical evidence for utilizing betrayal trauma theory in this context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性成瘾者伴侣创伤量表效度评估
摘要本研究的目的是为性成瘾者伴侣创伤量表(TIPSA)的心理测量特性提供额外的证据,并为背叛创伤理论在复杂和/或历史创伤背景之外的应用提供经验证据。假设TIPSA的信度系数大于0.70;TIPSA与PTSD检查表DSM -5 (PCL-5)得分呈显著正相关;TIPSA与复合相互依赖量表(CCS)得分无显著相关;不良童年经历(ACE)和善意童年经历(BCE)得分与TIPSA或PCL-5得分均无显著相关或显著影响。所有的信度估计都在0.70以上,TIPSA与PCL-5之间的相关性产生了0.851的Pearson’s r (p = 5.541 E-55),表明存在较大的效应量。与其他测量方法的相关性产生了统计学上显著的效应量(CCS: r = 0.292;ACE: r =−0.173;BCE: r = 0.244)。这一证据建立了TIPSA的收敛效度作为创伤症状的衡量标准,TIPSA的发散效度作为相互依赖的衡量标准,并为在这一背景下利用背叛创伤理论增加了经验证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Now being understood and treated as a significant and widespread disorder, sexual addiction and compulsivity is an enormously complex problem that requires a multidisciplinary approach from psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers, family therapists, pastoral counselors, and law enforcement personnel. The first and only journal devoted to topics pertaining to this growing illness, Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity: The Journal of Treatment and Prevention is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for research and clinical practice. As the source for information in this expanding new field, this journal will give practicing clinicians useful and innovative strategies for intervention and treatment from the necessary multidisciplinary perspective.
期刊最新文献
Magnesium Supplementation with Special Reference to the Treatment of Alcoholism Change in Patterns of Tobacco Use during Lockdown due to COVID-19 Inpatient Addiction Medicine Consultation on Readmission Rates and Length of Stay A Case Study on the Impact of COVID -19 and Social Capital on the Delivery of Medication - Assisted Peer Support “Quit Masturbation, Change Failure”: The Process, Essence, and Reflection of the Identity Construction in the Abstinence Internet Organization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1