Legal status of the territory of Crimea after the accession of Russia

Leheza Yevhen, D. Pryimachenko, Vita Moroz, Tetiana Pakulova, O. Salo
{"title":"Legal status of the territory of Crimea after the accession of Russia","authors":"Leheza Yevhen, D. Pryimachenko, Vita Moroz, Tetiana Pakulova, O. Salo","doi":"10.24862/rcdu.v13i2.1632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the research. The purpose of the article consists in  determination of the current international legal regime of the territory of Crimea for further proper argumentation of Ukraine’s position in interstate disputes with the Russian Federation. Main content. Various forms of foreign military presence on the territory of a state have been studied, such as: occupation, conquest, deployment of foreign military bases, annexation, etc. Determined are signs that characterize the legal regimes of occupation and annexation and their international regulation. Methodology:  Review of materials and methods based on analysis of documentary materials of the annexation of Crimea on the part of Russia. Conclusions. Characteristic features of annexation being currently a kind of aggression crime include unilateral declaration of state sovereignty over a territory which have not been a part of this state, as well as the legitimation of annexation through de facto ownership of a territory and international recognition of this fact. According to the international law, there is currently no legal mechanism for the transfer of sovereignty over territory to an aggressor through annexation. \nKey words: annexation, conquest, foreign military presence, occupation, sovereignty.","PeriodicalId":53730,"journal":{"name":"Revista do Curso de Direito do UNIFOR","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista do Curso de Direito do UNIFOR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24862/rcdu.v13i2.1632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The purpose of the research. The purpose of the article consists in  determination of the current international legal regime of the territory of Crimea for further proper argumentation of Ukraine’s position in interstate disputes with the Russian Federation. Main content. Various forms of foreign military presence on the territory of a state have been studied, such as: occupation, conquest, deployment of foreign military bases, annexation, etc. Determined are signs that characterize the legal regimes of occupation and annexation and their international regulation. Methodology:  Review of materials and methods based on analysis of documentary materials of the annexation of Crimea on the part of Russia. Conclusions. Characteristic features of annexation being currently a kind of aggression crime include unilateral declaration of state sovereignty over a territory which have not been a part of this state, as well as the legitimation of annexation through de facto ownership of a territory and international recognition of this fact. According to the international law, there is currently no legal mechanism for the transfer of sovereignty over territory to an aggressor through annexation. Key words: annexation, conquest, foreign military presence, occupation, sovereignty.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄罗斯加入后克里米亚领土的法律地位
研究的目的。本条的目的在于确定克里米亚领土的现行国际法律制度,以便进一步适当论证乌克兰在与俄罗斯联邦的州际争端中的立场。主要内容。研究了外国在一国领土上的各种形式的军事存在,如:占领、征服、部署外国军事基地、吞并等。确定了占领和吞并法律制度及其国际监管的特征。方法论:在分析俄罗斯吞并克里米亚的文献材料的基础上,回顾材料和方法。结论。吞并目前是一种侵略罪,其特征包括单方面宣布国家对不属于该国的领土的主权,以及通过对领土的事实所有权和对这一事实的国际承认使吞并合法化。根据国际法,目前没有通过吞并将领土主权移交给侵略者的法律机制。关键词:吞并、征服、外国军事存在、占领、主权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Resenha de "Polícia Judiciária Militar e seus procedimentos pré-processuais" Book Review Political political theory: essays on Institutions O discurso manipulatório das Plataformas Digitais e os efeitos objetivos e subjetivos na relação de emprego Punitivismo dos atos infracionais de tráfico de drogas na jurisprudência do Tribunal de Justiça do Rio Grande de Sul e o seu descompasso com a Súmula 492 do STJ Breve estudo sobre a seletividade de mulheres pretas no crime de tráfico de drogas no Brasil à luz da necropolítica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1