The Fiscal Burden of Wildfires: State Expenditures and Funding Mechanisms for Wildfire Suppression in the Western U.S. and Implications for Federal Policy

Q2 Social Sciences State and Local Government Review Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1177/0160323X211061353
Chelsea Pennick McIver, P. Cook, Dennis R Becker
{"title":"The Fiscal Burden of Wildfires: State Expenditures and Funding Mechanisms for Wildfire Suppression in the Western U.S. and Implications for Federal Policy","authors":"Chelsea Pennick McIver, P. Cook, Dennis R Becker","doi":"10.1177/0160323X211061353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The number and size of wildfires in the western United States have increased dramatically in the last 30 years. The rising cost of wildfire suppression has become a significant concern for all levels of government, although most attention has been focused on the federal level. Much less is known about the financial impact of expenditures on states, which retain responsibility for suppression on over 480 million acres of state and private forests. This study collected data on state expenditures for wildfire suppression in the western United States from 2005 to 2015 to examine fiscal burdens and compare funding mechanisms used to cover those costs. Our analysis finds that western states expended $11.9 billion on wildfire suppression over the 11-year period and used own-source funds to cover 88 percent of these costs. States displayed a variety of mechanisms for covering their cost obligations with tradeoffs that may affect non-wildfire policy priorities.","PeriodicalId":52260,"journal":{"name":"State and Local Government Review","volume":"53 1","pages":"337 - 351"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"State and Local Government Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X211061353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The number and size of wildfires in the western United States have increased dramatically in the last 30 years. The rising cost of wildfire suppression has become a significant concern for all levels of government, although most attention has been focused on the federal level. Much less is known about the financial impact of expenditures on states, which retain responsibility for suppression on over 480 million acres of state and private forests. This study collected data on state expenditures for wildfire suppression in the western United States from 2005 to 2015 to examine fiscal burdens and compare funding mechanisms used to cover those costs. Our analysis finds that western states expended $11.9 billion on wildfire suppression over the 11-year period and used own-source funds to cover 88 percent of these costs. States displayed a variety of mechanisms for covering their cost obligations with tradeoffs that may affect non-wildfire policy priorities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
野火的财政负担:美国西部扑灭野火的州支出和资金机制及其对联邦政策的影响
在过去的30年里,美国西部野火的数量和规模急剧增加。尽管大部分注意力集中在联邦一级,但不断上升的灭火成本已成为各级政府关注的一个重大问题。人们对支出对各州的财政影响知之甚少,各州仍有责任对超过4.8亿英亩的国有和私人森林进行砍伐。本研究收集了2005年至2015年美国西部各州扑灭野火支出的数据,以检查财政负担,并比较用于支付这些费用的筹资机制。我们的分析发现,西部各州在11年的时间里花费了119亿美元用于扑灭野火,其中88%的费用由自有资金支付。各国展示了各种机制,通过可能影响非野火政策优先事项的权衡来履行其成本义务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
State and Local Government Review
State and Local Government Review Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
State Partisan Dominance and the Distribution of TANF Funds, 2000–2018 Policy Learning and the Diffusion of Autonomous Vehicle Policy in the American States Political Drivers of State Fiscal Cyclicality She Said Yes! An Exploration of Confidence Among Women Who Run for Political Office Do Local Fiscal Decisions Impact Economic Growth: The Case of Wisconsin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1