Translational imaging in toxicology

IF 3.6 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Current Opinion in Toxicology Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cotox.2020.03.006
Serguei Liachenko
{"title":"Translational imaging in toxicology","authors":"Serguei Liachenko","doi":"10.1016/j.cotox.2020.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>In vivo imaging has a potential to bring innovation to translational toxicology for </span>drug discovery<span><span>. This includes magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography (PET), single photon emission tomography, and </span>computed tomography. The utility of imaging comes from its capacity to provide minimally invasive biomarkers for safety profiling and decision-making in drug discovery. Nonspecific biomarkers, such as magnetic resonance imaging relaxometry, computed tomography density, or PET </span></span><sup>18</sup>F-fluoro-2-deoxy-<span>d</span><span>-glucose are better suited for preclinical general toxicology and clinical monitoring, while specific ones, such as most of PET and single photon emission tomography ligands, are better suited to clarify mechanisms of toxicity or unwanted target engagement. However, the use of these biomarkers is sporadic and governed by scientific interest and availability rather than its utility. A systematic approach is needed to qualify these biomarkers with regulatory authorities so translational imaging could be incorporated into drug development and its unique potential translated into safer and cheaper medicines.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":37736,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Toxicology","volume":"23 ","pages":"Pages 29-38"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cotox.2020.03.006","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246820202030022X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In vivo imaging has a potential to bring innovation to translational toxicology for drug discovery. This includes magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography (PET), single photon emission tomography, and computed tomography. The utility of imaging comes from its capacity to provide minimally invasive biomarkers for safety profiling and decision-making in drug discovery. Nonspecific biomarkers, such as magnetic resonance imaging relaxometry, computed tomography density, or PET 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose are better suited for preclinical general toxicology and clinical monitoring, while specific ones, such as most of PET and single photon emission tomography ligands, are better suited to clarify mechanisms of toxicity or unwanted target engagement. However, the use of these biomarkers is sporadic and governed by scientific interest and availability rather than its utility. A systematic approach is needed to qualify these biomarkers with regulatory authorities so translational imaging could be incorporated into drug development and its unique potential translated into safer and cheaper medicines.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
毒理学中的翻译成像
体内成像有可能为药物发现的转化毒理学带来创新。这包括磁共振成像、正电子发射断层扫描(PET)、单光子发射断层扫描和计算机断层扫描。成像的效用来自于它为药物发现的安全性分析和决策提供微创生物标志物的能力。非特异性生物标志物,如磁共振成像松弛测量、计算机断层扫描密度或PET 18f -氟-2-脱氧-d-葡萄糖更适合于临床前一般毒理学和临床监测,而特异性生物标志物,如大多数PET和单光子发射断层扫描配体,更适合于阐明毒性机制或不想要的靶标接触。然而,这些生物标志物的使用是零星的,受科学兴趣和可用性的支配,而不是其效用。需要一种系统的方法使这些生物标记物获得监管机构的认可,以便将转化成像纳入药物开发,并将其独特的潜力转化为更安全、更便宜的药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Toxicology
Current Opinion in Toxicology Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Toxicology
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: The aims and scope of Current Opinion in Toxicology is to systematically provide the reader with timely and provocative views and opinions of the highest qualified and recognized experts on current advances in selected topics within the field of toxicology. The goal is that Current Opinion in Toxicology will be an invaluable source of information and perspective for researchers, teachers, managers and administrators, policy makers and students. Division of the subject into sections: For this purpose, the scope of Toxicology is divided into six selected high impact themed sections, each of which is reviewed once a year: Mechanistic Toxicology, Metabolic Toxicology, Risk assessment in Toxicology, Genomic Toxicology, Systems Toxicology, Translational Toxicology.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Mixture toxicity: A hot topic in toxicology and chemical risk assessment Editorial: Guardians of Tomorrow: Developmental Toxicology for Future Generations Editorial: Role of the microbiome in toxicology How single-cell transcriptomics provides insight on hepatic responses to TCDD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1