SELF-ASSESSMENT OF MOTIVATION FOR INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES LEARNING: RESULTS OF A PILOT STUDY AMONG SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS

K. Kráľová, Jirí Stípek, H. Vonková, Ondrej Papajoanu
{"title":"SELF-ASSESSMENT OF MOTIVATION FOR INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES LEARNING: RESULTS OF A PILOT STUDY AMONG SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS","authors":"K. Kráľová, Jirí Stípek, H. Vonková, Ondrej Papajoanu","doi":"10.18355/pg.2020.9.1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Self-assessment is often used in research, school, and employment. Respondents mark on a scale for example how good their skills and knowledge are or how they feel in a particular situation. One of the fields in which self-assessment can be applied is motivation. The aim of this contribution is (a) to find out the students´ intrinsic and extrinsic motivation to learn information and communication technologies (according to the type of attended school and gender), (b) to find out how these groups of students (according to the type of attended school and gender) use the scale when evaluating their motivation to learn ICT. The sample consists of students at four types of secondary schools (a humanities-oriented school offering a study programme Pedagogical Lyceum, a grammar school, a technical non-ICT school focused on mechanization, a technical school offering a study programme focused on ICT, N=166). The results show significant differences in ICT learning motivation amongst these groups of students. Our results indicate that students studying a study programme focused on ICT have a significantly higher level of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. When compared according to gender, boys show a higher level of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Individual respondents seem to use the scale in a significantly different way when assessing the motivation to learn ICT. However, within the groups we studied (gender, type of school), only slight differences in the use of the scale were found (students from ICT schools tend to use rather lower scale categories, they are stricter). In future research, it is necessary to analyze differences in scale usage among other groups (e.g. according to socio-economic status or peer groups). Furthermore, due to the high heterogeneity in the scale usage, we recommend applying the anchoring vignette method to increase the validity of the measurement.","PeriodicalId":34591,"journal":{"name":"Slavonic Pedagogical Studies Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Slavonic Pedagogical Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18355/pg.2020.9.1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Self-assessment is often used in research, school, and employment. Respondents mark on a scale for example how good their skills and knowledge are or how they feel in a particular situation. One of the fields in which self-assessment can be applied is motivation. The aim of this contribution is (a) to find out the students´ intrinsic and extrinsic motivation to learn information and communication technologies (according to the type of attended school and gender), (b) to find out how these groups of students (according to the type of attended school and gender) use the scale when evaluating their motivation to learn ICT. The sample consists of students at four types of secondary schools (a humanities-oriented school offering a study programme Pedagogical Lyceum, a grammar school, a technical non-ICT school focused on mechanization, a technical school offering a study programme focused on ICT, N=166). The results show significant differences in ICT learning motivation amongst these groups of students. Our results indicate that students studying a study programme focused on ICT have a significantly higher level of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. When compared according to gender, boys show a higher level of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Individual respondents seem to use the scale in a significantly different way when assessing the motivation to learn ICT. However, within the groups we studied (gender, type of school), only slight differences in the use of the scale were found (students from ICT schools tend to use rather lower scale categories, they are stricter). In future research, it is necessary to analyze differences in scale usage among other groups (e.g. according to socio-economic status or peer groups). Furthermore, due to the high heterogeneity in the scale usage, we recommend applying the anchoring vignette method to increase the validity of the measurement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信息和通信技术学习动机的自我评估:一项针对中学生的试点研究结果
自我评估经常用于研究、学校和就业。受访者用一个量表来标记他们的技能和知识有多好,或者他们在特定情况下的感受如何。自我评估可以应用的领域之一是动机。这项贡献的目的是(a)找出学生学习信息和通信技术的内在和外在动机(根据上学类型和性别),(b)找出这些学生群体(根据上学类别和性别)在评估他们学习信通技术的动机时如何使用量表。样本由四种类型的中学的学生组成(一所提供学习计划的人文学校——学力学园、一所文法学校、一所专注于机械化的非信息和通信技术技术技术学校和一所提供专注于信息和通信技术学习计划的技术学校,N=166)。研究结果显示,这些学生在信息通信技术学习动机方面存在显著差异。我们的研究结果表明,学习以信息通信技术为重点的学习计划的学生具有更高水平的内在和外在动机。当按性别进行比较时,男孩表现出更高水平的内在和外在动机。在评估学习信息和通信技术的动机时,个别受访者似乎以明显不同的方式使用该量表。然而,在我们研究的群体(性别、学校类型)中,只发现在使用量表方面有轻微差异(信息和通信技术学校的学生倾向于使用较低的量表类别,他们更严格)。在未来的研究中,有必要分析其他群体在规模使用方面的差异(例如,根据社会经济地位或同龄人)。此外,由于量表使用的高度异质性,我们建议应用锚定渐晕法来提高测量的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
CONTENT ANALYSIS OF TEXTBOOKS HISTORICAL EXCURSION THROUGH THE HISTORY OF FORESTRY EDUCATION IN THE TERRITORY OF THE CITY OF LIPTOVSKY HRADOK PRIMARY STUDENTS’ ALTERNATIVE IDEAS ABOUT WATER DIFFERENCES IN OBJECTIVELY AND SUBJECTIVELY MEASURED WEIGHT AND HEIGHT IN SLOVAK ADOLESCENTS USE OF SELECTED STRATEGIES IN LEARNING AND THEIR IMPACT ON LIFELONG LEARNING
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1