Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Response to Homeopathic Treatment of Psoriasis

Renu Mittal, D. Taneja, R. Manchanda, A. Khurana, A. Mukherjee, N. Kalra, R. Bala, Nidhi Mahajan, Gurudev Choubey, Ravi Kumar Sadarla, B. S. Rawat, Ashish P. Shivadikar, D. Gilla, A. Prusty, M. Sarangi, Padmalaya Rath, Madhumita Sadhukhan
{"title":"Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Response to Homeopathic Treatment of Psoriasis","authors":"Renu Mittal, D. Taneja, R. Manchanda, A. Khurana, A. Mukherjee, N. Kalra, R. Bala, Nidhi Mahajan, Gurudev Choubey, Ravi Kumar Sadarla, B. S. Rawat, Ashish P. Shivadikar, D. Gilla, A. Prusty, M. Sarangi, Padmalaya Rath, Madhumita Sadhukhan","doi":"10.21926/obm.icm.2203044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patients with psoriasis commonly opt for homeopathic treatment. However, no study has assessed the response to homeopathic treatment by using standardized disease-specific scales, and the findings are based on clinical assessments only. The objective of this study was to evaluate the response to the individualized homeopathic treatment of psoriasis with respect to changes in disease severity and quality of life based on Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and Psoriasis Disability Index (PDI) scales, respectively. A multicentric study was conducted using a pragmatic model. The study participants were regularly followed up for 1 year. Subsequently, participants completing the 1-year follow-up were included in a long-term assessment for further 2 years. Three monthly assessments were made by using PASI, PDI, and Visual Analog scales for patient and physician general assessment. Data were analyzed to identify treatment effects and variables affecting treatment. In total, 384 patients were enrolled, out of whom 254 participants completed 1 year of treatment. Of these, 84 participants continued treatment for an additional 12 months. A significant reduction was observed in the scores of PASI (10.96 ± 10.67 at baseline to 4.24 ± 5.10 at 12 months, p = 0.000), PDI (10.19 ± 9.11 to 3.91 ± 4.44, p = 0.000), and patient and physician global assessment scales. Regarding PASI response at 12 and 24 months, PASI 75–89 was reported in 66 and 14 participants, whereas PASI 90–100 was reported in 29 and 17 participants, respectively. Baseline severity of psoriasis considerably affected treatment response, whereas age, gender, and duration of psoriasis did not. Furthermore, the severity of psoriasis and quality of life improved considerably with regular homeopathic treatment.","PeriodicalId":74333,"journal":{"name":"OBM integrative and complimentary medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OBM integrative and complimentary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21926/obm.icm.2203044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Patients with psoriasis commonly opt for homeopathic treatment. However, no study has assessed the response to homeopathic treatment by using standardized disease-specific scales, and the findings are based on clinical assessments only. The objective of this study was to evaluate the response to the individualized homeopathic treatment of psoriasis with respect to changes in disease severity and quality of life based on Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and Psoriasis Disability Index (PDI) scales, respectively. A multicentric study was conducted using a pragmatic model. The study participants were regularly followed up for 1 year. Subsequently, participants completing the 1-year follow-up were included in a long-term assessment for further 2 years. Three monthly assessments were made by using PASI, PDI, and Visual Analog scales for patient and physician general assessment. Data were analyzed to identify treatment effects and variables affecting treatment. In total, 384 patients were enrolled, out of whom 254 participants completed 1 year of treatment. Of these, 84 participants continued treatment for an additional 12 months. A significant reduction was observed in the scores of PASI (10.96 ± 10.67 at baseline to 4.24 ± 5.10 at 12 months, p = 0.000), PDI (10.19 ± 9.11 to 3.91 ± 4.44, p = 0.000), and patient and physician global assessment scales. Regarding PASI response at 12 and 24 months, PASI 75–89 was reported in 66 and 14 participants, whereas PASI 90–100 was reported in 29 and 17 participants, respectively. Baseline severity of psoriasis considerably affected treatment response, whereas age, gender, and duration of psoriasis did not. Furthermore, the severity of psoriasis and quality of life improved considerably with regular homeopathic treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估顺势疗法治疗银屑病疗效的开放标签研究
牛皮癣患者通常选择顺势疗法治疗。然而,没有研究通过使用标准化的疾病特异性量表来评估顺势疗法治疗的反应,而且研究结果仅基于临床评估。本研究的目的是评估个体化顺势疗法治疗银屑病的反应,根据银屑病面积和严重程度指数(PASI)和银屑病残疾指数(PDI)量表分别评估疾病严重程度和生活质量的变化。采用语用模型进行多中心研究。研究参与者定期随访1年。随后,完成1年随访的参与者被纳入2年的长期评估。使用PASI、PDI和视觉模拟量表进行患者和医生一般评估,每月进行3次评估。分析数据以确定治疗效果和影响治疗的变量。共有384名患者入组,其中254名参与者完成了1年的治疗。其中,84名参与者继续治疗了12个月。PASI评分(基线时10.96±10.67至12个月时4.24±5.10,p = 0.000)、PDI评分(10.19±9.11至3.91±4.44,p = 0.000)、患者和医生整体评估量表评分均显著降低。关于12个月和24个月的PASI反应,66名和14名参与者报告了PASI 75-89,而29名和17名参与者分别报告了PASI 90-100。牛皮癣的基线严重程度显著影响治疗反应,而年龄、性别和牛皮癣持续时间则没有影响。此外,通过常规顺势疗法治疗,银屑病的严重程度和生活质量显著改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nature Connection, Mindfulness, and Wellbeing: A Network Analysis Possibilities of Predicting a Person's Substance Use Behaviour and Mental Health Through Social Media in a COVID-19 Crisis Context Sleep Quality, Sleep Efficiency, and Perceived Stress after Synchronous Virtual Mindfulness Meditation Sessions for Higher Education Students Report from the 11th International Symposium on Auriculotherapy Held in Copenhagen, 8-10 September 2023 - Auriculotherapy meets the field of Psychology Welcoming the “Metaverse” in Integrative and Complementary Medicine: Introductory Overview
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1