Like, Share, Retweet: Testing Competing Models of the Theory of Planned Behavior to Predict Slacktivism Engagement

A. Noland
{"title":"Like, Share, Retweet: Testing Competing Models of the Theory of Planned Behavior to Predict Slacktivism Engagement","authors":"A. Noland","doi":"10.1080/10495142.2019.1589626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Token support for social causes has been increasingly studied and commented on in recent years. Campaigns such as the Livestrong bracelet, the pink breast cancer ribbons, the Kony 2012 video, the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge, and the Facebook profile picture modifications for marriage equality and support for Paris after the terrorist attacks in November 2015, have been coined “slacktivism” and those who engage in such activities “slacktivists”; however, little empirical research has been done on the topic. Most of the research and commentary on slacktivism focuses on social media activity online. This research tests competing models of the theory of planned behavior in predicting an individual’s slacktivism engagement from their attitudes, norms, perceived behavioral control, and behavioral intention. The results suggest that although the theory may be a plausible representation of the data, behavioral control may not be important in the context of engaging in slacktivism.","PeriodicalId":46735,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing","volume":"32 1","pages":"264 - 285"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10495142.2019.1589626","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2019.1589626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

ABSTRACT Token support for social causes has been increasingly studied and commented on in recent years. Campaigns such as the Livestrong bracelet, the pink breast cancer ribbons, the Kony 2012 video, the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge, and the Facebook profile picture modifications for marriage equality and support for Paris after the terrorist attacks in November 2015, have been coined “slacktivism” and those who engage in such activities “slacktivists”; however, little empirical research has been done on the topic. Most of the research and commentary on slacktivism focuses on social media activity online. This research tests competing models of the theory of planned behavior in predicting an individual’s slacktivism engagement from their attitudes, norms, perceived behavioral control, and behavioral intention. The results suggest that although the theory may be a plausible representation of the data, behavioral control may not be important in the context of engaging in slacktivism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
喜欢,分享,转发:测试计划行为理论的竞争模型来预测懒汉行动主义参与
近年来,对社会事业的代币支持越来越多地受到研究和评论。在2015年11月的恐怖袭击后,Livestrong手镯、癌症粉色乳房缎带、Kony 2012视频、ALS冰桶挑战赛和Facebook个人资料图片修改等活动被称为“休闲主义”,从事此类活动的人被称为”休闲主义者“;然而,对这一主题的实证研究却很少。大多数关于宽松主义的研究和评论都集中在网上社交媒体活动上。这项研究测试了计划行为理论的竞争模型,从他们的态度、规范、感知的行为控制和行为意图来预测个人的懒散行为。研究结果表明,尽管该理论可能是数据的合理表示,但在参与懒散行为主义的背景下,行为控制可能并不重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Conceptualizing Barriers to Individual Recycling: A Qualitative Study with Multiple Stakeholders in Türkiye Nonprofits, Social Media, and Mission Sympathy and Guilt: Optimizing Advertising Appeals for Charitable Giving to Generation Z Do Top managers’ Psychological Attributes Influence Nonprofit Alliances for Resource Acquisition? An Application of Stimulus-Organization-Behavior-Consequence (S-O-B-C) Theory Using Social Media as a Marketing Communication Strategy: Perspectives from Health-Related Non-Profit Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1