Feedback with feeling? How emotional language in feedback affects individual performance

IF 3.6 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Accounting Organizations and Society Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.aos.2021.101329
Devon Erickson , D. Kip Holderness Jr. , Kari Joseph Olsen , Todd A. Thornock
{"title":"Feedback with feeling? How emotional language in feedback affects individual performance","authors":"Devon Erickson ,&nbsp;D. Kip Holderness Jr. ,&nbsp;Kari Joseph Olsen ,&nbsp;Todd A. Thornock","doi":"10.1016/j.aos.2021.101329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Our study examines the influence of manager emotion on the effectiveness of feedback in motivating performance. Feedback Intervention Theory (Kluger &amp; DeNisi,1996) suggests that feedback cues can shift feedback recipients’ attention away from the implications of the feedback for the task and toward the implications for the self. We propose that negative emotional language from a manager acts as a feedback cue directing employees’ attention more toward the self, and therefore, reduces employee effort in response to negative feedback. Consistent with our prediction, we find that negative emotional language decreases employee performance in response to negative feedback. In contrast, positive emotional language has no effect on employee performance in response to positive feedback. In two additional experiments, we provide triangulating evidence – via moderation-of-process and direct measurement – supporting our proposed mechanism, i.e., that the effect of negative emotional language on performance occurs by shifting individuals’ attention away from the task and toward the self. In doing so, we also show that managers can attenuate the effect of negative emotional language on subsequent performance by emphasizing that feedback relates to the task and not the self. Our study identifies a novel feedback intervention cue and provides corroborating evidence of Feedback Intervention Theory. Overall, our findings suggest that managers should consider how expressions of emotion accompanying feedback affect employee attention and subsequent performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48379,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Organizations and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting Organizations and Society","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361368221001070","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Our study examines the influence of manager emotion on the effectiveness of feedback in motivating performance. Feedback Intervention Theory (Kluger & DeNisi,1996) suggests that feedback cues can shift feedback recipients’ attention away from the implications of the feedback for the task and toward the implications for the self. We propose that negative emotional language from a manager acts as a feedback cue directing employees’ attention more toward the self, and therefore, reduces employee effort in response to negative feedback. Consistent with our prediction, we find that negative emotional language decreases employee performance in response to negative feedback. In contrast, positive emotional language has no effect on employee performance in response to positive feedback. In two additional experiments, we provide triangulating evidence – via moderation-of-process and direct measurement – supporting our proposed mechanism, i.e., that the effect of negative emotional language on performance occurs by shifting individuals’ attention away from the task and toward the self. In doing so, we also show that managers can attenuate the effect of negative emotional language on subsequent performance by emphasizing that feedback relates to the task and not the self. Our study identifies a novel feedback intervention cue and provides corroborating evidence of Feedback Intervention Theory. Overall, our findings suggest that managers should consider how expressions of emotion accompanying feedback affect employee attention and subsequent performance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有感觉的反馈?反馈中的情绪语言如何影响个人表现
本研究考察了管理者情绪对激励绩效的反馈有效性的影响。反馈干预理论(Kluger &;DeNisi(1996)认为反馈线索可以将反馈接受者的注意力从反馈对任务的影响转移到对自我的影响上。我们认为,管理者的消极情绪语言作为一种反馈线索,将员工的注意力更多地引向自我,因此,减少了员工对消极反馈的反应。与我们的预测一致,我们发现消极的情绪语言会降低员工对消极反馈的反应。相反,积极情绪语言对积极反馈下的员工绩效没有影响。在另外两个实验中,我们通过过程调节和直接测量提供了三角测量证据来支持我们提出的机制,即消极情绪语言对表现的影响是通过将个人的注意力从任务转移到自我而发生的。在这样做的过程中,我们还表明,管理者可以通过强调反馈与任务有关而不是与自我有关来减弱负面情绪语言对后续表现的影响。本研究确定了一种新的反馈干预线索,并为反馈干预理论提供了确凿的证据。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,管理者应该考虑伴随反馈的情绪表达如何影响员工的注意力和随后的绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Accounting, Organizations & Society is a major international journal concerned with all aspects of the relationship between accounting and human behaviour, organizational structures and processes, and the changing social and political environment of the enterprise.
期刊最新文献
What you are versus what you do: The effect of noun-verb framing in earnings conference calls Seeking justice: Inequitable management compensation and employee whistleblowing The impact of descriptor identicalness on investors' judgements of managers’ opportunistic estimation choices Bringing morality back in: Accounting as moral interlocutor in reflective equilibrium processes Accounting and the shifting spheres: The economic, the public, the planet
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1