The Effect of Grammatical Understanding on the Ability of Writing Thesis Students

Rati Riana, S. Susanto
{"title":"The Effect of Grammatical Understanding on the Ability of Writing Thesis Students","authors":"Rati Riana, S. Susanto","doi":"10.26714/lensa.12.1.2022.46-65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to decrypt and analyze whether grammatical understanding affects the writing ability of Semarang University’s students thesis and how it affects. This type of research is quantitative research with the type of research is inference used to test hypotheses to determine the influence of grammatical understanding on the ability to write thesis. The sample of this study was students who were preparing the thesis of four courses that were taken randomly. Sampling techniques using probability sampling. Data collection techniques are carried out by direct observation using structured questionnaires. Quantitative data of questionnaire results tested with F-test. While qualitative data from thesis text analysis is analyzed descriptively. The result is that between right and wrong in 10 criteria of grammatically, that is 57.43% true and 42.57% wrong. Based on the F-test results obtained results that the regression coefficient of 0.672 with a significance value of 0.000 < 0.05. This means that the effectiveness of sentences has a positive and significant influence on grammatical understanding in writing thesis. This influence supports the analysis of thesis documents with the findings of 636 sentences from the thesis author. Of the 636 sentences found 429 sentences were grammatical and 207 sentences were not grammatical. The ungrammatically of the sentence is caused by several things, namely sentences without a subject, without predicates, without predicates and predicates, double-substitutes, double predicates, objects preceded by forejectives, substitutes and double-predicates, repeating subjects, without objects, not using the conjunction ”bahwa”, and inaccuracies in the use of hyphens ”then”.","PeriodicalId":31773,"journal":{"name":"Lensa Kajian Kebahasaan Kesusastraan dan Budaya","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lensa Kajian Kebahasaan Kesusastraan dan Budaya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26714/lensa.12.1.2022.46-65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to decrypt and analyze whether grammatical understanding affects the writing ability of Semarang University’s students thesis and how it affects. This type of research is quantitative research with the type of research is inference used to test hypotheses to determine the influence of grammatical understanding on the ability to write thesis. The sample of this study was students who were preparing the thesis of four courses that were taken randomly. Sampling techniques using probability sampling. Data collection techniques are carried out by direct observation using structured questionnaires. Quantitative data of questionnaire results tested with F-test. While qualitative data from thesis text analysis is analyzed descriptively. The result is that between right and wrong in 10 criteria of grammatically, that is 57.43% true and 42.57% wrong. Based on the F-test results obtained results that the regression coefficient of 0.672 with a significance value of 0.000 < 0.05. This means that the effectiveness of sentences has a positive and significant influence on grammatical understanding in writing thesis. This influence supports the analysis of thesis documents with the findings of 636 sentences from the thesis author. Of the 636 sentences found 429 sentences were grammatical and 207 sentences were not grammatical. The ungrammatically of the sentence is caused by several things, namely sentences without a subject, without predicates, without predicates and predicates, double-substitutes, double predicates, objects preceded by forejectives, substitutes and double-predicates, repeating subjects, without objects, not using the conjunction ”bahwa”, and inaccuracies in the use of hyphens ”then”.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语法理解对学生论文写作能力的影响
本研究的目的是解密和分析语法理解是否影响三宝垄大学学生论文的写作能力,以及它是如何影响的。这类研究是定量研究,而这类研究则是用来检验假设的推理,以确定语法理解对论文写作能力的影响。本研究的样本是正在准备四门课程论文的学生,这四门课程是随机抽取的。使用概率抽样的抽样技术。数据收集技术是通过使用结构化问卷的直接观察来进行的。F检验问卷结果的定量数据。同时对论文文本分析的定性数据进行描述性分析。结果表明,在语法的10个标准中,对错之间分别为57.43%和42.57%。基于F检验结果得到的结果表明,回归系数为0.672,显著值为0.000<0.05。这意味着句子的有效性对论文中的语法理解有着积极而重要的影响。这种影响支持了论文作者对636句论文的分析。在636个句子中,429个句子符合语法,207个句子不符合语法。句子的语法不规则是由几件事引起的,即没有主语的句子,没有谓语,没有谓语和谓语,双替代物,双谓语,宾语前面有主词,替代物和双谓语,重复主语,没有宾语,不使用连词“bahwa”,以及连字符“then”使用不准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Depression Symptoms on The Dialogues of Laney Brooks in I Smile Back Movie SONG TRANSLATION OF SPEECHLESS BY NAOMI SCOTT: METAPHOR AND UNTRANSLATABILITY Politeness Levels of Thanking and Apologizing: A Corpus Linguistic Investigation Across Generations in the Movies Go Green Culture in Selametan Katerbi’en Tradition of Madura Conceptualization of Metaphor at the Discourse of the Bali G20 Summit in Online Mass Media: Cognitive Semantic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1