On the relationship between procedural justice and organizational citizenship behavior: a test of mediation and moderation effects

IF 1.6 Q2 Business, Management and Accounting Evidence-based HRM-A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship Pub Date : 2022-05-24 DOI:10.1108/ebhrm-05-2021-0107
Phan Dinh Nguyen, Lobel Trong Thuy Tran
{"title":"On the relationship between procedural justice and organizational citizenship behavior: a test of mediation and moderation effects","authors":"Phan Dinh Nguyen, Lobel Trong Thuy Tran","doi":"10.1108/ebhrm-05-2021-0107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study conceptualizes job engagement and satisfaction as a crucial mediating mechanism in the relationship between procedural justice and citizenship behavior at individual level (OCB) under the boundary conditions of perceived supervisor support (PSS) and rewards and recognition (RR).Design/methodology/approachThe survey data were obtained from two periods of time. To reduce the potential bias, the authors approached respondents from different business units and measured RR and OCB from different points of time. The authors assessed the path significance at 95% bias-corrected confidence interval or more by the PLS algorithm and bootstrapping statistics.FindingsUsing an import-export company data, this study substantiates a positive effect of the proposed mediational mechanism of job engagement and satisfaction. In addition, the authors substantiate moderating roles of PSS and RR in the relationships between procedural justice and job satisfaction and, between job engagement and OCB, respectively.Originality/valueThis study is an important extension in enhancing the procedural justice and OCB relationship. The results do not only underscore the contributions of job engagement and satisfaction as vital mediators to the assumed relationship but also lend support to the inclusion of the moderating effects of PSS and RR.","PeriodicalId":51902,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based HRM-A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based HRM-A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ebhrm-05-2021-0107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

PurposeThis study conceptualizes job engagement and satisfaction as a crucial mediating mechanism in the relationship between procedural justice and citizenship behavior at individual level (OCB) under the boundary conditions of perceived supervisor support (PSS) and rewards and recognition (RR).Design/methodology/approachThe survey data were obtained from two periods of time. To reduce the potential bias, the authors approached respondents from different business units and measured RR and OCB from different points of time. The authors assessed the path significance at 95% bias-corrected confidence interval or more by the PLS algorithm and bootstrapping statistics.FindingsUsing an import-export company data, this study substantiates a positive effect of the proposed mediational mechanism of job engagement and satisfaction. In addition, the authors substantiate moderating roles of PSS and RR in the relationships between procedural justice and job satisfaction and, between job engagement and OCB, respectively.Originality/valueThis study is an important extension in enhancing the procedural justice and OCB relationship. The results do not only underscore the contributions of job engagement and satisfaction as vital mediators to the assumed relationship but also lend support to the inclusion of the moderating effects of PSS and RR.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
程序正义与组织公民行为的关系——中介和调节效应检验
目的本研究将工作参与度和满意度概念化为在感知上司支持(PSS)和奖励与认可(RR)的边界条件下,程序公正与个人公民行为(OCB)之间关系的一个重要中介机制。为了减少潜在的偏见,作者接触了来自不同业务部门的受访者,并从不同的时间点测量了RR和OCB。作者通过PLS算法和自举统计评估了95%偏差校正置信区间或更大置信区间下的路径显著性。结果利用一家进出口公司的数据,本研究证实了所提出的工作敬业度和满意度中介机制的积极作用。此外,作者还证实了PSS和RR分别在程序公正与工作满意度之间以及工作敬业度与OCB之间的关系中起调节作用。独创性/价值本研究是加强程序正义与OCB关系的重要延伸。研究结果不仅强调了工作参与度和满意度作为假设关系的重要中介的贡献,而且支持纳入PSS和RR的调节作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Do employees involved in career accidents experience greater work engagement? The moderating role of job resources Healthy employees are assets: a structural model based on individual and organizational characteristics for hotel employee well-being The moderating effects of positive thinking on the relationship between job stress and turnover intention Extending training predictors link with training transfer through mediation of motivation Impacts of knowledge-based HRM, knowledge sharing and perceived organizational supports on innovation performance: a moderated-mediation analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1