Self-rated health implications of noise for open-plan office workers: An overview of the literature

IF 1.4 Q3 ACOUSTICS BUILDING ACOUSTICS Pub Date : 2023-02-15 DOI:10.1177/1351010X231152841
Sofia Felipe Contin de Oliveira, F. Aletta, Jian Kang
{"title":"Self-rated health implications of noise for open-plan office workers: An overview of the literature","authors":"Sofia Felipe Contin de Oliveira, F. Aletta, Jian Kang","doi":"10.1177/1351010X231152841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In open-plan offices (OPO), workspaces without ground-to-ceiling dividers, noise is one of the most complained about aspects, causing physical and psychological impacts. With the increasing interest for a human-centric design, notably after the publication of ISO 22955, this review aims to identify the main noise sources in this office layout and the employees’ perception of related health effects, evaluating the interventions proposed to overcome their impacts. Following the PRISMA guidelines, a review was conducted using the Scopus and PubMed databases, considering subjective questionnaires distributed in offices, which could include physical workspace assessment. It excluded studies limited to: (a) laboratory experiments; (b) isolated cognitive tests; (c) office layouts other than OPO; (d) systematic reviews; and (e) mathematical models. Sixty studies were identified and the screening process resulted in 11 selected for inclusion, which indicated irrelevant speech, chatting, and telephone ringing as the main noise sources causing productivity loss, stress, and low comfort rates due to distraction and lack of privacy. To overcome these impacts, researchers suggested the use of sound-absorbing surfaces, separated zones for different tasks and headphones, although their effectiveness relies on human behaviour and economic feasibility. Thus, the evidence indicates that noise is a recurrent issue in OPOs, it demonstrates the importance of appropriate acoustic performance of the workspace and the necessity of new studies regarding OPO workers’ perception of noise and their health, particularly after the COVID-19 new safety guidelines.","PeriodicalId":51841,"journal":{"name":"BUILDING ACOUSTICS","volume":"30 1","pages":"105 - 125"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BUILDING ACOUSTICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1351010X231152841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In open-plan offices (OPO), workspaces without ground-to-ceiling dividers, noise is one of the most complained about aspects, causing physical and psychological impacts. With the increasing interest for a human-centric design, notably after the publication of ISO 22955, this review aims to identify the main noise sources in this office layout and the employees’ perception of related health effects, evaluating the interventions proposed to overcome their impacts. Following the PRISMA guidelines, a review was conducted using the Scopus and PubMed databases, considering subjective questionnaires distributed in offices, which could include physical workspace assessment. It excluded studies limited to: (a) laboratory experiments; (b) isolated cognitive tests; (c) office layouts other than OPO; (d) systematic reviews; and (e) mathematical models. Sixty studies were identified and the screening process resulted in 11 selected for inclusion, which indicated irrelevant speech, chatting, and telephone ringing as the main noise sources causing productivity loss, stress, and low comfort rates due to distraction and lack of privacy. To overcome these impacts, researchers suggested the use of sound-absorbing surfaces, separated zones for different tasks and headphones, although their effectiveness relies on human behaviour and economic feasibility. Thus, the evidence indicates that noise is a recurrent issue in OPOs, it demonstrates the importance of appropriate acoustic performance of the workspace and the necessity of new studies regarding OPO workers’ perception of noise and their health, particularly after the COVID-19 new safety guidelines.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自评噪音对开放式办公室工作人员的健康影响:文献综述
在开放式办公室(OPO)中,没有从地到天花板的隔板的工作空间,噪音是最受抱怨的方面之一,会对身体和心理造成影响。随着人们对以人为本的设计越来越感兴趣,特别是在ISO 22955发布之后,本综述旨在确定该办公室布局中的主要噪声源以及员工对相关健康影响的感知,并评估为克服其影响而提出的干预措施。按照PRISMA的指导方针,使用Scopus和PubMed数据库进行了审查,考虑到在办公室分发的主观问卷,其中可能包括物理工作空间评估。它排除了局限于:(a)实验室实验的研究;(b)孤立的认知测试;(c) OPO以外的办公室布局;(d)系统审查;(e)数学模型。60项研究被确定,筛选过程中有11项被选中纳入,这表明不相关的语音,聊天和电话铃声是主要的噪声源,导致生产力下降,压力,以及由于分心和缺乏隐私而导致的低舒适度。为了克服这些影响,研究人员建议使用吸声表面,为不同的任务分隔区域和耳机,尽管它们的有效性取决于人类行为和经济可行性。因此,有证据表明,噪声是OPO中一个反复出现的问题,它表明了工作空间适当声学性能的重要性,以及对OPO工人对噪声及其健康的感知进行新研究的必要性,特别是在2019冠状病毒病新安全指南之后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BUILDING ACOUSTICS
BUILDING ACOUSTICS ACOUSTICS-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Enhancing response estimation and system identification in structural health monitoring through data-driven approaches Effect of loudspeaker position and model on cognitive load, quality, clarity, and sentence recognition performance Determination of the sound absorption coefficient of ETFE cushions in-situ using the genetic material optimizer in Odeon® Methodological approaches and main factors considered in school soundscape studies: A scoping review The relationship between the in situ flanking sound reduction index and the laboratory measured flanking normalized level difference
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1