Distance Between Two Keplerian Orbits

IF 0.7 Q4 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Artificial Satellites-Journal of Planetary Geodesy Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.2478/arsa-2021-0006
Ayman Homda Mohamed, H. Dwidar, Inal Adham, A. Bakry, A. El-Raffie
{"title":"Distance Between Two Keplerian Orbits","authors":"Ayman Homda Mohamed, H. Dwidar, Inal Adham, A. Bakry, A. El-Raffie","doi":"10.2478/arsa-2021-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this paper, constrained minimization for the point of closest approach of two conic sections is developed. For this development, we considered the nine cases of possible conics, namely, (elliptic–elliptic), (elliptic–parabolic), (elliptic–hyperbolic), (parabolic–elliptic), (parabolic–parabolic), (parabolic–hyperbolic), (hyperbolic–elliptic), (hyperbolic–parabolic), and (hyperbolic–hyperbolic). The developments are considered from two points of view, namely, analytical and computational. For the analytical developments, the literal expression of the minimum distance equation (S) and the constraint equation (G), including the first and second derivatives for each case, are established. For the computational developments, we construct an efficient algorithm for calculating the minimum distance by using the Lagrange multiplier method under the constraint on time. Finally, we compute the closest distance S between two conics for some orbits. The accuracy of the solutions was checked under the conditions that L|solution ≤ ɛ1; G|solution ≤ ɛ2, where ɛ1,2 < 10−10. For the cases of (parabolic–parabolic), (parabolic–hyperbolic), and (hyperbolic–hyperbolic), we studied thousands of comets, but the condition of the closest approach was not met.","PeriodicalId":43216,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Satellites-Journal of Planetary Geodesy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Satellites-Journal of Planetary Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/arsa-2021-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, constrained minimization for the point of closest approach of two conic sections is developed. For this development, we considered the nine cases of possible conics, namely, (elliptic–elliptic), (elliptic–parabolic), (elliptic–hyperbolic), (parabolic–elliptic), (parabolic–parabolic), (parabolic–hyperbolic), (hyperbolic–elliptic), (hyperbolic–parabolic), and (hyperbolic–hyperbolic). The developments are considered from two points of view, namely, analytical and computational. For the analytical developments, the literal expression of the minimum distance equation (S) and the constraint equation (G), including the first and second derivatives for each case, are established. For the computational developments, we construct an efficient algorithm for calculating the minimum distance by using the Lagrange multiplier method under the constraint on time. Finally, we compute the closest distance S between two conics for some orbits. The accuracy of the solutions was checked under the conditions that L|solution ≤ ɛ1; G|solution ≤ ɛ2, where ɛ1,2 < 10−10. For the cases of (parabolic–parabolic), (parabolic–hyperbolic), and (hyperbolic–hyperbolic), we studied thousands of comets, but the condition of the closest approach was not met.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两个开普勒轨道之间的距离
摘要本文研究了两个二次曲线最接近点的约束最小化问题。为此,我们考虑了九种可能的二次曲线,即(椭圆-椭圆),(椭圆-抛物线),(椭圆-双曲),(抛物线-椭圆),(抛物线-抛物线),(抛物线-双曲),(双曲-椭圆),(双曲-双曲)和(双曲-双曲)。从分析和计算两个角度来考虑这些发展。对于解析发展,建立了最小距离方程(S)和约束方程(G)的文字表达式,包括每种情况的一阶和二阶导数。在计算方面,我们利用拉格朗日乘子法构造了在时间约束下计算最小距离的有效算法。最后,我们计算了一些轨道上两个圆锥曲线之间的最近距离S。在L|溶液≤1的条件下,检验了解的准确性;G|解≤2,其中,2 < 10−10。对于(抛物线-抛物线)、(抛物线-双曲)和(双曲-双曲)的情况,我们研究了数千颗彗星,但不满足最接近的条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Similarities and Differences in the Earth’s Water Variations Signal Provided by Grace and AMSR-E Observations Using Maximum Covariance Analysis at Various Land Cover Data Backgrounds Medium- and Long-Term Prediction of Polar Motion Using Weighted Least Squares Extrapolation and Vector Autoregressive Modeling Study on Secular Change of the Earth’s Rotation Rate Based on Solar Eclipse Observation Records on October 13, 443 BC Interstellar Probe: Science, Engineering, Logistic, Economic, and Social Factors Geodynamic Studies in the Pieniny Klippen Belt in 2004–2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1