Why Moral Theories Matter: A Review of Ethics and Adoption Literature

IF 0.9 Q3 SOCIAL WORK Adoption Quarterly Pub Date : 2020-02-06 DOI:10.1080/10926755.2020.1719255
Bibiana D. Koh, F. Reamer
{"title":"Why Moral Theories Matter: A Review of Ethics and Adoption Literature","authors":"Bibiana D. Koh, F. Reamer","doi":"10.1080/10926755.2020.1719255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study argues that moral theory is an important aspect of our use of self in adoption practice. Within this context, the authors examined the extent to which ethical theories were explicitly incorporated in the peer-reviewed adoption literature – published between 1996 and 2019 – that purported to focus on ethical issues. Findings from our review suggest that the inclusion of moral theories was largely implicit (e.g., informed by relevant codes of ethics, professional standards, and/or legislation) rather than explicit. Our literature review also revealed a wide range of ethical issues in adoption. Recommendations are made in the context of these findings.","PeriodicalId":45383,"journal":{"name":"Adoption Quarterly","volume":"24 1","pages":"5 - 24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10926755.2020.1719255","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adoption Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2020.1719255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract This study argues that moral theory is an important aspect of our use of self in adoption practice. Within this context, the authors examined the extent to which ethical theories were explicitly incorporated in the peer-reviewed adoption literature – published between 1996 and 2019 – that purported to focus on ethical issues. Findings from our review suggest that the inclusion of moral theories was largely implicit (e.g., informed by relevant codes of ethics, professional standards, and/or legislation) rather than explicit. Our literature review also revealed a wide range of ethical issues in adoption. Recommendations are made in the context of these findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么道德理论很重要:伦理学与收养文学综述
摘要本研究认为,道德理论是我们在收养实践中使用自我的一个重要方面。在这种背景下,作者研究了1996年至2019年间发表的同行评审收养文献中明确纳入伦理理论的程度,这些文献旨在关注伦理问题。我们的审查结果表明,道德理论的纳入在很大程度上是隐含的(例如,受相关道德规范、职业标准和/或立法的影响),而不是明确的。我们的文献综述还揭示了收养过程中的一系列伦理问题。建议是在这些调查结果的背景下提出的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Adoption Quarterly
Adoption Quarterly SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: Adoption Quarterly is an unparalleled forum for examining the issues of child care, of adoption as viewed from a lifespan perspective, and of the psychological and social meanings of the word "family." This international, multidisciplinary journal features conceptual and empirical work, commentaries, and book reviews from the fields of the social sciences, humanities, biological sciences, law, and social policy. In addition to examining ethical, biological, financial, social and psychological adoption issues, Adoption Quarterly addresses continuity in adoption issues that are important to both practitioners and researchers, such as: negotiation of birth and adoptive family contact.
期刊最新文献
Social Competence, School Engagement, and School Performance Among US Children Adopted Through Private Domestic, International, and Foster Care Adoption A Lonely Position. Misrecognition and Belonging Among International Adoptees in Norway Beyond Telling: A Phenomenology of Adoptive Mothers’ Adoption Communication Openness with Early Adolescents Being Adopted and LGBTQ: An Autoethnographic Study of Intersectionality Long-Term Follow-Up of the Program for the Education and Enrichment of Relational Skills (PEERS) with Adolescent Adoptees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1