”Determining correlation between severity of primary dysmenorrhea and resting metabolic rate in college-going girls of 18–25 years of age:” An observational study

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of the Scientific Society Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.4103/jss.jss_160_22
R. Rathi, Arati V Mahishale
{"title":"”Determining correlation between severity of primary dysmenorrhea and resting metabolic rate in college-going girls of 18–25 years of age:” An observational study","authors":"R. Rathi, Arati V Mahishale","doi":"10.4103/jss.jss_160_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Dysmenorrhea is painful cramps originating from the uterus that occurs during menstruation. There is a dearth in the literature assessing a possible association between primary dysmenorrhea and resting metabolic rate (RMR). Aims and Objectives: To find the the correlation resting metabolic rate and primary dysmenorrhea in college going girls between 18 – 25 years using numeric pain rating scale and Harris benedict equation Material and Method: This study included a total of 206 college-going girls between 18 and 25 years of age with primary dysmenorrhea based on the selection criteria. They were administered with the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), which divided them into mild, moderate, and severe pain and demographic data including age (years), height (cm), and weight (kg) which was employed into Harris–Benedict Equation to calculate their respective RMR and then it was correlated with the severity of dysmenorrhea. Results: The overall comparison of groups, based on the NPRS values, with RMR scores, showed a statistically significant difference (F = 3.0951, P = 0.0280). While analyzing pair-wise comparison within each group of pain scores for their metabolic rate values, the RMR of females with no pain that is, NPRS score - 0, showed a significantly higher metabolic rate than the ones with mild pain (P = 0.0027), moderate pain (P = 0.0123), as well as the ones with severe pain (P = 0.0036). Spearman rank correlation test revealed no association between different groups of NPRS scores and RMR values (t = −0.0926, P = 0.9263). Conclusion: The study concluded that there is no correlation between the severity of primary dysmenorrhea and RMR in girls between 18 and 25 years. However, girls who do not experience dysmenorrhea showed higher RMR than the girls with primary dysmenorrhea.","PeriodicalId":55681,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Scientific Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Scientific Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jss.jss_160_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dysmenorrhea is painful cramps originating from the uterus that occurs during menstruation. There is a dearth in the literature assessing a possible association between primary dysmenorrhea and resting metabolic rate (RMR). Aims and Objectives: To find the the correlation resting metabolic rate and primary dysmenorrhea in college going girls between 18 – 25 years using numeric pain rating scale and Harris benedict equation Material and Method: This study included a total of 206 college-going girls between 18 and 25 years of age with primary dysmenorrhea based on the selection criteria. They were administered with the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), which divided them into mild, moderate, and severe pain and demographic data including age (years), height (cm), and weight (kg) which was employed into Harris–Benedict Equation to calculate their respective RMR and then it was correlated with the severity of dysmenorrhea. Results: The overall comparison of groups, based on the NPRS values, with RMR scores, showed a statistically significant difference (F = 3.0951, P = 0.0280). While analyzing pair-wise comparison within each group of pain scores for their metabolic rate values, the RMR of females with no pain that is, NPRS score - 0, showed a significantly higher metabolic rate than the ones with mild pain (P = 0.0027), moderate pain (P = 0.0123), as well as the ones with severe pain (P = 0.0036). Spearman rank correlation test revealed no association between different groups of NPRS scores and RMR values (t = −0.0926, P = 0.9263). Conclusion: The study concluded that there is no correlation between the severity of primary dysmenorrhea and RMR in girls between 18 and 25 years. However, girls who do not experience dysmenorrhea showed higher RMR than the girls with primary dysmenorrhea.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“确定18-25岁大学女生原发性痛经严重程度与静息代谢率之间的相关性:一项观察性研究。
背景:痛经是指在月经期间发生的由子宫引起的疼痛性痉挛。文献中很少评估原发性痛经与静息代谢率(RMR)之间的可能联系。目的和目的:使用数字疼痛评定量表和Harris benedict方程,探讨18-25岁在校女生静息代谢率与原发性痛经的相关性材料和方法:本研究基于选择标准,共纳入206名18-25岁原发性闭经的在校女生。他们接受了数字疼痛评定量表(NPRS),该量表将他们分为轻度、中度和重度疼痛,并将人口统计学数据(包括年龄(年)、身高(cm)和体重(kg))纳入Harris–Benedict方程,计算他们各自的RMR,然后将其与痛经的严重程度相关联。结果:基于NPRS值的各组与RMR评分的总体比较显示出统计学上的显著差异(F=3.0951,P=0.0280)。在分析各组疼痛评分代谢率值的配对比较时,没有疼痛的女性的RMR即NPRS评分-0,表现出明显高于轻度疼痛(P=0.0027)、中度疼痛(P=0.0123)和轻度疼痛(P=0.0128)的代谢率,Spearman秩相关检验显示,不同组的NPRS评分与RMR值之间没有相关性(t=-0.0926,P=0.9263)。结论:研究得出结论,18-25岁女孩原发性痛经的严重程度与RMR之间没有相关性。然而,没有痛经的女孩比原发性痛经的女孩表现出更高的RMR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Scientific Society
Journal of the Scientific Society MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
19
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Paradigm Shift in Prosthodontics: Analog to Digital Proportion of Urinary Tract Infection in Children between 6 Months to 5 Years of Age Presenting with Fever Renal Manifestation of Mixed Connective Tissue Disease The Study of COVID-19 Infection in Health-Care Workers Post-COVID Vaccination Physical Fitness in Children with Thalassemia Major Measured With 6-min Walk Test
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1