The Detour of Metaphor: Metaphor, Concept, and Strategy in Althusser and Derrida

IF 0.3 0 PHILOSOPHY Derrida Today Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.3366/drt.2022.0275
Vicente Montenegro Bralic
{"title":"The Detour of Metaphor: Metaphor, Concept, and Strategy in Althusser and Derrida","authors":"Vicente Montenegro Bralic","doi":"10.3366/drt.2022.0275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following some of the main arguments Derrida develops in ‘White Mythology’, in this article I propose an unexplored dialogue between Derrida and Althusser considering the use and the place that each of them gives to metaphor in their philosophical strategies. I give special attention to some rather isolated passages of ‘Elements of Self-Criticism’ and ‘Lenin and Philosophy’, where Althusser, against all evidence, seems to be quite aware of the importance of metaphor and mataphorization in every philosophical practice. As Balibar has argued, contrary to the metaphysical tradition, metaphor would not be the opposite but what anticipates the concept. In this sense, it is possible to observe how Althusser’s work has continuously put into practice – as the singular signature of his theoretical practice – something that I call the ‘detour of metaphor’ as a necessary ‘deviation’ for the production of new concepts. Without any evidence that Althusser may have known Derrida’s essay, I show how Althusser’s own theoretical work, one in which ‘metaphor’ as a philosophical theme appears to be rather anecdotic, is unexpectedly close to Derrida’s own positions concerning the margins of philosophy and its ‘outside’, the relation to the metaphysical tradition, and the importance of strategy in philosophy.","PeriodicalId":42836,"journal":{"name":"Derrida Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Derrida Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/drt.2022.0275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Following some of the main arguments Derrida develops in ‘White Mythology’, in this article I propose an unexplored dialogue between Derrida and Althusser considering the use and the place that each of them gives to metaphor in their philosophical strategies. I give special attention to some rather isolated passages of ‘Elements of Self-Criticism’ and ‘Lenin and Philosophy’, where Althusser, against all evidence, seems to be quite aware of the importance of metaphor and mataphorization in every philosophical practice. As Balibar has argued, contrary to the metaphysical tradition, metaphor would not be the opposite but what anticipates the concept. In this sense, it is possible to observe how Althusser’s work has continuously put into practice – as the singular signature of his theoretical practice – something that I call the ‘detour of metaphor’ as a necessary ‘deviation’ for the production of new concepts. Without any evidence that Althusser may have known Derrida’s essay, I show how Althusser’s own theoretical work, one in which ‘metaphor’ as a philosophical theme appears to be rather anecdotic, is unexpectedly close to Derrida’s own positions concerning the margins of philosophy and its ‘outside’, the relation to the metaphysical tradition, and the importance of strategy in philosophy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
隐喻的迂回:阿尔都塞与德里达的隐喻、概念与策略
根据德里达在《白色神话》中提出的一些主要论点,在这篇文章中,我提出了德里达和阿尔都塞之间未经探索的对话,考虑到他们各自在哲学策略中对隐喻的使用和地位。我特别注意《自我批评的要素》和《列宁与哲学》中一些相当孤立的段落,在这些段落中,阿尔都塞似乎完全意识到隐喻和隐喻化在每一种哲学实践中的重要性。正如巴里巴尔所说,与形而上学传统相反,隐喻不是相反的,而是对概念的预期。从这个意义上说,我们可以观察到阿尔都塞的作品是如何不断地付诸实践的——作为他理论实践的独特标志——我称之为“隐喻的迂回”,作为产生新概念的必要“偏离”。在没有任何证据表明阿尔都塞可能知道德里达的文章的情况下,我展示了阿尔都塞自己的理论工作,其中“隐喻”作为一个哲学主题似乎相当轶事,是如何出乎意料地接近德里达自己关于哲学边缘及其“外部”、与形而上学传统的关系,以及战略在哲学中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Derrida Today
Derrida Today PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
The (Anarchic) Gift of Gelassenheit: On an Undeveloped Motif in Derrida's Donner le temps II Propriety, Facticity, Normativity The Keep. Uncanny Propriation: Derrida’s Marrano Objection Between the Ocean and the Ground: Giving Surfaces Special Issue Introduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1