LIFT and the London 2012 Olympics: Spectacular Experiences

IF 0.3 3区 艺术学 0 THEATER NEW THEATRE QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2023-01-30 DOI:10.1017/S0266464X22000343
Phoebe Patey-Ferguson
{"title":"LIFT and the London 2012 Olympics: Spectacular Experiences","authors":"Phoebe Patey-Ferguson","doi":"10.1017/S0266464X22000343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2012, London staged the Olympic Games and the associated Cultural Olympiad, which produced the ‘London 2012’ Festival, funding a wide series of events including many productions by the London International Festival of Theatre (LIFT). A decade on, this article considers the impact of these overlapping events during a period of unprecedented austerity in the United Kingdom, and how arts events might be considered as having colluded with the government’s own agenda. The connection between neoliberal governance, with its programme of increased privatization, rapid gentrification, and the opportunistic marketing of diversity is examined with reference to increasing nationalism through Olympiad displays, together with the increasing influence of the ‘experience economy’ as defined by Joseph Pine and James Gilmore. Phoebe Patey-Ferguson is a Lecturer in Theatre and Social Change at Rose Bruford College. This article, derived from their PhD on LIFT in its social, cultural, and political context, follows ‘LIFT and the GLC versus Thatcher: London’s Cultural Battleground in 1981’ (NTQ 141) and, in the same issue, Patey-Ferguson’s interview with LIFT’s founding Artistic Directors, Rose Fenton and Lucy Neal.","PeriodicalId":43990,"journal":{"name":"NEW THEATRE QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEW THEATRE QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266464X22000343","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2012, London staged the Olympic Games and the associated Cultural Olympiad, which produced the ‘London 2012’ Festival, funding a wide series of events including many productions by the London International Festival of Theatre (LIFT). A decade on, this article considers the impact of these overlapping events during a period of unprecedented austerity in the United Kingdom, and how arts events might be considered as having colluded with the government’s own agenda. The connection between neoliberal governance, with its programme of increased privatization, rapid gentrification, and the opportunistic marketing of diversity is examined with reference to increasing nationalism through Olympiad displays, together with the increasing influence of the ‘experience economy’ as defined by Joseph Pine and James Gilmore. Phoebe Patey-Ferguson is a Lecturer in Theatre and Social Change at Rose Bruford College. This article, derived from their PhD on LIFT in its social, cultural, and political context, follows ‘LIFT and the GLC versus Thatcher: London’s Cultural Battleground in 1981’ (NTQ 141) and, in the same issue, Patey-Ferguson’s interview with LIFT’s founding Artistic Directors, Rose Fenton and Lucy Neal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LIFT与2012年伦敦奥运会:精彩体验
2012年,伦敦举办了奥林匹克运动会和相关的文化奥林匹克运动会,产生了“2012伦敦”艺术节,资助了一系列活动,包括伦敦国际戏剧节(LIFT)的许多作品。十年过去了,这篇文章考虑了在英国前所未有的紧缩时期,这些重叠事件的影响,以及艺术活动如何被视为与政府自己的议程勾结。新自由主义治理及其增加私有化、快速绅士化的计划和多样性的机会主义营销之间的联系,是参照奥林匹克展示中日益增长的民族主义,以及Joseph Pine和James Gilmore定义的“体验经济”日益增加的影响力来研究的。Phoebe Patey Ferguson是Rose Bruford学院戏剧与社会变革讲师。这篇文章源于他们在社会、文化和政治背景下对LIFT的博士研究,继《LIFT和GLC与撒切尔:1981年伦敦的文化战场》(NTQ 141)之后,在同一期中,Patey Ferguson采访了LIFT的创始艺术总监Rose Fenton和Lucy Neal。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: New Theatre Quarterly provides a vital international forum where theatrical scholarship and practice can meet and where prevailing dramatic assumptions can be subjected to vigorous critical questioning. It shows that theatre history has a contemporary relevance, that theatre studies need a methodology and that theatre criticism needs a language. The journal publishes news, analysis and debate within the field of theatre studies.
期刊最新文献
Documentary and Community Theatre with Young People in Madrid: The Creative Process of Mundo Quinta Embodied Gestures of Human Rights: Remorse, Sentiment, and Sympathy in Romantic Regency Drama British Theatre from Agitprop to ‘Primark Playwriting’ Othello: A Moor Rorschach Test Mysticism as Transgression in Chista Yasrebi’s Rahil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1