The European Peace Facility in action: rethinking EU-Africa partnership on peace and security?

A. Dinca
{"title":"The European Peace Facility in action: rethinking EU-Africa partnership on peace and security?","authors":"A. Dinca","doi":"10.58441/psf.v4i1.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The European Union (EU) and the African Union (AU) have had and continue to maintain a long-standing partnership on peace and security, which dates back to the establishment of the African Peace and Security Architecture (APSA) at the beginning of the 2000s. However, in 2021, the EU embarked on a different pathway of financing its activities in the field of peace and security by establishing the European Peace Facility (EPF). This new financial instrument allows the EU to directly finance (bypassing the AU) national and sub-regional military initiatives on the African continent, to finance lethal equipment for African armies and expand its scope globally. While the vast majority of current debates and research focus solely on the „train and equip“ provision of the EPF and its implications in the Ukrainian war, the EU engagement in Africa through the instrument mentioned above is scarcely assessed. Therefore, drawing on the theory of interregional security cooperation, this paper considers how establishing the EPF impacts the EU‘s engagement on the African continent in the security field. Empirically assessing the instances in which the EPF has been implemented on the African continent, this paper aims to answer the research question: how does the establishment and implementation of the EPF impact the EU-AU partnership on peace and security? This paper employs a qualitative research design, namely a case study approach of inquiry and process tracing methods. The results of this approach show two distinct tendencies. First, while implementing the EPF in Africa can solve certain operational and technical aspects of the EU engagement on the continent, the EU-AU partnership must be reinforced on the political and strategic levels. Moreover, considering the plethora of international and regional actors involved in managing the security dynamics on the African continent, it is essential to prioritise the political dimension of the EU-AU partnership.","PeriodicalId":34873,"journal":{"name":"Political Studies Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Studies Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58441/psf.v4i1.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The European Union (EU) and the African Union (AU) have had and continue to maintain a long-standing partnership on peace and security, which dates back to the establishment of the African Peace and Security Architecture (APSA) at the beginning of the 2000s. However, in 2021, the EU embarked on a different pathway of financing its activities in the field of peace and security by establishing the European Peace Facility (EPF). This new financial instrument allows the EU to directly finance (bypassing the AU) national and sub-regional military initiatives on the African continent, to finance lethal equipment for African armies and expand its scope globally. While the vast majority of current debates and research focus solely on the „train and equip“ provision of the EPF and its implications in the Ukrainian war, the EU engagement in Africa through the instrument mentioned above is scarcely assessed. Therefore, drawing on the theory of interregional security cooperation, this paper considers how establishing the EPF impacts the EU‘s engagement on the African continent in the security field. Empirically assessing the instances in which the EPF has been implemented on the African continent, this paper aims to answer the research question: how does the establishment and implementation of the EPF impact the EU-AU partnership on peace and security? This paper employs a qualitative research design, namely a case study approach of inquiry and process tracing methods. The results of this approach show two distinct tendencies. First, while implementing the EPF in Africa can solve certain operational and technical aspects of the EU engagement on the continent, the EU-AU partnership must be reinforced on the political and strategic levels. Moreover, considering the plethora of international and regional actors involved in managing the security dynamics on the African continent, it is essential to prioritise the political dimension of the EU-AU partnership.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行动中的欧洲和平机制:重新思考欧盟-非洲和平与安全伙伴关系?
欧洲联盟(欧盟)和非洲联盟(非盟)在和平与安全方面拥有并将继续保持长期的伙伴关系,这种伙伴关系可追溯到本世纪初建立的非洲和平与安全架构(APSA)。然而,在2021年,欧盟通过建立欧洲和平基金(EPF),走上了一条不同的途径,为其在和平与安全领域的活动提供资金。这种新的金融工具允许欧盟直接资助(绕过非盟)非洲大陆的国家和次区域军事行动,为非洲军队提供致命装备,并扩大其全球范围。虽然目前绝大多数的辩论和研究只关注紧急方案基金的“训练和装备”提供及其在乌克兰战争中的影响,但欧盟通过上述工具参与非洲事务的情况几乎没有得到评估。因此,本文借鉴区域间安全合作理论,研究建立EPF如何影响欧盟在安全领域对非洲大陆的参与。本文通过实证评估紧急方案基金在非洲大陆实施的实例,旨在回答研究问题:紧急方案基金的建立和实施如何影响欧盟-非盟在和平与安全方面的伙伴关系?本文采用定性研究设计,即案例研究法和过程追溯法。这种方法的结果显示出两种明显的趋势。首先,虽然在非洲实施紧急方案基金可以解决欧盟在非洲大陆参与的某些业务和技术方面的问题,但欧盟与非盟的伙伴关系必须在政治和战略层面得到加强。此外,考虑到参与管理非洲大陆安全动态的国际和区域行动者过多,必须优先考虑欧盟-非盟伙伴关系的政治层面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
A guidebook on fake news and online opinion altering agendas The European Peace Facility in action: rethinking EU-Africa partnership on peace and security? Populist Response to the Social Crisis in Denmark – How Iliberal-Authoritarian Populism Can Influence Newcomers? Analysis of Challenges to Ensuring Gender Equality in Science and Research: Recommended Policies for Republic of Moldova Mirroring the African Self and Mobility in Development Projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1