The Effects of Shared Decision-Making on Patient Participation in Discharge Meetings in a Behavioral Health Unit.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-04-10 DOI:10.1177/10783903221085597
Shana Williams, Julee Waldrop
{"title":"The Effects of Shared Decision-Making on Patient Participation in Discharge Meetings in a Behavioral Health Unit.","authors":"Shana Williams, Julee Waldrop","doi":"10.1177/10783903221085597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Research suggests that persons diagnosed with behavioral health illnesses can benefit from shared decision-making. On an inpatient behavioral health unit, low Press Ganey scores related to satisfaction with involvement in care triggered a root cause analysis that identified patients did not feel engaged by nursing during their time together; and discharge meetings with the health care team were not required.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The purpose of this quality improvement project was to improve patient perception of involvement in their care as evidenced by increased Press Ganey scores and increased number of patients involved in discharge meetings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nurses used an evidence-based model for nurse-patient communication: the Seeking information, Engaging in conversation, Exploring options, and Deciding on treatment (SEED) and use of a Control Preferences Scale (CPS) to increase communication about treatment and discharge decisions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 120 patients engaged in the intervention. Patient presence at discharge meetings increased from 39% to 82% (<i>p</i> < .001), and Press Ganey scores evidenced minimal change.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of the SEED model and CPS by nurses was effective in increasing patients' involvement in their treatment. Although findings were limited due to COVID-19, the study suggests that improving patient involvement from admission through discharge throughout hospitalization can improve patient experience scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":17229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association","volume":"1 1","pages":"180-186"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10783903221085597","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Research suggests that persons diagnosed with behavioral health illnesses can benefit from shared decision-making. On an inpatient behavioral health unit, low Press Ganey scores related to satisfaction with involvement in care triggered a root cause analysis that identified patients did not feel engaged by nursing during their time together; and discharge meetings with the health care team were not required.

Aims: The purpose of this quality improvement project was to improve patient perception of involvement in their care as evidenced by increased Press Ganey scores and increased number of patients involved in discharge meetings.

Methods: Nurses used an evidence-based model for nurse-patient communication: the Seeking information, Engaging in conversation, Exploring options, and Deciding on treatment (SEED) and use of a Control Preferences Scale (CPS) to increase communication about treatment and discharge decisions.

Results: A total of 120 patients engaged in the intervention. Patient presence at discharge meetings increased from 39% to 82% (p < .001), and Press Ganey scores evidenced minimal change.

Conclusions: Use of the SEED model and CPS by nurses was effective in increasing patients' involvement in their treatment. Although findings were limited due to COVID-19, the study suggests that improving patient involvement from admission through discharge throughout hospitalization can improve patient experience scores.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共同决策对行为健康单位出院会议患者参与的影响。
背景研究表明,被诊断患有行为健康疾病的人可以从共同决策中受益。在一个住院行为健康单元中,与参与护理的满意度相关的低Press-Ganey评分引发了一项根本原因分析,确定患者在一起期间没有参与护理;不需要与卫生保健小组举行出院会议。AIMS该质量改进项目的目的是提高患者对参与其护理的感知,Press-Ganey评分的增加和参与出院会议的患者人数的增加证明了这一点。方法使用基于证据的护患沟通模型:寻求信息、参与对话、探索选项和决定治疗(SEED),并使用控制偏好量表(CPS)来增加关于治疗和出院决策的沟通。结果共有120名患者参与了干预。患者出席出院会议的比例从39%增加到82%(p<0.001),Press-Ganey评分变化最小。结论护士采用SEED模式和CPS能有效地提高患者对治疗的参与度。尽管研究结果因新冠肺炎而受到限制,但研究表明,改善患者从入院到出院的整个住院过程,可以提高患者的体验得分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association (JAPNA) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal publishing up-to-date information to promote psychiatric nursing, improve mental health care for culturally diverse individuals, families, groups, and communities, as well as shape health care policy for the delivery of mental health services. JAPNA publishes both clinical and research articles relevant to psychiatric nursing. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Chatbot-Based Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Program for University Students With Depressive Symptoms: Intervention Development and Pilot Evaluation. A Novel Training Modality for Providers in the Emergency Department Using a Computer-Based Scenario: A Pilot Study. Earthquake From the Perspectives of Amputee Children and Their Parents/Caregivers: A Phenomenological Study. The Influence of Writers on Psychiatric Mental Health Care Policy and Practice. Preparing for the Future While Honoring the Past.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1