DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDITY OF THE FRONT CRAWL TECHNIQUE ASSESSMENT TOOL: A PILOT STUDY

IF 0.2 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES Kinesiologia Slovenica Pub Date : 2022-08-08 DOI:10.52165/kinsi.28.2.5-19
J. Kapus, Januša Stibilj, Katarina Košmrlj, Jure Virag
{"title":"DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDITY OF THE FRONT CRAWL TECHNIQUE ASSESSMENT TOOL: A PILOT STUDY","authors":"J. Kapus, Januša Stibilj, Katarina Košmrlj, Jure Virag","doi":"10.52165/kinsi.28.2.5-19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Swim coaches conduct the technique analysis themselves, through observation and qualitative assessment. The latter is based on their own knowledge and experience. They have to identify the technique mistakes and assess them in terms of their impact on the swimmer's performance. Recognizing this, there is a clear need for an assessment tool which can help swimming instructors and coaches in their work with swimmers of different quality levels. The study aimed to first develop and then validate a tool for the front crawl technique assessment (FCTA). Twenty-one experienced swimming instructors and coaches evaluated 48 mistakes most common in the front crawl for their impact on swimming performance. Based on their perceptions, we developed the FCTA tool. By using the FCTA, we numerically evaluated the mistakes that occurred during participants’ maximal 50-meter front crawl test. We found a strong correlation between both the times achieved and amounts of numerically evaluated mistakes made by the participants in the swim test. These results indicated that the FCTA could be a valid tool to effectively assess the technical skills of intermediate and advanced level swimmers in front crawl. However, this was a pilot study, so all conclusions are preliminary and require further research.","PeriodicalId":43206,"journal":{"name":"Kinesiologia Slovenica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kinesiologia Slovenica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52165/kinsi.28.2.5-19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Swim coaches conduct the technique analysis themselves, through observation and qualitative assessment. The latter is based on their own knowledge and experience. They have to identify the technique mistakes and assess them in terms of their impact on the swimmer's performance. Recognizing this, there is a clear need for an assessment tool which can help swimming instructors and coaches in their work with swimmers of different quality levels. The study aimed to first develop and then validate a tool for the front crawl technique assessment (FCTA). Twenty-one experienced swimming instructors and coaches evaluated 48 mistakes most common in the front crawl for their impact on swimming performance. Based on their perceptions, we developed the FCTA tool. By using the FCTA, we numerically evaluated the mistakes that occurred during participants’ maximal 50-meter front crawl test. We found a strong correlation between both the times achieved and amounts of numerically evaluated mistakes made by the participants in the swim test. These results indicated that the FCTA could be a valid tool to effectively assess the technical skills of intermediate and advanced level swimmers in front crawl. However, this was a pilot study, so all conclusions are preliminary and require further research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前爬行技术评估工具的开发与有效性:初步研究
游泳教练自己进行技术分析,通过观察和定性评估。后者是基于自己的知识和经验。他们必须识别技术错误,并根据它们对游泳运动员表现的影响来评估它们。认识到这一点,我们显然需要一种评估工具,以帮助游泳教练和教练与不同水平的游泳者一起工作。该研究旨在首先开发并验证一种用于前爬行技术评估(FCTA)的工具。21位经验丰富的游泳教练评估了48种最常见的前爬泳错误对游泳成绩的影响。基于他们的看法,我们开发了FCTA工具。利用FCTA,我们对参与者在最大50米前爬泳测试中发生的错误进行了数值评估。我们发现,在游泳测试中获得的时间和参与者所犯的数字评估错误数量之间存在很强的相关性。结果表明,FCTA可作为中高级水平游泳运动员自由泳技术水平的有效评价工具。然而,这是一项初步研究,因此所有结论都是初步的,需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Kinesiologia Slovenica
Kinesiologia Slovenica SPORT SCIENCES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
RECOVERY PRACTICES OF SLOVENIAN SPORT CLIMBERS EFFECT OF MANIPULATION OF BASE OF SUPPORT ON CENTER OF PRESSURE: COMPARISON OF CHILDREN WITH AND WITHOUT INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY EXAMINING THE LINK BETWEEN MOTOR FITNESS AND MORPHOLOGY IN 10-YEAR-OLD CHILDREN COGNITIVE CHARACTERISTICS AND SOME FACTORS AFFECTING THE SPRINT AND MEMORY COURSE PERFORMANCE OF ORIENTEERS A COMPARISON OF REPEATED WINGATE BASED OF HIGH INTENSITY INTERVAL TRAINING AND MODERATE INTENSITY CONTINUOUS TRAINING ON AEROBIC CAPACITY UNDER NORMOBARIC HYPOXIA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1