A qualitative study of improving the operations strategy of logistics using radio frequency identification

J. Flanagan, Candice McGovern
{"title":"A qualitative study of improving the operations strategy of logistics using radio frequency identification","authors":"J. Flanagan, Candice McGovern","doi":"10.1108/jgoss-04-2021-0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to investigate how radio frequency identification (RFID) is used and opinions about RFID in two world-leading logistics companies and four organisations in their supply network. Operations strategy was used to understand the sources of operations improvement and associated competitive advantage. However, the complexity of operations strategy hampers an evaluation of the benefits of RFID for logistics processes. We can evaluate RFID applied in logistics processes by thoroughly applying the theories of operations strategy.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nParticipants were recruited based on their roles and level of experience using non-probability purposive sampling. The findings were checked with participants to confirm interpretations and to ask confirming questions as necessary. Interviews were conducted as video chats. NVivo Pro was used for the fragmentation, classification, management and analysis of the primary and secondary data, allowing themes and relationships to emerge inductively. The literature was compared with the primary data.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings reinforce the argument that a firm can improve more than one performance objective at a time; show the relevance of technology and an operations performance objective; support the argument that top management strategies to implement technology should be aligned with the operations strategy and business aspirations.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis research area would benefit from more detailed investigation to strengthen the arguments for the relationships between RFID capabilities and elements of operations strategy for logistics processes. The findings indicate that top management support of strategically aligned RFID projects will have the best chance of success if they create and leverage valuable data whilst addressing identified competitive priorities.\n\n\nPractical implications\nSmart connected devices, such as RFID, give firms access to big data, which can be used to develop long-term processes, to achieve competitive advantage and access new forms of economic value. RFID cumulatively influences the operations performance objectives of cost, quality, flexibility, speed, dependability and technology. Business strategies based on technology should align with operations strategy.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThe sharing of operational performance results, both before and after the implementation of RFID, will help to build learning within operations, increase the support of senior management and improve the performance of logistics processes with the associated benefits for society at large.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nRFID is often evaluated in terms of theoretical technical or cost benefits. This research evaluates RFID by assessing and suggesting how it can contribute to operations strategy.\n","PeriodicalId":43346,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jgoss-04-2021-0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate how radio frequency identification (RFID) is used and opinions about RFID in two world-leading logistics companies and four organisations in their supply network. Operations strategy was used to understand the sources of operations improvement and associated competitive advantage. However, the complexity of operations strategy hampers an evaluation of the benefits of RFID for logistics processes. We can evaluate RFID applied in logistics processes by thoroughly applying the theories of operations strategy. Design/methodology/approach Participants were recruited based on their roles and level of experience using non-probability purposive sampling. The findings were checked with participants to confirm interpretations and to ask confirming questions as necessary. Interviews were conducted as video chats. NVivo Pro was used for the fragmentation, classification, management and analysis of the primary and secondary data, allowing themes and relationships to emerge inductively. The literature was compared with the primary data. Findings The findings reinforce the argument that a firm can improve more than one performance objective at a time; show the relevance of technology and an operations performance objective; support the argument that top management strategies to implement technology should be aligned with the operations strategy and business aspirations. Research limitations/implications This research area would benefit from more detailed investigation to strengthen the arguments for the relationships between RFID capabilities and elements of operations strategy for logistics processes. The findings indicate that top management support of strategically aligned RFID projects will have the best chance of success if they create and leverage valuable data whilst addressing identified competitive priorities. Practical implications Smart connected devices, such as RFID, give firms access to big data, which can be used to develop long-term processes, to achieve competitive advantage and access new forms of economic value. RFID cumulatively influences the operations performance objectives of cost, quality, flexibility, speed, dependability and technology. Business strategies based on technology should align with operations strategy. Social implications The sharing of operational performance results, both before and after the implementation of RFID, will help to build learning within operations, increase the support of senior management and improve the performance of logistics processes with the associated benefits for society at large. Originality/value RFID is often evaluated in terms of theoretical technical or cost benefits. This research evaluates RFID by assessing and suggesting how it can contribute to operations strategy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用射频识别技术改进物流作业策略的定性研究
目的本研究旨在调查射频识别(RFID)在两家世界领先的物流公司和四家供应网络组织中的使用情况以及对RFID的看法。运营战略用于了解运营改进的来源和相关的竞争优势。然而,运营策略的复杂性阻碍了对RFID对物流流程的好处进行评估。我们可以通过深入应用运营策略理论来评估RFID在物流过程中的应用。设计/方法/方法根据参与者的角色和经验水平,采用非概率目的抽样方法招募参与者。与参与者一起检查研究结果,以确认解释,并在必要时提出确认问题。访谈以视频聊天的方式进行。NVivo Pro用于初级和次级数据的碎片化、分类、管理和分析,使主题和关系能够归纳出现。将文献与原始数据进行了比较。调查结果强化了这样一种论点,即一家公司一次可以提高多个绩效目标;显示技术与运营绩效目标的相关性;支持最高管理层实施技术的战略应与运营战略和业务愿望相一致的论点。研究局限性/含义本研究领域将受益于更详细的调查,以加强RFID能力与物流流程运营战略要素之间关系的论证。研究结果表明,如果高层管理人员在解决已确定的竞争重点的同时,创造并利用有价值的数据,那么他们对战略一致的RFID项目的支持将有最大的成功机会。实际意义RFID等智能连接设备使企业能够访问大数据,这些数据可用于开发长期流程,以获得竞争优势并获得新形式的经济价值。RFID对成本、质量、灵活性、速度、可靠性和技术等运营绩效目标产生了累积影响。基于技术的商业战略应与运营战略保持一致。社会影响RFID实施前后的运营绩效结果共享将有助于在运营中建立学习,增加高级管理层的支持,并提高物流流程的绩效,为整个社会带来相关利益。独创性/价值RFID通常根据理论技术或成本效益进行评估。这项研究通过评估和建议RFID如何为运营战略做出贡献来评估RFID。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing aims to foster and lead the international debate on global operations and strategic sourcing. It provides a central, authoritative and independent forum for the critical evaluation and dissemination of research and development, applications, processes and current practices relating to sourcing strategically for products, services, competences and resources on a global scale and to designing, implementing and managing the resulting global operations. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing places a strong emphasis on applied research with relevant implications for both knowledge and practice. Also, the journal aims to facilitate the exchange of ideas and opinions on research projects and issues. As such, on top of a standard section publishing scientific articles, there will be two additional sections: "The Industry ViewPoint": in this section, industrial practitioners from around the world will be invited (max 2 contributions per issue) to present their point of view on a relevant subject area. This is intended to give the journal not just an academic focus, but a practical focus as well. In this way, we intend to reflect a trend that has characterised the past few decades, where interests and initiatives in research, academia and industry have been more and more converging to the point of collaborative relationships being a common practice. "Research Updates - Executive Summaries". In this section, researchers around the world will be given the opportunity to present their research projects in the area of global sourcing and outsourcing by means of an executive summary of their project. This will increase awareness of the on-going research projects in the area and it will attract interest from industry.
期刊最新文献
Observation of post-yield supply chain impediments for spoilage mitigation and revenue generation opportunities at countryside Digital procurement towards new performance frontiers: a systematic literature review and future research fronts A conceptual framework for a new service model: digital servitization with an Industrial 4.0 perspective A multinomial modeling approach to assess supplier delivery performance for buyer-supplier alignment Artificial intelligence-based supply chain resilience for improving firm performance in emerging markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1