Exploring Student Perceptions of Self-Access Learning for Active Learning: A Case Study

IF 0.4 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal Pub Date : 2022-03-29 DOI:10.37237/130106
S. Warrington
{"title":"Exploring Student Perceptions of Self-Access Learning for Active Learning: A Case Study","authors":"S. Warrington","doi":"10.37237/130106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite much being written about self-access learning and active learning, both still remain definitionally evasive concepts. How both are conceptualised is very often dependent upon how they are interpreted within the context they are implemented in. Hence, making sense of the relationship between self-access learning and active learning poses a problem, especially considering the dearth of literature available. With these points in mind, this study explored unknown, unexpressed, and unascertained student understandings of self-access learning to gauge what these suggest for enacting active learning at one private Japanese university. This was done via a qualitative case study using an open-ended survey with 53 Japanese university students majoring in English. The findings showed that learners have a vague conception of self-access learning, seeing it as an environmentally-situated behaviour where they are free to do what they want despite often being unclear about how to use their time and having no clear learning plans. These behaviours, taken together, suggest active learning is unlikely to emerge without initial learner comprehension and acceptance of self-access learning. Moreover, it is likely these cannot be enacted if the right kind of administrative support is not provided.","PeriodicalId":43678,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37237/130106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Despite much being written about self-access learning and active learning, both still remain definitionally evasive concepts. How both are conceptualised is very often dependent upon how they are interpreted within the context they are implemented in. Hence, making sense of the relationship between self-access learning and active learning poses a problem, especially considering the dearth of literature available. With these points in mind, this study explored unknown, unexpressed, and unascertained student understandings of self-access learning to gauge what these suggest for enacting active learning at one private Japanese university. This was done via a qualitative case study using an open-ended survey with 53 Japanese university students majoring in English. The findings showed that learners have a vague conception of self-access learning, seeing it as an environmentally-situated behaviour where they are free to do what they want despite often being unclear about how to use their time and having no clear learning plans. These behaviours, taken together, suggest active learning is unlikely to emerge without initial learner comprehension and acceptance of self-access learning. Moreover, it is likely these cannot be enacted if the right kind of administrative support is not provided.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索学生自主学习对主动学习的认知:个案研究
尽管有很多关于自主学习和主动学习的文章,但两者在定义上仍然是回避的概念。两者的概念化方式往往取决于它们在实施环境中的解释方式。因此,理解自主学习和主动学习之间的关系是一个问题,尤其是考虑到缺乏可用的文献。考虑到这些点,本研究探索了未知、未表达和未确定的学生对自主学习的理解,以衡量这些理解对在一所日本私立大学实施积极学习的启示。这是通过一项定性案例研究完成的,该研究使用了一项开放式调查,对53名日本英语专业大学生进行了调查。研究结果表明,学习者对自主学习有一个模糊的概念,认为这是一种环境行为,他们可以自由地做自己想做的事情,尽管他们经常不清楚如何利用时间,也没有明确的学习计划。这些行为加在一起表明,如果没有学习者对自主学习的初步理解和接受,主动学习就不太可能出现。此外,如果不提供适当的行政支持,这些法案很可能无法颁布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal
Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Shadow Education in Hong Kong: An Insight From Local Private Tutors Book Review: Self-Regulated Learning and Second Language Writing, Springer 2022 An Overview of Web Assisted Learning and Teaching of Tamil (WALTT) at the Penn Language Center The Impact of the FlipGrid Application Within the Genre-Based Framework on Students’ Writing Skills and Self-Regulation of Learning Awareness Student Perceptions of Language Advising as a Complement to the Flipped Classroom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1