University-industry Collaboration and Innovation in Low-tech Industries: the Case of Brazil

IF 2.3 Q3 MANAGEMENT Triple Helix Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI:10.1163/21971927-bja10042
A. Mikhailov, D. Puffal
{"title":"University-industry Collaboration and Innovation in Low-tech Industries: the Case of Brazil","authors":"A. Mikhailov, D. Puffal","doi":"10.1163/21971927-bja10042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nDespite the importance of low-tech manufacturing sectors for national economies, previous studies on UIC benefits for the firms were conducted mostly in high-tech sectors, making the knowledge on the impact of UIC on innovation in low-tech sectors unexplored. The present research aims to identify combinations of UIC s that may lead the low-tech firms to high innovation performance. By using the csQCA technique applied to secondary data from the BR Survey, which is the largest UIC databank in Brazil, the researchers identified that the most intense collaborations in terms of knowledge and resource exchange, such as development-oriented and research-oriented, are among the most beneficial for firms’ innovativeness. Diffusion-oriented UIC does not contribute to innovation, unless it is combined with both research-oriented and development-oriented UIC s. Finally, the csQCA suggests that in most cases the firms should focus on engaging in one specific UIC type rather than split its effort and resources among a mix of UIC. The findings amplify comprehension of the range of impacts that entrepreneurial universities promote in low-tech sector, creating both theory and policy implications.","PeriodicalId":31161,"journal":{"name":"Triple Helix","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Triple Helix","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/21971927-bja10042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the importance of low-tech manufacturing sectors for national economies, previous studies on UIC benefits for the firms were conducted mostly in high-tech sectors, making the knowledge on the impact of UIC on innovation in low-tech sectors unexplored. The present research aims to identify combinations of UIC s that may lead the low-tech firms to high innovation performance. By using the csQCA technique applied to secondary data from the BR Survey, which is the largest UIC databank in Brazil, the researchers identified that the most intense collaborations in terms of knowledge and resource exchange, such as development-oriented and research-oriented, are among the most beneficial for firms’ innovativeness. Diffusion-oriented UIC does not contribute to innovation, unless it is combined with both research-oriented and development-oriented UIC s. Finally, the csQCA suggests that in most cases the firms should focus on engaging in one specific UIC type rather than split its effort and resources among a mix of UIC. The findings amplify comprehension of the range of impacts that entrepreneurial universities promote in low-tech sector, creating both theory and policy implications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低技术产业的校企合作与创新:以巴西为例
尽管低技术制造业对国民经济的重要性,但以往关于企业自主创新利益的研究大多是在高科技行业进行的,这使得关于自主创新对低技术行业创新影响的知识尚未得到探索。本研究旨在找出可能导致低技术企业获得高创新绩效的企业创新能力组合。通过将csQCA技术应用于BR调查(巴西最大的UIC数据库)的二手数据,研究人员发现,在知识和资源交换方面,如以开发为导向和以研究为导向的最强烈的合作是最有利于企业创新的。扩散型的创新大学除非与研究型和发展型的创新大学结合起来,否则不会促进创新。最后,csQCA建议,在大多数情况下,公司应该专注于从事一种特定的UIC类型,而不是将其精力和资源分散到各种UIC中。这些发现扩大了对创业型大学在低技术领域促进的影响范围的理解,创造了理论和政策意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Triple Helix
Triple Helix Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
46.20%
发文量
14
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Key Factors for a Successful Technology Transfer Process of Digital Innovation Assets University-Industry Relationships beyond Technology Transfer: the Role of Intangible Knowledge Demand-oriented Science and Technology Parks: a New Tool for Innovation Policy From the Triple Helix Model of Innovations to the Quantitative Theory of Meaning Measuring Innovation and Collaboration System using Big Data: A Case Study about Ho Chi Minh City
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1