Pub Date : 2025-12-31DOI: 10.1016/j.cotox.2025.100569
Gurugowtham Ulaganathan , Susan K. Murphy
Cannabidiol (CBD) use has rapidly increased among adolescents, young adults, and pregnant individuals over the last decade. This trend is, in part, fueled by the perception of CBD as relatively harmless, a notion bolstered by its nonpsychoactive nature and the expanding legalization of cannabis products across the United States. CBD readily crosses both the placenta and blood–brain barriers, raising concerns about its impacts on fetal development. This concern is further heightened because its antiemetic and anxiolytic properties are most sought after in early pregnancy, during a time spanning the foundational stages of neurodevelopment. Despite this, CBD's effects on embryonic and fetal development, including neurodevelopment, remain poorly understood. Neurodevelopment is an extended and tightly structured process marked by multiple developmental windows of susceptibility to external perturbations. CBD-induced disruption of early ontogenic trajectories can result in long-term structural and functional deficits. Yet, given the increase in gestational CBD use and the absence of recommended thresholds for use from regulatory or advisory bodies, CBD safety needs to be revisited in the context of its recreational, self-medicating, and therapeutic uses. This lack of understanding must be urgently addressed as CBD use continues to expand while the vulnerability of the developing brain remains a pressing and persistent concern.
{"title":"Cannabidiol and neurodevelopment: Is perception outpacing proof?","authors":"Gurugowtham Ulaganathan , Susan K. Murphy","doi":"10.1016/j.cotox.2025.100569","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cotox.2025.100569","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cannabidiol (CBD) use has rapidly increased among adolescents, young adults, and pregnant individuals over the last decade. This trend is, in part, fueled by the perception of CBD as relatively harmless, a notion bolstered by its nonpsychoactive nature and the expanding legalization of cannabis products across the United States. CBD readily crosses both the placenta and blood–brain barriers, raising concerns about its impacts on fetal development. This concern is further heightened because its antiemetic and anxiolytic properties are most sought after in early pregnancy, during a time spanning the foundational stages of neurodevelopment. Despite this, CBD's effects on embryonic and fetal development, including neurodevelopment, remain poorly understood. Neurodevelopment is an extended and tightly structured process marked by multiple developmental windows of susceptibility to external perturbations. CBD-induced disruption of early ontogenic trajectories can result in long-term structural and functional deficits. Yet, given the increase in gestational CBD use and the absence of recommended thresholds for use from regulatory or advisory bodies, CBD safety needs to be revisited in the context of its recreational, self-medicating, and therapeutic uses. This lack of understanding must be urgently addressed as CBD use continues to expand while the vulnerability of the developing brain remains a pressing and persistent concern.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93968,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in toxicology","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 100569"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146037612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-29DOI: 10.1016/j.cotox.2025.100568
Alexandra Kane , Gillian Watson , Daniel J. Corsi
Cannabis is a recreational drug that is also widely used for its potential therapeutic benefits. Cannabis use has increased in recent years, and products are increasingly accessible in jurisdictions where it has been legalized and commercially distributed. In addition, higher-potency forms of cannabis are now frequently available than in previous decades. In this paper, we discuss the epidemiology and toxicological aspects of cannabis use in relation to its impacts on reproductive function and offspring development. Cannabis and its chemical components tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol demonstrate mild to moderate reproductive and developmental toxicity and adverse effects on exposed humans and animals. A robust biological plausibility exists for a causal association between cannabis use and outcomes through endocannabinoid system disruption and other mechanisms; however, the epidemiological data remain challenging to interpret due to potential confounding. Despite these limitations, continued monitoring of cannabis use in the human population for associations with reproductive and developmental outcomes remains an important public health concern, especially with recent increases in cannabis use prevalence and the move toward legalization in several countries.
{"title":"Toxicological effects of cannabis on reproduction and human development","authors":"Alexandra Kane , Gillian Watson , Daniel J. Corsi","doi":"10.1016/j.cotox.2025.100568","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cotox.2025.100568","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cannabis is a recreational drug that is also widely used for its potential therapeutic benefits. Cannabis use has increased in recent years, and products are increasingly accessible in jurisdictions where it has been legalized and commercially distributed. In addition, higher-potency forms of cannabis are now frequently available than in previous decades. In this paper, we discuss the epidemiology and toxicological aspects of cannabis use in relation to its impacts on reproductive function and offspring development. Cannabis and its chemical components tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol demonstrate mild to moderate reproductive and developmental toxicity and adverse effects on exposed humans and animals. A robust biological plausibility exists for a causal association between cannabis use and outcomes through endocannabinoid system disruption and other mechanisms; however, the epidemiological data remain challenging to interpret due to potential confounding. Despite these limitations, continued monitoring of cannabis use in the human population for associations with reproductive and developmental outcomes remains an important public health concern, especially with recent increases in cannabis use prevalence and the move toward legalization in several countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93968,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in toxicology","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 100568"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146037611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-15DOI: 10.1016/j.cotox.2025.100567
Marissa L. Smith , Autumn J. Bernal , Roxana E. Weil , Willie J. McKinney , Julia Hoeng
Cannabis use is rising globally in consumer and medicinal products that are ingested, inhaled, or applied topically. Due to cultivation and manufacturing processes, cannabis plant materials and plant-based products may contain detectable levels of microbial and elemental contaminants of human health concern. A review of regulations and identification of toxicological reference values for these compounds in cannabis is necessary to protect public health and guide manufacturers in regions lacking contaminant regulations.
This review evaluated international and U.S. state regulations and guidance for impurities in cannabis plant material and final consumer products to identify toxicological reference values for common contaminants. A three-step process was used to identify reference values protective of public health for common microbial and elemental contaminants. An initial literature review of contaminants in cannabis and cannabis-based products was conducted, followed by a focal review of international and U.S. state contaminant regulations. A tiered approach was developed to assess the reliability and relevance of each data source, selecting reference values from Tier 1 and Tier 2 sources. The most conservative values were recommended to best protect human health.
While some regions have developed regulations for evaluating contaminants in cannabis products, these vary widely, and significant gaps remain across the industry. In regions without regulations, these discrepancies make it difficult for manufacturers aiming to protect human health to determine which guidance and reference values to follow.
{"title":"Identification of reference values intended to be protective of human health for potential contaminants in hemp plant material and hemp-based products: Part I. Microbial and elemental contaminants","authors":"Marissa L. Smith , Autumn J. Bernal , Roxana E. Weil , Willie J. McKinney , Julia Hoeng","doi":"10.1016/j.cotox.2025.100567","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cotox.2025.100567","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cannabis use is rising globally in consumer and medicinal products that are ingested, inhaled, or applied topically. Due to cultivation and manufacturing processes, cannabis plant materials and plant-based products may contain detectable levels of microbial and elemental contaminants of human health concern. A review of regulations and identification of toxicological reference values for these compounds in cannabis is necessary to protect public health and guide manufacturers in regions lacking contaminant regulations.</div><div>This review evaluated international and U.S. state regulations and guidance for impurities in cannabis plant material and final consumer products to identify toxicological reference values for common contaminants. A three-step process was used to identify reference values protective of public health for common microbial and elemental contaminants. An initial literature review of contaminants in cannabis and cannabis-based products was conducted, followed by a focal review of international and U.S. state contaminant regulations. A tiered approach was developed to assess the reliability and relevance of each data source, selecting reference values from Tier 1 and Tier 2 sources. The most conservative values were recommended to best protect human health.</div><div>While some regions have developed regulations for evaluating contaminants in cannabis products, these vary widely, and significant gaps remain across the industry. In regions without regulations, these discrepancies make it difficult for manufacturers aiming to protect human health to determine which guidance and reference values to follow.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93968,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in toxicology","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 100567"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145926469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-13DOI: 10.1016/j.cotox.2025.100554
Maria Katsigeorgis, Terry Gordon
As cannabis legalization expands and its stigma declines, a growing number of pregnant and postpartum women are using cannabis products, often without medical guidance. These women, colloquially referred to as “canna-moms”, frequently turn to cannabinoids like tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) or cannabidiol (CBD) to manage peripartum symptoms such as nausea, insomnia, anxiety, and postpartum depression. Despite increasing popularity, there is cause for concern as THC has been shown to cross the placental barrier and transfer into the breast milk of users, potentially interfering with healthy neurodevelopment both in utero and ex utero. Additionally, inhaled cannabis products may exacerbate pulmonary inflammation during the physiologically sensitive periods of pregnancy and lactation. Belying CBD’s reputation as a safe and natural compound, its safety in peripartum populations is not well understood. This is compounded by labeling inconsistencies and contamination of commercial products. Regulatory gaps and disparities in risk perception create an additional layer of complexity in patient-provider conversations. Here we review toxicological evidence in both gestational and postpartum periods, highlight knowledge gaps particularly for CBD, identify urgent clinical and scientific research needs, and call for a patient-informed policy reform. Until safety and evidence-based guidelines are established, a precautionary approach to cannabis use surrounding pregnancy remains essential for the protection of maternal and fetal well-being.
{"title":"The unexpected when expecting: Cannabinoid use in pregnancy and postpartum","authors":"Maria Katsigeorgis, Terry Gordon","doi":"10.1016/j.cotox.2025.100554","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cotox.2025.100554","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As cannabis legalization expands and its stigma declines, a growing number of pregnant and postpartum women are using cannabis products, often without medical guidance. These women, colloquially referred to as “canna-moms”, frequently turn to cannabinoids like tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) or cannabidiol (CBD) to manage peripartum symptoms such as nausea, insomnia, anxiety, and postpartum depression. Despite increasing popularity, there is cause for concern as THC has been shown to cross the placental barrier and transfer into the breast milk of users, potentially interfering with healthy neurodevelopment both in utero and ex utero. Additionally, inhaled cannabis products may exacerbate pulmonary inflammation during the physiologically sensitive periods of pregnancy and lactation. Belying CBD’s reputation as a safe and natural compound, its safety in peripartum populations is not well understood. This is compounded by labeling inconsistencies and contamination of commercial products. Regulatory gaps and disparities in risk perception create an additional layer of complexity in patient-provider conversations. Here we review toxicological evidence in both gestational and postpartum periods, highlight knowledge gaps particularly for CBD, identify urgent clinical and scientific research needs, and call for a patient-informed policy reform. Until safety and evidence-based guidelines are established, a precautionary approach to cannabis use surrounding pregnancy remains essential for the protection of maternal and fetal well-being.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93968,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in toxicology","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 100554"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145926470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-07DOI: 10.1016/j.cotox.2025.100555
Marissa L. Smith , Autumn J. Bernal , Roxana E. Weil , Willie J. McKinney , Julia Hoeng
Cannabis use is rising globally in consumer and medicinal products that are ingested, inhaled, or applied topically. Due to cultivation and manufacturing processes, cannabis plant materials and plant-based products may contain detectable levels of pesticides and residual solvents of human health concern. A review of regulations and identification of toxicological reference values for these compounds on cannabis is necessary to protect public health and guide manufacturers in regions lacking contaminant regulations.
This review evaluated international and U.S. state regulations and guidance for impurities in cannabis plant material and final consumer products to identify toxicological reference values for common contaminants. A three-step process was used to identify reference values protective of public health for pesticide and residual solvent contaminants. First, a literature review of contaminants in cannabis and cannabis-based products was conducted, followed by a review of international and U.S. state contaminant regulations. A tiered approach was developed to assess the reliability and relevance of each data source, selecting reference values from Tier 1 and Tier 2 sources. The most conservative values were recommended to best protect human health.
While some regions have developed regulations for evaluating contaminants in cannabis products, these vary widely, and significant gaps remain across the industry. In regions without regulations, these discrepancies make it difficult for manufacturers aiming to protect human health to determine which guidance and reference values to follow.
{"title":"Identification of reference values intended to be protective of human health for potential contaminants in hemp plant material and hemp-based products: Part II. Pesticides and solvents","authors":"Marissa L. Smith , Autumn J. Bernal , Roxana E. Weil , Willie J. McKinney , Julia Hoeng","doi":"10.1016/j.cotox.2025.100555","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cotox.2025.100555","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cannabis use is rising globally in consumer and medicinal products that are ingested, inhaled, or applied topically. Due to cultivation and manufacturing processes, cannabis plant materials and plant-based products may contain detectable levels of pesticides and residual solvents of human health concern. A review of regulations and identification of toxicological reference values for these compounds on cannabis is necessary to protect public health and guide manufacturers in regions lacking contaminant regulations.</div><div>This review evaluated international and U.S. state regulations and guidance for impurities in cannabis plant material and final consumer products to identify toxicological reference values for common contaminants. A three-step process was used to identify reference values protective of public health for pesticide and residual solvent contaminants. First, a literature review of contaminants in cannabis and cannabis-based products was conducted, followed by a review of international and U.S. state contaminant regulations. A tiered approach was developed to assess the reliability and relevance of each data source, selecting reference values from Tier 1 and Tier 2 sources. The most conservative values were recommended to best protect human health.</div><div>While some regions have developed regulations for evaluating contaminants in cannabis products, these vary widely, and significant gaps remain across the industry. In regions without regulations, these discrepancies make it difficult for manufacturers aiming to protect human health to determine which guidance and reference values to follow.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93968,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in toxicology","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 100555"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145884024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-06DOI: 10.1016/j.cotox.2025.100564
Emily T. Wilson , Nicole S. Heimbach , David H. Eidelman , Carolyn J. Baglole
As cannabis use becomes increasingly mainstream for both recreational and medicinal purposes, scientific evaluation of its health effects has not kept pace with legalization and market expansion. This gap echoes historical missteps seen in tobacco regulation, where decades passed before sufficient mechanistic and epidemiologic data on health effects prompted policy action. To avoid repeating such delays in action, this paper advocates for the integration of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) in cannabis toxicology research, particularly for inhaled products; these tools prioritize human relevance, mechanistic insight, and reduction of animal testing. We highlight three key domains of innovation: (1) air–liquid interface (ALI) exposure systems that more accurately model inhaled cannabis products; (2) human-derived cell models and organoids, including those from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), which provide insight into tissue-specific toxicity; and (3) computational toxicology platforms such as quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) and physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling, which support high-throughput, mechanism-based risk assessment. Together, these tools offer a robust framework for evaluating the diverse and complex constituents of cannabis products, enabling proactive risk assessment and regulation for cannabis-based products.
{"title":"New approaches to historical challenges: Avoiding the early missteps of tobacco research in cannabis studies","authors":"Emily T. Wilson , Nicole S. Heimbach , David H. Eidelman , Carolyn J. Baglole","doi":"10.1016/j.cotox.2025.100564","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cotox.2025.100564","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As cannabis use becomes increasingly mainstream for both recreational and medicinal purposes, scientific evaluation of its health effects has not kept pace with legalization and market expansion. This gap echoes historical missteps seen in tobacco regulation, where decades passed before sufficient mechanistic and epidemiologic data on health effects prompted policy action. To avoid repeating such delays in action, this paper advocates for the integration of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) in cannabis toxicology research, particularly for inhaled products; these tools prioritize human relevance, mechanistic insight, and reduction of animal testing. We highlight three key domains of innovation: (1) air–liquid interface (ALI) exposure systems that more accurately model inhaled cannabis products; (2) human-derived cell models and organoids, including those from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), which provide insight into tissue-specific toxicity; and (3) computational toxicology platforms such as quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) and physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling, which support high-throughput, mechanism-based risk assessment. Together, these tools offer a robust framework for evaluating the diverse and complex constituents of cannabis products, enabling proactive risk assessment and regulation for cannabis-based products.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93968,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in toxicology","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 100564"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145926468","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-04DOI: 10.1016/j.cotox.2025.100553
Thomas Lancaster , Kevin Trouba , Dino Manca
Cannabidiol oral solution (CBD-OS; Epidiolex® [US]/Epidyolex® [Europe], 100 mg/mL oral solution) produced from the Cannabis sativa plant is indicated for the treatment of seizures associated with Lennox–Gastaut syndrome, Dravet syndrome, or tuberous sclerosis complex. The toxicity of CBD-oral solution (CBD-OS) was extensively examined in a variety of in vitro and in vivo nonclinical safety studies. Regulatory-guided studies in the rat, mouse, dog, and rabbit evaluated short-term and chronic toxicity, carcinogenicity, and reproductive toxicity of CBD-OS. In vitro mutagenicity and genotoxicity studies complemented animal toxicology studies. In repeat dose oral toxicity studies of varying durations, noteworthy CBD-OS–related changes were evident in the liver but were not adverse and considered adaptive (consequent to enzyme induction). In reproductive toxicology studies in rats and rabbits, average litter size, embryonic viability, or fetal wastage was not influenced by oral CBD-OS. When administered to male rats, CBD-OS did not affect fertility. CBD-OS did not elicit mutagenic or cytogenetic alterations in genotoxicity assessments in vitro and in vivo and did not indicate a potential for translatable carcinogenicity in dedicated rodent studies. Furthermore, CBD-OS is considered to have limited abuse liability as demonstrated in dedicated in vivo behavioral and in vitro pharmacological studies. The nonclinical toxicology studies described herein (including those completed post approval) supported the initial marketing application of CBD-OS. As part of a series of postmarketing regulatory requirements, metabolite qualification studies remain ongoing at the time of authorship of this manuscript. Overall, the available preclinical data indicate that CBD-OS was well tolerated in animals at doses/exposures exceeding the maximum recommended therapeutic doses in pediatric and adult patients.
{"title":"An overview of the nonclinical toxicology of cannabidiol oral solution, the first approved therapeutic cannabidiol","authors":"Thomas Lancaster , Kevin Trouba , Dino Manca","doi":"10.1016/j.cotox.2025.100553","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cotox.2025.100553","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cannabidiol oral solution (CBD-OS; Epidiolex® [US]/Epidyolex® [Europe], 100 mg/mL oral solution) produced from the <em>Cannabis sativa</em> plant is indicated for the treatment of seizures associated with Lennox–Gastaut syndrome, Dravet syndrome, or tuberous sclerosis complex. The toxicity of CBD-oral solution (CBD-OS) was extensively examined in a variety of <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> nonclinical safety studies. Regulatory-guided studies in the rat, mouse, dog, and rabbit evaluated short-term and chronic toxicity, carcinogenicity, and reproductive toxicity of CBD-OS. <em>In vitro</em> mutagenicity and genotoxicity studies complemented animal toxicology studies. In repeat dose oral toxicity studies of varying durations, noteworthy CBD-OS–related changes were evident in the liver but were not adverse and considered adaptive (consequent to enzyme induction). In reproductive toxicology studies in rats and rabbits, average litter size, embryonic viability, or fetal wastage was not influenced by oral CBD-OS. When administered to male rats, CBD-OS did not affect fertility. CBD-OS did not elicit mutagenic or cytogenetic alterations in genotoxicity assessments <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> and did not indicate a potential for translatable carcinogenicity in dedicated rodent studies. Furthermore, CBD-OS is considered to have limited abuse liability as demonstrated in dedicated <em>in vivo</em> behavioral and <em>in vitro</em> pharmacological studies. The nonclinical toxicology studies described herein (including those completed post approval) supported the initial marketing application of CBD-OS. As part of a series of postmarketing regulatory requirements, metabolite qualification studies remain ongoing at the time of authorship of this manuscript. Overall, the available preclinical data indicate that CBD-OS was well tolerated in animals at doses/exposures exceeding the maximum recommended therapeutic doses in pediatric and adult patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93968,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in toxicology","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 100553"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145926471","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-15DOI: 10.1016/j.cotox.2025.100552
Barbara L.F. Kaplan , Uma V.A. Dhanabalan
The endocannabinoid system (ECS) is a physiological system consisting of cannabinoids receptors (CBs), endogenous lipid-based ligands, known as endocannabinoids, and the enzymes responsible for synthesis and metabolism. Unlike other systems, the discovery of the ECS was relatively recent. Therefore, for many health professionals that currently support the use of medical cannabis for their patients, their knowledge about the ECS and cannabinoid pharmacology was independently acquired. This manuscript aims to provide foundational information about the ECS and cannabinoid pharmacology, advocate for increased education on these topics among all healthcare providers, particularly in regions with established medical cannabis programs, and to promote the inclusion of ECS-related content in curricula of biomedical education programs (e.g., medical, veterinary, pharmacy, nursing). We also recommend a consistent use of the term cannabis in place of marijuana as it reflects the plants’ formal name and helps avoid historical stigma. Staying informed about the ECS and cannabinoid pharmacology empowers healthcare professionals to offer optimal guidance regarding product selection, therapeutic efficacy, dosing, administration methods, and management of potential drug interactions and adverse effects.
{"title":"Professional needs regarding cannabis: Learning about the endocannabinoid system and cannabinoid pharmacology","authors":"Barbara L.F. Kaplan , Uma V.A. Dhanabalan","doi":"10.1016/j.cotox.2025.100552","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cotox.2025.100552","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The endocannabinoid system (ECS) is a physiological system consisting of cannabinoids receptors (CBs), endogenous lipid-based ligands, known as endocannabinoids, and the enzymes responsible for synthesis and metabolism. Unlike other systems, the discovery of the ECS was relatively recent. Therefore, for many health professionals that currently support the use of medical cannabis for their patients, their knowledge about the ECS and cannabinoid pharmacology was independently acquired. This manuscript aims to provide foundational information about the ECS and cannabinoid pharmacology, advocate for increased education on these topics among all healthcare providers, particularly in regions with established medical cannabis programs, and to promote the inclusion of ECS-related content in curricula of biomedical education programs (e.g., medical, veterinary, pharmacy, nursing). We also recommend a consistent use of the term cannabis in place of marijuana as it reflects the plants’ formal name and helps avoid historical stigma. Staying informed about the ECS and cannabinoid pharmacology empowers healthcare professionals to offer optimal guidance regarding product selection, therapeutic efficacy, dosing, administration methods, and management of potential drug interactions and adverse effects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93968,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in toxicology","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 100552"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145685942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.cotox.2025.100551
João Pedro Silva , Félix Carvalho
Cannabis and cannabinoid-based products (e.g., dronabinol, nabilone, cannabidiol, nabiximols) have been clinically used for the treatment of different symptoms (e.g., nausea and vomiting in patients subjected to chemotherapy, pain, seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut and Dravet syndromes, or multiple sclerosis-associated spasticity) in which conventional treatments have failed. However, there is accumulating evidence suggesting that even the medically-supervised use of these substances may lead to the onset of especially critical neuropsychiatric outcomes, such as psychoses and suicidal ideation.
Considering that the medicinal use of cannabis and cannabinoids is expected to further increase as a result of recent legislation changes in different territories worldwide, it is critical to analyze the most recent data on their neuropsychiatric adverse effects. As such, we review recent clinical trials and pharmacovigilance evidence on the mechanisms underlying cannabinoid-induced psychoses and suicidality.
{"title":"Medicinal cannabinoid use and the risk of developing psychoses and suicidality","authors":"João Pedro Silva , Félix Carvalho","doi":"10.1016/j.cotox.2025.100551","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cotox.2025.100551","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cannabis and cannabinoid-based products (e.g., dronabinol, nabilone, cannabidiol, nabiximols) have been clinically used for the treatment of different symptoms (e.g., nausea and vomiting in patients subjected to chemotherapy, pain, seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut and Dravet syndromes, or multiple sclerosis-associated spasticity) in which conventional treatments have failed. However, there is accumulating evidence suggesting that even the medically-supervised use of these substances may lead to the onset of especially critical neuropsychiatric outcomes, such as psychoses and suicidal ideation.</div><div>Considering that the medicinal use of cannabis and cannabinoids is expected to further increase as a result of recent legislation changes in different territories worldwide, it is critical to analyze the most recent data on their neuropsychiatric adverse effects. As such, we review recent clinical trials and pharmacovigilance evidence on the mechanisms underlying cannabinoid-induced psychoses and suicidality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93968,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in toxicology","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 100551"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145579327","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}