War-Affected South Sudanese in Settings of Preflight, Flight, and Resettlement: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Trauma-Associated Mental Disorders.

IF 1.3 Q2 SOCIAL WORK Global Social Welfare Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-18 DOI:10.1007/s40609-022-00227-w
Nhial T Tutlam, Jen Jen Chang, William Byansi, Louise H Flick, Fred M Ssewamala, Theresa S Betancourt
{"title":"War-Affected South Sudanese in Settings of Preflight, Flight, and Resettlement: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Trauma-Associated Mental Disorders.","authors":"Nhial T Tutlam, Jen Jen Chang, William Byansi, Louise H Flick, Fred M Ssewamala, Theresa S Betancourt","doi":"10.1007/s40609-022-00227-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>South Sudanese have experienced prolonged exposure to conflict and displacement regionally and globally, with studies in different settings yielding vastly inconsistent rates of trauma-associated mental disorders. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize the methodological approach and quality, trauma exposure, risk and protective factors, and aggregate available data on the prevalence of trauma-associated mental disorders among South Sudanese in different settings to gain better understanding of the impact of war trauma in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Guided by the new (2020) Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all studies published from 1981 to 2021. The main inclusion criteria were as follows: studies published in English, present prevalence rates on anxiety, depression, and/or posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and number of traumatic events, and have a sample size of 30 or more. We calculated pooled prevalence, 95% confidence intervals, and <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> statistic to test heterogeneity between studies in MedCalc statistical software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We reviewed a total of nine reports from eight unique studies with total of 6138 participants. All studies were cross-sectional in design with six designated as low quality and two as moderate quality. South Sudanese experienced on average nine war-related traumatic events. Consequently, the overall pooled rates of trauma-associated mental disorders are high: anxiety = 25.2% (95% CI: 14.0, 38.5); depression = 24.2% (8.4, 45.0); and PTSD = 34.0% (29.0, 39.1). Overall prevalence of PTSD was 40% in both preflight and flight settings; however, aggregate rate of just 14% was recorded in resettlement settings. Risk factors include female gender, advanced age, severity, and recency of traumatic events, and cultural adjustment difficulties. Protective factors include urban residency, social support, religion, higher annual household income, household possessions, and history of migration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis reveals that prolonged exposure to war trauma has negatively impacted the psychological wellbeing of South Sudanese in refugee camps and those still in their homeland. However, the prevalence appears to be lower among those resettled in developed countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":51927,"journal":{"name":"Global Social Welfare","volume":" ","pages":"193-210"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11588307/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Social Welfare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40609-022-00227-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: South Sudanese have experienced prolonged exposure to conflict and displacement regionally and globally, with studies in different settings yielding vastly inconsistent rates of trauma-associated mental disorders. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize the methodological approach and quality, trauma exposure, risk and protective factors, and aggregate available data on the prevalence of trauma-associated mental disorders among South Sudanese in different settings to gain better understanding of the impact of war trauma in this population.

Methods: Guided by the new (2020) Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all studies published from 1981 to 2021. The main inclusion criteria were as follows: studies published in English, present prevalence rates on anxiety, depression, and/or posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and number of traumatic events, and have a sample size of 30 or more. We calculated pooled prevalence, 95% confidence intervals, and I 2 statistic to test heterogeneity between studies in MedCalc statistical software.

Results: We reviewed a total of nine reports from eight unique studies with total of 6138 participants. All studies were cross-sectional in design with six designated as low quality and two as moderate quality. South Sudanese experienced on average nine war-related traumatic events. Consequently, the overall pooled rates of trauma-associated mental disorders are high: anxiety = 25.2% (95% CI: 14.0, 38.5); depression = 24.2% (8.4, 45.0); and PTSD = 34.0% (29.0, 39.1). Overall prevalence of PTSD was 40% in both preflight and flight settings; however, aggregate rate of just 14% was recorded in resettlement settings. Risk factors include female gender, advanced age, severity, and recency of traumatic events, and cultural adjustment difficulties. Protective factors include urban residency, social support, religion, higher annual household income, household possessions, and history of migration.

Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis reveals that prolonged exposure to war trauma has negatively impacted the psychological wellbeing of South Sudanese in refugee camps and those still in their homeland. However, the prevalence appears to be lower among those resettled in developed countries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
受战争影响的南苏丹人在飞行前、飞行和重新安置环境中:创伤相关精神障碍的系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:南苏丹人在地区和全球范围内经历了长期的冲突和流离失所,不同环境下的研究得出的创伤相关精神障碍发病率大相径庭。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在综合研究方法和质量、创伤暴露、风险和保护因素,并汇总不同环境下南苏丹人创伤相关精神障碍患病率的现有数据,以更好地了解战争创伤对这一人群的影响:在新的(2020 年)系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明的指导下,我们对 1981 年至 2021 年发表的所有研究进行了系统综述和荟萃分析。主要纳入标准如下:以英语发表的研究,提出焦虑、抑郁和/或创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的患病率,以及创伤事件的数量,样本量达到或超过 30 个。我们在 MedCalc 统计软件中计算了汇总患病率、95% 置信区间和 I 2 统计量,以检验研究之间的异质性:我们共审查了来自 8 项独特研究的 9 份报告,共有 6138 名参与者。所有研究均为横断面设计,其中六项被定为低质量研究,两项被定为中等质量研究。南苏丹人平均经历了九次与战争有关的创伤事件。因此,与创伤相关的精神障碍的总体患病率较高:焦虑 = 25.2% (95% CI: 14.0, 38.5);抑郁 = 24.2% (8.4, 45.0);创伤后应激障碍 = 34.0% (29.0, 39.1)。在飞行前和飞行环境中,创伤后应激障碍的总体发病率为 40%;但在重新安置环境中,创伤后应激障碍的总体发病率仅为 14%。风险因素包括女性性别、高龄、创伤事件的严重性和反复性以及文化适应困难。保护因素包括城市居民、社会支持、宗教、较高的家庭年收入、家庭财产和移民史:本系统综述和荟萃分析表明,长期遭受战争创伤对难民营中的南苏丹人和仍在家乡的南苏丹人的心理健康产生了负面影响。不过,在发达国家重新定居的南苏丹人中,这种情况似乎较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Social Welfare
Global Social Welfare SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: This journal brings together research that informs the fields of global social work, social development, and social welfare policy and practice. It serves as an outlet for manuscripts and brief reports of interdisciplinary applied research which advance knowledge about global threats to the well-being of individuals, groups, families and communities. This research spans the full range of problems including global poverty, food and housing insecurity, economic development, environmental safety, social determinants of health, maternal and child health, mental health, addiction, disease and illness, gender and income inequality, human rights and social justice, access to health care and social resources, strengthening care and service delivery, trauma, crises, and responses to natural disasters, war, violence, population movements and trafficking, war and refugees, immigration/migration, human trafficking, orphans and vulnerable children.  Research that recognizes the significant link between individuals, families and communities and their external environments, as well as the interrelatedness of race, cultural, context and poverty, will be particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
Menstrual Leave in India: Is It Progressive or Regressive? Social Capital’s Importance in Determining Life Satisfaction in Later Life: A Cross-sectional Study Based on Indian Demography A Qualitative Investigation of the Relationships Between Foster Care Stakeholders and Research Is Maternal Health Care Utilization Necessary for Child Health Outcomes in Tanzania? An Instrumental Variable Approach War-Affected South Sudanese in Settings of Preflight, Flight, and Resettlement: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Trauma-Associated Mental Disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1