Trialing alternative listening assessment tasks: interactions between text authenticity, item focus and item presentation condition

IF 3.1 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching Pub Date : 2022-08-06 DOI:10.1080/17501229.2022.2109643
Stefan O’Grady
{"title":"Trialing alternative listening assessment tasks: interactions between text authenticity, item focus and item presentation condition","authors":"Stefan O’Grady","doi":"10.1080/17501229.2022.2109643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Purpose: The current study applies an innovative approach to the assessment of second language listening comprehension skills. This is an important focus in need of innovation because scores generated through language assessment tasks should reflect variation in the target skill and the literature broadly suggests that conventional methods of assessing listening may fall short of achieving this principle (Field [2019]. Rethinking the Second Language Listening Test from Theory to Practice. Equinox). Design: The study investigated interactions between different methods of presenting listening comprehension questions, the focus of the comprehension questions and the relative authenticity of the sound file in an English-medium university entrance listening test. In a balanced design, 61 participants completed a listening test featuring both scripted and unscripted sound files by answering explicit and implicit information comprehension questions under five counterbalanced question preview and presentation conditions. Test scores were analysed using ANOVA and examined for interactions. Findings: The results revealed interesting relationships between text authenticity and item focus whereby item responses were most frequently correct overall on the explicit items on scripted tasks. However, the reverse was observed on the implicit items, which were more frequently correct on the unscripted tasks. Value: The research findings have important implications for construct definition and highlight possible directions for the development of pedagogical listening tasks and assessments for English-medium academic study.","PeriodicalId":45930,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching","volume":"17 1","pages":"664 - 677"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2022.2109643","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose: The current study applies an innovative approach to the assessment of second language listening comprehension skills. This is an important focus in need of innovation because scores generated through language assessment tasks should reflect variation in the target skill and the literature broadly suggests that conventional methods of assessing listening may fall short of achieving this principle (Field [2019]. Rethinking the Second Language Listening Test from Theory to Practice. Equinox). Design: The study investigated interactions between different methods of presenting listening comprehension questions, the focus of the comprehension questions and the relative authenticity of the sound file in an English-medium university entrance listening test. In a balanced design, 61 participants completed a listening test featuring both scripted and unscripted sound files by answering explicit and implicit information comprehension questions under five counterbalanced question preview and presentation conditions. Test scores were analysed using ANOVA and examined for interactions. Findings: The results revealed interesting relationships between text authenticity and item focus whereby item responses were most frequently correct overall on the explicit items on scripted tasks. However, the reverse was observed on the implicit items, which were more frequently correct on the unscripted tasks. Value: The research findings have important implications for construct definition and highlight possible directions for the development of pedagogical listening tasks and assessments for English-medium academic study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
试验替代性听力评估任务:文本真实性、项目焦点和项目呈现条件之间的相互作用
摘要目的:本研究采用一种创新的方法来评估第二语言听力理解能力。这是一个需要创新的重要焦点,因为通过语言评估任务产生的分数应该反映目标技能的变化,而文献普遍表明,评估听力的传统方法可能无法实现这一原则(Field[2019])。从理论到实践对第二语言听力测试的再思考。Equinox)。设计:本研究考察了以英语为媒介的大学入学听力考试中不同的听力提问方式、理解题的焦点和声音文件的相对真实性之间的相互作用。在平衡设计中,61名参与者在5个平衡问题预览和呈现条件下,通过回答显性和隐性信息理解问题完成了有脚本和无脚本声音文件的听力测试。使用方差分析分析测试成绩,并检查相互作用。研究发现:结果揭示了文本真实性和项目焦点之间有趣的关系,即在脚本任务的显性项目上,项目回答通常是正确的。然而,在隐性任务上观察到的情况正好相反,在非脚本任务上,它们往往是正确的。价值:研究结果对构建定义具有重要意义,并为英语媒体学术研究的教学听力任务和评估的发展指明了可能的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching is an international refereed journal devoted to innovative approaches to methodologies and pedagogies in language learning and teaching. It publishes research articles, review articles and book/materials reviews. It draws on a range of disciplines that share a focus on exploring new approaches to language learning and teaching from a learner-centred perspective. It will appeal to anyone interested in the development of, research into or practical application of new methodologies in language teaching and learning.
期刊最新文献
Local research and global perspectives in English language teaching Writing creative stories with AI: learning designs for secondary school students Professional intercultural communicative competence in action Gamified-flipped English classes and L2 learners’ achievement and perceptions Game on: enhancing argumentative writing with digital gamification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1